Jump to content


Did WG forgot about T69?


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

BrokeX_X #1 Posted 14 August 2017 - 10:30 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 7193 battles
  • 4
  • [S-D-Z] S-D-Z
  • Member since:
    09-23-2016

Is it just me or T69 is just bad compared to the other mediums?

 

I really feel that WG totally forgot about it.

 

Atleast they can adjust dispersion values when moving cupola,hull etc.


Edited by BrokeX_X, 14 August 2017 - 10:32 PM.


Junglist_ #2 Posted 14 August 2017 - 10:40 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 37139 battles
  • 1,348
  • Member since:
    06-17-2013

There is quite a big rebalancing thing going on on both CT and ST including several tier 9 and 10 medium tanks and I think we're in for some more so I wouldn't be surprised if the T69 would receive some love as well. 

Although looking at the changes its probably gonna get impenetrable turret and 0.45 accuracy...


Edited by Junglist_, 14 August 2017 - 10:41 PM.


Warzey #3 Posted 14 August 2017 - 10:41 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 57073 battles
  • 949
  • Member since:
    04-29-2011

I wouldn't really say that, most of the T8 mediums are generally bad compared to other available stuff. Especially with recent MM, the T8 mediums generally range from bad to playable in terms of performance.



shane73tank #4 Posted 14 August 2017 - 10:59 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 28207 battles
  • 2,020
  • [USAGI] USAGI
  • Member since:
    03-01-2014
The upcoming hd model will be welcome, it is far inferior to the lorr40t though would b nice if it had similar pen or at least mobility to get at those nice juicy sides 

Balc0ra #5 Posted 14 August 2017 - 11:32 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 66296 battles
  • 16,313
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
It's a tier 8 medium. With the exception of the Obj 416. They are generally bad tier for tier vs the rest. That said, vs other tier 8 mediums. It could still use some gun handling love indeed.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users