Jump to content


Is this the prove that RNG have presetted action during the game ?


  • Please log in to reply
43 replies to this topic

zukimik #1 Posted 19 August 2017 - 07:01 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 55257 battles
  • 66
  • Member since:
    08-05-2011

As you can see in the picture i got shot in the front wheel and i got Tracked and Amo Racked in the same time, no problem you will say but take a look at the hit, it was in the front wheel, now unless the Centurion 7/1 have the amo rack stored in the front wheels there in no way i can get amo racked from that shot. I'm asking and i'm sure o it we are preprogrammed from the beginning with what modules we are about to lose in particular games. I noticed this for a while, i shot peoples that are hull down in the turret and i track him and many other aspect of the game that i'm sure are presetted before even the game starts.

 

This is the picture, if you want i also have the complete replay of that game.

 

https://ibb.co/jusj2Q


Edited by zukimik, 19 August 2017 - 07:10 AM.


jabster #2 Posted 19 August 2017 - 07:05 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 12516 battles
  • 22,056
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    12-30-2010

View Postzukimik, on 19 August 2017 - 06:01 AM, said:

As you can see in the picture i got shot in the front wheel and i got Tracked and Amo Racked in the same time, no problem you will say but take a look at the hit, it was in the front wheel, now unless the Centurion 7/1 have the amo rack stored in the front wheels there in no way i can get amo racked from that shot. I'm asking and i sure o it we are preprogrammed from the beginning with what modules we are about to lose in particular games. I noticed this for a while, i shot peoples that are hull down in the turret and i track him and many other aspect of the game that i'm sure are presetted before even the tame starts.

 

This is the picture, if you want i also have the complete replay of that game.

 

https://ibb.co/mR9iU5

 

Yes it does, I mean why wouldn't it?

zukimik #3 Posted 19 August 2017 - 07:12 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 55257 battles
  • 66
  • Member since:
    08-05-2011
This is unfair... anyway this is a bad way to manage the players equality 

DiMtopia #4 Posted 19 August 2017 - 07:13 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 14438 battles
  • 765
  • [1ADRM] 1ADRM
  • Member since:
    09-17-2013

View Postzukimik, on 19 August 2017 - 08:01 AM, said:

As you can see in the picture i got shot in the front wheel and i got Tracked and Amo Racked in the same time, no problem you will say but take a look at the hit, it was in the front wheel, now unless the Centurion 7/1 have the amo rack stored in the front wheels there in no way i can get amo racked from that shot. I'm asking and i'm sure o it we are preprogrammed from the beginning with what modules we are about to lose in particular games. I noticed this for a while, i shot peoples that are hull down in the turret and i track him and many other aspect of the game that i'm sure are presetted before even the game starts.

 

This is the picture, if you want i also have the complete replay of that game.

 

https://ibb.co/jusj2Q

 

49k battles and you actually believe that.:facepalm:

holy cow

then again people thing earth is flat and only 6000 years old.:amazed:

 



jabster #5 Posted 19 August 2017 - 07:16 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 12516 battles
  • 22,056
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    12-30-2010

View Postzukimik, on 19 August 2017 - 06:12 AM, said:

This is unfair... anyway this is a bad way to manage the players equality 

 

Well quite. I'd have probably at least a 65% win-rate if the game didn't pick on me. Oh and don't let any of the forum trolls tell you that you're wrong about this. You've got a screenshot and everything, what more evidence is needed?


Edited by jabster, 19 August 2017 - 07:18 AM.


TrewSx #6 Posted 19 August 2017 - 07:18 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 59759 battles
  • 667
  • Member since:
    03-02-2011

Edited by TrewSx, 19 August 2017 - 07:18 AM.


zukimik #7 Posted 19 August 2017 - 07:27 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 55257 battles
  • 66
  • Member since:
    08-05-2011

View PostDiMtopia, on 19 August 2017 - 06:13 AM, said:

 

49k battles and you actually believe that.:facepalm:

holy cow

then again people thing earth is flat and only 6000 years old.:amazed:

 

 

I want not to believe it, but the screen shot tell everything

DiMtopia #8 Posted 19 August 2017 - 07:29 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 14438 battles
  • 765
  • [1ADRM] 1ADRM
  • Member since:
    09-17-2013

View Postzukimik, on 19 August 2017 - 08:27 AM, said:

 

I want not to believe it, but the screen shot tell everything

 

oh, my bad. then it surely must be true.

zukimik #9 Posted 19 August 2017 - 07:34 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 55257 battles
  • 66
  • Member since:
    08-05-2011

View PostDiMtopia, on 19 August 2017 - 06:29 AM, said:

 

oh, my bad. then it surely must be true.

 

OK, i'm stupid, please explain the shot ....

 



Kartoshkaya #10 Posted 19 August 2017 - 07:59 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 21615 battles
  • 335
  • Member since:
    01-01-2015

Do you understand that tracers and hit markers are local and the actual shoot is server side, thus implying you CANNOT say where you really get shoot ?

 

Also no, you don't track people shooting their turret unless you have 999ping.



zukimik #11 Posted 19 August 2017 - 08:01 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 55257 battles
  • 66
  • Member since:
    08-05-2011
So we lose games because of the server lag ?

JuicyProduction #12 Posted 19 August 2017 - 08:08 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 27521 battles
  • 274
  • [OMNI] OMNI
  • Member since:
    11-10-2013

It is a little bit worrying when all these oranges are always high rolling me several shots in a row as well as my modules being taken out more often by little boop bots as well as having oranges seamlessly testing their luck on my thickest armour only to pen it with there baddy rng positive 25% extra pen. I love these little conspiracy theories. I'm not even joking I genuinely believe something goes on this game. 

 

Anyway, if 'pre calculated loss of modules' was true people wouldn't be complaining about aim bots always aiming for ammo racks because it would be rng deciding anyway. Man I need to find the calculations on how chances of damaging a module you hit works. anyway as someone said the only logical explanation is the server vs client side information being displayed via pen marks. This is defo true because there's been times I tried to snap a slim shot into a tank running for cover and even though my shell looks like it goes behind the tank it registers as a hit. And that's with decent ping. 



Kartoshkaya #13 Posted 19 August 2017 - 08:10 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 21615 battles
  • 335
  • Member since:
    01-01-2015

View Postzukimik, on 19 August 2017 - 08:01 AM, said:

So we lose games because of the server lag ?

 

Loosing or winning only depends on shooting ?



RamRaid90 #14 Posted 19 August 2017 - 08:11 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 19959 battles
  • 6,044
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

Centurions ammo rack is conveniently located directly behind the lower plate. You can and will take ammo rack damage from almost every hit to the front half of your hull.

 

 



Kupsztas #15 Posted 19 August 2017 - 08:13 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 20467 battles
  • 1,551
  • [PUNKS] PUNKS
  • Member since:
    02-02-2014

Replay please

 

We know exactly NOTHING about the angle at which the enemy shell came... if you were angled 45 degrees towards the enemy it is very probable for a 120mm gun to reach the ammorack through the front wheel.



zukimik #16 Posted 19 August 2017 - 08:24 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 55257 battles
  • 66
  • Member since:
    08-05-2011

View PostKartoshkaya, on 19 August 2017 - 07:10 AM, said:

 

Loosing or winning only depends on shooting ?

 

Not necessarily, but it's a decisive factor in many games. And there are a lot of shots that virtually goes straight trough the tank and the server never record your shot, basically the server give's you a gost shot, i live in Romania and i have the best internet connection you can get in Europe as a private person. I have a band of 1000 Mb/s, my ping rarely goes up to 50 ms, usually is somewhere between 30 and 40 ms. So i can't be blamed for the server lag if my shells miss due to the server lag. I also have a super computer that can handle this game very easily.

 

Case: Corsair CC-9011059-WW Graphite Series 780T, Full-Tower ATX Performance LED Gaming
Power supply: Corsair RMi Series RM750i, 80 PLUS® Gold, 750 W, PFC Activ
Motherboard: Gigabyte, AORUS-Z270X-Gaming 7, Socket 1151, DDR4, ATX
CPU: Intel Core™ i7-7700K, 4.20Ghz, Kaby Lake, 8MB, Socket 1151
GPU: ASUS GeForce® GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition, 11GB GDDR5X, 352-bit
Ram Memory: Corsair 32GB (4x8GB), DDR4, CL16, 3200 MHz, Vengeance LPX
Monitor Gaming LED IPS ASUS ROG Swift 27", WQHD, HDMI, DisplayPort, Black, PG279Q
Solid State Drive (SSD) Samsung 960 EVO, 500GB, M.2, P

 

Imagine that i don't pay attention to  situations like this (this one caught my attention because it was to obviously that something is wrong) but probably there are hundreds of shells like this every game you play. No matter your internet connection or your PC specs, you will get these server lags and in some situations you can lose the game just because of that


Edited by zukimik, 19 August 2017 - 08:29 AM.


zukimik #17 Posted 19 August 2017 - 08:34 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 55257 battles
  • 66
  • Member since:
    08-05-2011

View PostKupsztas, on 19 August 2017 - 07:13 AM, said:

Replay please

 

We know exactly NOTHING about the angle at which the enemy shell came... if you were angled 45 degrees towards the enemy it is very probable for a 120mm gun to reach the ammorack through the front wheel.

 

This could be an real explication, here i uploaded the scene where clearly you can see the M103 possition:

 

https://www.youtube....h?v=HDUk6sxLmTw



Shivvering #18 Posted 19 August 2017 - 08:34 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 28686 battles
  • 246
  • Member since:
    09-24-2011
Is it really time for the weekly 'RNG is rigged, I have all the evidence from a single occurence' post already?

Shivvering #19 Posted 19 August 2017 - 08:37 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 28686 battles
  • 246
  • Member since:
    09-24-2011

View Postzukimik, on 19 August 2017 - 08:34 AM, said:

 

This could be an real explication, here i uploaded the scene where clearly you can see the M103 possition:

 

https://www.youtube....h?v=HDUk6sxLmTw

 

He wasn't at 90 degrees. Looks like it may have hit at the marker in your screen shot, but from that angle it would have continued into the front third of your hull.



zukimik #20 Posted 19 August 2017 - 08:38 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 55257 battles
  • 66
  • Member since:
    08-05-2011

View PostRamRaid90, on 19 August 2017 - 07:11 AM, said:

Centurions ammo rack is conveniently located directly behind the lower plate. You can and will take ammo rack damage from almost every hit to the front half of your hull.

 

 

 

​The shot is clearly above my lower plate, and he was way lower than me he shot me from down below




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users