Jump to content


Stronghold Changes and Discounts


  • Please log in to reply
40 replies to this topic

Community #1 Posted 24 August 2017 - 05:04 PM

    Sergeant

  • Content Team
  • 0 battles
  • 26,339
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011
Earn Industrial Resource from Random Battles and get discounts on Stronghold Buildings in September!

The full text of the news item

stenlis #2 Posted 24 August 2017 - 05:33 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 48550 battles
  • 20
  • [CRBER] CRBER
  • Member since:
    04-21-2012

Well....THIS..... T-H-I-S...... LOOOOOOOKS very sweet AWESOME.

 

Two future suggestions :

 

1.Make in future so clans can buy GOLD with Industrial Resource(IR) in strongholds.

Special building which with higher tier lets convert Industrial Resource to gold more generously and clan leader can decide where converted gold goes to, if it goes to clans treasury or directly to players who earned IR. And option that allows making % distribution for example : 80% earned gold goes directly to players who farmed IR & 20% goes to clans treasury for future savings.

"Gold Market" building example : 

 

Tier 1:  1000 IR = 1 gold

Tier 2:  800 IR = 1 gold

Tier 3:  700 IR = 1 gold

Tier 4:  600 IR = 1 gold

Tier 5: 500 IR = 1 gold

Tier 6: 400 IR = 1 gold

Tier 7: 300 IR = 1 gold

Tier 8: 200 IR = 1 gold

Tier 9: 100 IR = 1 gold

Tier 10 50 IR = 1 gold

(WG can adjust ratio as it see fit, its just an example - to get an general idea)

 

2. Allow clan leader to customize all its clan members roles and there power in clan life.

Example 1 :

Lets say I wont to allow all my junior officers to use credit reserves on there own will but I cant, because only executive commander can do so. But EX-CO also can distribute gold as they see fit, which I only want to be done by specific one person. So customizing who can do what would be a real life saver for my clan(And probably for most of WOT clans)

 

Example 2 :

Same clan members starts flame war in clan chat and as clan leader I cant punish them properly (kicking from clan is to harsh). So lets say if I would be able to mute certain people on clan chat so they can read important info but they cant write them self - THAT  WOULD BE A BLISS.


Edited by stenlis, 24 August 2017 - 05:51 PM.


Ragewit #3 Posted 24 August 2017 - 05:57 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 46794 battles
  • 668
  • [WGRUP] WGRUP
  • Member since:
    12-04-2011
:rolleyes:

brumbarr #4 Posted 24 August 2017 - 06:01 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

WG plans to fix SH, a teambased clan competetive mode:

-implement skill based MM so its not competetive.

-ruin SH so noone plays it anymore

-make it a non team based mode

 

GJ WG, you  might aswell delete SH and call indistrual resources bonds.



Griva #5 Posted 24 August 2017 - 06:04 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Clan Commander
  • 32314 battles
  • 708
  • Member since:
    03-24-2011
It looks like step #4 of tutorial "How to destroy SH in 5 steps"

brumbarr #6 Posted 24 August 2017 - 06:21 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostGriva, on 24 August 2017 - 06:04 PM, said:

It looks like step #4 of tutorial "How to destroy SH in 5 steps"

 

Step 5: remove skirmishes.

Ba_nshee #7 Posted 24 August 2017 - 06:29 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 23921 battles
  • 233
  • [TRIGG] TRIGG
  • Member since:
    08-18-2016

Sounds awesome indeed! 

 

... so I guess, I'm looking for a clan, where we don't want to play SH/CW, we don't want any obligation, other than playing enough T10 battles for the bonuses. (On a decent a lvl.) (And maybe some decent "public behavior", if that's an option. :) ) And that's it.

 

It is awesome, if you ask me! :D


Edited by straubbazsi, 24 August 2017 - 07:36 PM.


SlyMeerkat #8 Posted 24 August 2017 - 06:41 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 16604 battles
  • 2,238
  • [FILO] FILO
  • Member since:
    01-29-2013
Nice

Corruption_Clan #9 Posted 24 August 2017 - 07:11 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 46078 battles
  • 724
  • Member since:
    11-19-2012


Unkel_Dolan #10 Posted 24 August 2017 - 07:45 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 27515 battles
  • 2,694
  • [NOPAN] NOPAN
  • Member since:
    12-14-2010
this is [edited]retarded, all you had to do to make people earn more boxes is to remove the [edited]retarded skill MM in tier 6 and 8 skirmishes, but no, instead of doing that let's just add a stupid feature that nobody ever asked for or cared about. is there anything WG can do correctly these days? 

Whaiz #11 Posted 24 August 2017 - 08:00 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 12148 battles
  • 25
  • Member since:
    06-02-2015

A little risky but very good idea

1) It is great that people will have a new reason to play tier X, clan gets more resources = if you are a clan member you will probably now have more active clan reserves so thumbs up, 

2) Strongholds battles can suffer greatly, even now sometimes you have to wait a while to look for a battle and with this strongholds battles may go extinct



brumbarr #12 Posted 24 August 2017 - 08:01 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostRenamedUser_500212111, on 24 August 2017 - 07:45 PM, said:

this is [edited]retarded, all you had to do to make people earn more boxes is to remove the [edited]retarded skill MM in tier 6 and 8 skirmishes, but no, instead of doing that let's just add a stupid feature that nobody ever asked for or cared about. is there anything WG can do correctly these days? 

 

Its a 1 step forward 2 steps back policy:

-Lets listen to players and fix CW

- but lets also not listen to them at all and ignore all the problems with SHs!



FireflyDivision #13 Posted 24 August 2017 - 08:11 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 24268 battles
  • 3,918
  • Member since:
    04-18-2011

View Postbrumbarr, on 24 August 2017 - 08:01 PM, said:

 

Its a 1 step forward 2 steps back policy:

-Lets listen to players and fix CW

- but lets also not listen to them at all and ignore all the problems with SHs!

 

Let's focus on cw for now. Maybe in the future we all can give feedback about sh too. 

brumbarr #14 Posted 24 August 2017 - 08:18 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostFireflyDivision, on 24 August 2017 - 08:11 PM, said:

 

Let's focus on cw for now. Maybe in the future we all can give feedback about sh too. 

 

But I cant grind credits in CW:P

FireflyDivision #15 Posted 24 August 2017 - 08:32 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 24268 battles
  • 3,918
  • Member since:
    04-18-2011

View Postbrumbarr, on 24 August 2017 - 08:18 PM, said:

 

But I cant grind credits in CW:P

 

Current situation is still 10x better than in the past for credits. In the past there weren't shs, there weren't bonusses... 

TijgernootTank #16 Posted 24 August 2017 - 08:38 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 47385 battles
  • 231
  • [TOURN] TOURN
  • Member since:
    03-31-2013

I think this is good news .

This will not destroy SH any further imo .

Now at least ranked battles may bring in some resources for the clan -- i think that makes this mode a bit more clanfriendly .

Same for upcoming Grand Battles .

It also counts for random tier 10 -- i see this as nice bonus for clan .



m1ch #17 Posted 24 August 2017 - 09:22 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 17511 battles
  • 317
  • [CELL] CELL
  • Member since:
    05-17-2011
That's insanely cool! Especially for me since I don't play stronkholdz or cws. Now, when you lads gonna fix your stupid awesome idea of   C O N S T A N T  +2 mm? 

Spurtung #18 Posted 24 August 2017 - 09:52 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 64670 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

Read up on Strongholds in our handy guide!

 

and...linked to the NA website.

 



armandio #19 Posted 24 August 2017 - 10:04 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 79865 battles
  • 2,047
  • Member since:
    04-19-2011

View PostFireflyDivision, on 24 August 2017 - 09:11 PM, said:

 

Let's focus on cw for now. Maybe in the future we all can give feedback about sh too. 

This is not CW thread, this is SH changes thread, go make your focus in CW thread, and not here.:trollface:

View PostFireflyDivision, on 24 August 2017 - 09:32 PM, said:

 

Current situation is still 10x better than in the past for credits. In the past there weren't shs, there weren't bonusses... 

 

Now You will :teethhappy:spam every thread with CW posts?!?

Calm down, You are to excited about upcoming CW.:D



FireflyDivision #20 Posted 24 August 2017 - 10:07 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 24268 battles
  • 3,918
  • Member since:
    04-18-2011

View Postarmandio, on 24 August 2017 - 10:04 PM, said:

This is not CW thread, this is SH changes thread, go make your focus in CW thread, and not here.:trollface:

 

Now You will :teethhappy:spam every thread with CW posts?!?

Calm down, You are to excited about upcoming CW.:D

 

Actually, the 2nd quote is about SH 




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users