Jump to content


Camo


  • Please log in to reply
34 replies to this topic

soul3ater #1 Posted 25 August 2017 - 12:11 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18764 battles
  • 635
  • Member since:
    07-27-2012

Swedish TD's got the best camo? I spotted one when I was literally less than 10 meters away from it...ok maybe 10m is bit exaggerated but still. it really scared the crp out of me. 

imo this tank needs a camo nerf, it's annoying to face it as it is.

 

for those who think im chatting utter duckpoop http://imgur.com/a/PM7Vk

is there a way to check TD camo ratings? nvm

 


Edited by soul3ater, 25 August 2017 - 02:35 AM.


laulaur #2 Posted 25 August 2017 - 12:14 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 46660 battles
  • 986
  • [BLAUR] BLAUR
  • Member since:
    08-11-2011

Yes, multiple ways.

The simplest one is ''Tank compare'' in your garage.



VarzA #3 Posted 25 August 2017 - 01:07 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 20521 battles
  • 1,379
  • [USAGI] USAGI
  • Member since:
    06-17-2011
Great camo and very low profile with great gun depression ... also mobility.

XxKuzkina_MatxX #4 Posted 25 August 2017 - 01:50 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 49690 battles
  • 1,766
  • [OXIDE] OXIDE
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016

Camo calculator...

http://www.wotinfo.n...camo-calculator

:girl:



soul3ater #5 Posted 25 August 2017 - 01:58 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18764 battles
  • 635
  • Member since:
    07-27-2012

View PostXxKuzkina_MatxX, on 25 August 2017 - 12:50 AM, said:

 

when it's moving camo= 24.90

when my foch 155 is stationary= 29.08

 

holy hell  ...that explains it. literally unplayable!. 

XxKuzkina_MatxX #6 Posted 25 August 2017 - 02:00 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 49690 battles
  • 1,766
  • [OXIDE] OXIDE
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016

I expected a come back like this :teethhappy:

 

Strv is cute please don't touch, your Foch is ugly. :bush:


Edited by XxKuzkina_MatxX, 25 August 2017 - 02:02 AM.


HugSeal #7 Posted 25 August 2017 - 02:05 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 22717 battles
  • 2,054
  • [SWEC] SWEC
  • Member since:
    05-10-2012

View Postsoul3ater, on 25 August 2017 - 12:11 AM, said:

Swedish TD's got the best camo? I spotted one when I was literally less than 10 meters away from it.

 

 

 

I call utter duckpoop on this since it is impossible to not spot it sooner.


Edited by HugSeal, 25 August 2017 - 02:05 AM.


Search_Warrant #8 Posted 25 August 2017 - 02:14 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 27192 battles
  • 6,158
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011

View PostHugSeal, on 25 August 2017 - 01:05 AM, said:

 

I call utter duckpoop on this since it is impossible to not spot it sooner.

 

IKR 50 meters is autospot.

soul3ater #9 Posted 25 August 2017 - 02:17 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18764 battles
  • 635
  • Member since:
    07-27-2012

View PostHugSeal, on 25 August 2017 - 01:05 AM, said:

 

I call utter duckpoop on this since it is impossible to not spot it sooner.

 

 

http://imgur.com/a/PM7Vk



malachi6 #10 Posted 25 August 2017 - 02:22 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 49918 battles
  • 3,465
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011
Of course you mean literally, literally figuratively.  Which means you do not literally mean literally.  But rather you mean literally,figuratively literally.

Edited by malachi6, 25 August 2017 - 02:22 AM.


HugSeal #11 Posted 25 August 2017 - 02:27 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 22717 battles
  • 2,054
  • [SWEC] SWEC
  • Member since:
    05-10-2012

View Postsoul3ater, on 25 August 2017 - 02:17 AM, said:

 

You are aware that the Foch is longer than 2 meters, right?

 

Again, completely impossible to not spot him until you're "literally less than 10 meters away". And we are talking about a tank in a bush, probably with a camonet.



soul3ater #12 Posted 25 August 2017 - 02:29 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18764 battles
  • 635
  • Member since:
    07-27-2012

View PostHugSeal, on 25 August 2017 - 01:27 AM, said:

 

You are aware that the Foch is longer than 2 meters, right?

 

Again, completely impossible to not spot him until you're "literally less than 10 meters away". And we are talking about a tank in a bush, probably with a camonet.

 

bruh...that was just an exaggeration.  you know I didn't mean " literally 10m" stop being all defensive.

 

my point still stands. the camo rating on that thing is ridiculous and must be fixed. 


Edited by soul3ater, 25 August 2017 - 02:30 AM.


HugSeal #13 Posted 25 August 2017 - 02:35 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 22717 battles
  • 2,054
  • [SWEC] SWEC
  • Member since:
    05-10-2012

View Postsoul3ater, on 25 August 2017 - 02:29 AM, said:

 

bruh...that was just an exaggeration.  you know I didn't mean " literally 10m" stop being all defensive.

 

Because silly exaggerations are such a great way to make a point.

 

And if I know you didn't mean literally, you know you didn't mean literally. Then why on earth would you say the tank was literally less than ten meters away? You immediately going offensive trying to talk down to people when someone disagrees with you says way more about you than anything else. (what does "stop being all defensive" even mean?)

 

And again, you are approaching a tank in a bush with a camonet active. The problem with your argument is that it isn't an argument against the UDES but rather an argument agains a LOT of tanks sitting in bushes with camonets. You are jsut trying to direct a very broad statement against something you in particular have a problem with. But how about bringing up points that is actually special for the UDES rather than basing your argument on something that applies to a LOT of tanks?

 

"The borsig is such a dumb tank, it's a TD with a fully traversible turret. He swung it around and shot me after I tracked him." That isn't an argument against the borsig but against turreted TDs in general, see the problem with your argument there?

 

By the way, your second most played tank is the 183... Funny how you don't seem to mind silly one-trick-ponies when you happen to play them "bruh".


Edited by HugSeal, 25 August 2017 - 02:37 AM.


soul3ater #14 Posted 25 August 2017 - 02:43 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18764 battles
  • 635
  • Member since:
    07-27-2012

View PostHugSeal, on 25 August 2017 - 01:35 AM, said:

 

Because silly exaggerations are such a great way to make a point.

 

And if I know you didn't mean literally, you know you didn't mean literally. Then why on earth would you say the tank was literally less than ten meters away? You immediately going offensive trying to talk down to people when someone disagrees with you says way more about you than anything else. (what does "stop being all defensive" even mean?)

 

And again, you are approaching a tank in a bush with a camonet active. The problem with your argument is that it isn't an argument against the UDES but rather an argument agains a LOT of tanks sitting in bushes with camonets. You are jsut trying to direct a very broad statement against something you in particular have a problem with. But how about bringing up points that is actually special for the UDES rather than basing your argument on something that applies to a LOT of tanks?

 

"The borsig is such a dumb tank, it's a TD with a fully traversible turret. He swung it around and shot me after I tracked him." That isn't an argument against the borsig but against turreted TDs in general, see the problem with your argument there?

 

By the way, your second most played tank is the 183... Funny how you don't seem to mind silly one-trick-ponies when you happen to play them "bruh".

 

what does my 183 got to do with anything? I just mentioned the camo of the tank and how ridiculous it is and you go berserk even checking my tanks and profile lol

 

you're all over the place. stop derailing the thread pls.



XxKuzkina_MatxX #15 Posted 25 August 2017 - 02:48 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 49690 battles
  • 1,766
  • [OXIDE] OXIDE
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016

View Postsoul3ater, on 25 August 2017 - 03:17 AM, said:

 

OMGGGGGGGGGGGG :)

 

btw you are being trolled so ignore!



soul3ater #16 Posted 25 August 2017 - 02:53 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18764 battles
  • 635
  • Member since:
    07-27-2012

View PostXxKuzkina_MatxX, on 25 August 2017 - 01:48 AM, said:

 

OMGGGGGGGGGGGG :)

 

btw you are being trolled so ignore!

 

the passive aggressiveness is real lol

 

hopefully they do something about this tank.


Edited by soul3ater, 25 August 2017 - 02:53 AM.


HugSeal #17 Posted 25 August 2017 - 02:53 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 22717 battles
  • 2,054
  • [SWEC] SWEC
  • Member since:
    05-10-2012

View Postsoul3ater, on 25 August 2017 - 02:43 AM, said:

 

what does my 183 got to do with anything? I just mentioned the camo of the tank and how ridiculous it is and you go berserk even checking my tanks and profile lol

 

you're all over the place. stop derailing the thread pls.

 

I go berzerk? I've already told you silly accuations and ad hominem says more about you than anything else. Yet you go on. Also, "even checking my stats and profile". I guess you consider 20 seconds of research is a chore, not everyone does. And if you'd spent a minute on research beforehand you wouldn't even need to make this thread.

 

I have given you good reasons as to why your argument doesn't hold up. But rather than actually bringing in some decent arguments or countering mine you call me countering your argument "derailing the thread" and me "going berzerk".

 

How about you actually put some thought behind your replies instead of just creating threads to get a pat on the back and ignore anyone who DARES tell you you're wrong?

 

The only thing you've brought to the thread is "I didn't spot this tank one time, it must be nerfed!" Not much to derail honestly.

 

And why I bring up the 183? I made it clear as I brought it up, had you bothered to read and understand my post. It's a one trick pony, just like the UDES. Only, when you happen to play the one trick pony it is not a problem. But if someone happens to play a one trick pony against you then it's another story completely. You're a hypocrite, simple as that.


Edited by HugSeal, 25 August 2017 - 03:01 AM.


XxKuzkina_MatxX #18 Posted 25 August 2017 - 03:13 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 49690 battles
  • 1,766
  • [OXIDE] OXIDE
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016

View Postsoul3ater, on 25 August 2017 - 03:53 AM, said:

 

the passive aggressiveness is real lol

 

hopefully they do something about this tank.

 

But when you think about it...

 

  • 390 alpha in a tier 10 TD is a joke (a bad one).
  • the siege mode is really crippling, every other tank in the game stops-aims-shoots while the strv stop-siege mode-aim-shoot-exit siege mode (kill me please!).
  • every t**t with heat pens you no matter the caliber (spam is real excdeeee).

 

About camo...i remember once in steppes encounter there are these lousy bushes overlooking the cap right at the red line. My team had a severe case of diarrhea and died on the other flank and i tried so hard and got so far. So i hid in these bushes watching a tiger2, a Ferdinand and Jagtiger capping 72 meters away while an E4 with a MASSIVE hard on for me circling the cap trying to find me. At 99% i shot the E4 just out of spite. :)


Edited by XxKuzkina_MatxX, 25 August 2017 - 03:14 AM.


soul3ater #19 Posted 25 August 2017 - 03:22 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18764 battles
  • 635
  • Member since:
    07-27-2012

View PostXxKuzkina_MatxX, on 25 August 2017 - 02:13 AM, said:

 

But when you think about it...

 

  • 390 alpha in a tier 10 TD is a joke (a bad one).
  • the siege mode is really crippling, every other tank in the game stops-aims-shoots while the strv stop-siege mode-aim-shoot-exit siege mode (kill me please!).
  • every t**t with heat pens you no matter the caliber (spam is real excdeeee).

 

About camo...i remember once in steppes encounter there are these lousy bushes overlooking the cap right at the red line. My team had a severe case of diarrhea and died on the other flank and i tried so hard and got so far. So i hid in these bushes watching a tiger2, a Ferdinand and Jagtiger capping 72 meters away while an E4 with a MASSIVE hard on for me circling the cap trying to find me. At 99% i shot the E4 just out of spite. :)

 

fair enough lol.

 

tbh I am aware of how good this tank is atm compared to the others but that's way things are and you gotta just accept it, that's the way WG conduct it's business and I am not even mad at them. down the line this tank will be nerfed into oblivion which will be replaced by another very good tank and so on. mark my words. 

 

I was just surprised of how the good the camo was to the point it really caught me off guard and scared me lol. thread was supposed to be light-hearted.



XxKuzkina_MatxX #20 Posted 25 August 2017 - 03:34 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 49690 battles
  • 1,766
  • [OXIDE] OXIDE
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016

View Postsoul3ater, on 25 August 2017 - 04:22 AM, said:

 

fair enough lol.

 

tbh I am aware of how good this tank is atm compared to the others but that's way things are and you gotta just accept it, that's the way WG conduct it's business and I am not even mad at them. down the line this tank will be nerfed into oblivion which will be replaced by another very good tank and so on. mark my words. 

 

I was just surprised of how the good the camo was to the point it really caught me off guard and scared me lol. thread was supposed to be light-hearted.

 

Foch B...shoooooooo balanced :trollface:




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users