Jump to content


Can we get a buff to 113 gun already ?


  • Please log in to reply
41 replies to this topic

Unforgiving_Destiny #1 Posted 25 August 2017 - 06:58 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 48344 battles
  • 489
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    04-29-2011

You think IS-4 gun is bad ? 113 gun is twice as bad , bloom is as big as my 24 inch monitor and even when fully aimed shell goes everywhere and your chance of hitting anything longer than 50~100 meters is pretty much 0 and even when engaging close combat you want to hit the E100 lower plate ? shell goes to the track , it is just bad and i was shocked to see actually it has worse dispersion than IS-4 which already is so crapand you can't hit anything with it . Even IS-7 gun is better than this pile of crap.


Edited by Princess_Ema, 25 August 2017 - 07:01 AM.


Gotma #2 Posted 25 August 2017 - 07:06 AM

    Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 51678 battles
  • 270
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    01-14-2011
I so hope this is a troll.

Are we playing the same game?

Unforgiving_Destiny #3 Posted 25 August 2017 - 07:14 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 48344 battles
  • 489
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    04-29-2011

View PostGotma, on 25 August 2017 - 06:06 AM, said:

I so hope this is a troll.

Are we playing the same game?

No we are not playing the same game since this game is nothing like  what it was in 2012 2013 and if you think 113 gun is any good then i need to ask you a question , are you drunk or high ? which one ?


Edited by Princess_Ema, 25 August 2017 - 07:16 AM.


shane73tank #4 Posted 25 August 2017 - 07:28 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 28146 battles
  • 2,020
  • [USAGI] USAGI
  • Member since:
    03-01-2014
Cmon shishx, say it ain't so , you animal

Gotma #5 Posted 25 August 2017 - 07:38 AM

    Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 51678 battles
  • 270
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    01-14-2011

View PostPrincess_Ema, on 25 August 2017 - 07:14 AM, said:

No we are not playing the same game since this game is nothing like  what it was in 2012 2013 and if you think 113 gun is any good then i need to ask you a question , are you drunk or high ? which one ?

 

The 113 has adequate gun handling for a mobile heavy like that. The IS4 on the other hand is diabolically slow and has way worse gun handling.

So how come you even compare those two?



brumbarr #6 Posted 25 August 2017 - 08:01 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostGotma, on 25 August 2017 - 07:38 AM, said:

 

The 113 has adequate gun handling for a mobile heavy like that. The IS4 on the other hand is diabolically slow and has way worse gun handling.

So how come you even compare those two?

Tbh, the 113 now has worse gun handling than the wz111 and the is7. And both of those do 490 dmg.



Gotma #7 Posted 25 August 2017 - 08:04 AM

    Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 51678 battles
  • 270
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    01-14-2011

View Postbrumbarr, on 25 August 2017 - 08:01 AM, said:

Tbh, the 113 now has worse gun handling than the wz111 and the is7. And both of those do 490 dmg.

 

That was not the question. The OP seems to believe that the 113 is underpowered because of said gun handling, which is so far from the truth I can't even find words.



shishx_the_animal #8 Posted 25 August 2017 - 08:17 AM

    Colonel

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 30995 battles
  • 3,861
  • [MEME] MEME
  • Member since:
    04-06-2013

View Postshane73tank, on 25 August 2017 - 06:28 AM, said:

Cmon shishx, say it ain't so , you animal

 

It ain't so. The gun isn't perfect but it's on a very good platform and makes it easy to brawl at close combat. But the WZ is much better, just compare damage on dpgwhores.

 

I wouldn't mind a small buff on the 113 (not that I'm complaining over its current state). :P


Edited by shishx_the_animal, 25 August 2017 - 08:48 AM.


STLR #9 Posted 25 August 2017 - 08:35 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 30827 battles
  • 736
  • [MIND] MIND
  • Member since:
    06-07-2013

View PostPrincess_Ema, on 25 August 2017 - 06:58 AM, said:

You think IS-4 gun is bad ? 113 gun is twice as bad , bloom is as big as my 24 inch monitor and even when fully aimed shell goes everywhere and your chance of hitting anything longer than 50~100 meters is pretty much 0 and even when engaging close combat you want to hit the E100 lower plate ? shell goes to the track , it is just bad and i was shocked to see actually it has worse dispersion than IS-4 which already is so crapand you can't hit anything with it . Even IS-7 gun is better than this pile of crap.

 

deluded.

leggasiini #10 Posted 25 August 2017 - 08:51 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 14130 battles
  • 6,191
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

>IS-4 gun is better than 113

 

hahahahahhaa

ahahahaha

aahahahahah

 

Spoiler

 

 


Edited by leggasiini, 25 August 2017 - 08:52 AM.


Unforgiving_Destiny #11 Posted 25 August 2017 - 08:52 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 48344 battles
  • 489
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    04-29-2011

View PostGotma, on 25 August 2017 - 07:04 AM, said:

 

That was not the question. The OP seems to believe that the 113 is underpowered because of said gun handling, which is so far from the truth I can't even find words.

 

It seems that you didn't play 113 or is-4 or one of those , is-4 even on paper (let alone in practice as you CAN see for yourself in battle) has better dispersion than 113 and 113 bloom ? oh god it is like i am aiming at something with T92 and aiming time feels like 5 seconds actually.

Gotma #12 Posted 25 August 2017 - 08:54 AM

    Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 51678 battles
  • 270
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    01-14-2011

View PostPrincess_Ema, on 25 August 2017 - 08:52 AM, said:

 

It seems that you didn't play 113 or is-4 or one of those , is-4 even on paper (let alone in practice as you CAN see for yourself in battle) has better dispersion than 113 and 113 bloom ? oh god it is like i am aiming at something with T92 and aiming time feels like 5 seconds actually.

 

Played both, that's why I can point out you are wrong :P



brumbarr #13 Posted 25 August 2017 - 08:58 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostPrincess_Ema, on 25 August 2017 - 08:52 AM, said:

 

It seems that you didn't play 113 or is-4 or one of those , is-4 even on paper (let alone in practice as you CAN see for yourself in battle) has better dispersion than 113 and 113 bloom ? oh god it is like i am aiming at something with T92 and aiming time feels like 5 seconds actually.

Dude, you are so wrong, did you even bother to look at the stats before posting?



Cobra6 #14 Posted 25 August 2017 - 10:10 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16332 battles
  • 15,763
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010

113 gun handling is fine, played it a *LOT* on the Sandbox server.

 

IS-4 gun handling is potato and needs improving.

 

Cobra 6



Kirk_Helmet #15 Posted 25 August 2017 - 11:03 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 37427 battles
  • 318
  • [PAPKO] PAPKO
  • Member since:
    10-25-2010
I know that some guns tend to shoot tennis balls rather than shells despite good stats (e.g. Grille 15 - at least my Grille 15) but it's hard to discuss with numbers and both 113 and WZ 111 5A have much better gun stats than russian tier X heavies. In fact if any tank needs a gun buff it would be IS-7 because either it is completely obsolete nowadays or WZ 111 5A is plain OP. 

sgtYester #16 Posted 25 August 2017 - 12:02 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 54377 battles
  • 1,652
  • [RANGF] RANGF
  • Member since:
    04-10-2011

View PostGotma, on 25 August 2017 - 08:04 AM, said:

 

That was not the question. The OP seems to believe that the 113 is underpowered because of said gun handling, which is so far from the truth I can't even find words.

 

113 gun is a turd.  u press mouse button...big BOOM!   and ur shell rolls out of the barrel into the ground.

 

gun handling is soo bad , its the only tier 10 i ever sold



Gotma #17 Posted 25 August 2017 - 12:17 PM

    Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 51678 battles
  • 270
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    01-14-2011

View PostsgtYester, on 25 August 2017 - 12:02 PM, said:

 

113 gun is a turd.  u press mouse button...big BOOM!   and ur shell rolls out of the barrel into the ground.

 

gun handling is soo bad , its the only tier 10 i ever sold

 

When was that? We are talking about the 113 we have for more than a year now, with better dpm, gun depression and GUN HANDLING.

 

All of a sudden it was one of the most used tanks in CW and SH. All people that didn't have it already started to grind it. Most people enjoyed/ are still enjoying it (apart from shishx obviously) and now you come and demand a buff for a highly competitive vehicle while there are way more pressing issues.

 

Just because some people claim their wrong facts a million times they don't become true all of a sudden.

 

Btw: Accuracy is better when the number is small (apart from russki tanks obv), it's not the same for the percentages in front of your crew members.


Edited by Gotma, 25 August 2017 - 12:18 PM.


brumbarr #18 Posted 25 August 2017 - 12:20 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostKirk_Helmet, on 25 August 2017 - 11:03 AM, said:

I know that some guns tend to shoot tennis balls rather than shells despite good stats (e.g. Grille 15 - at least my Grille 15) but it's hard to discuss with numbers and both 113 and WZ 111 5A have much better gun stats than russian tier X heavies. In fact if any tank needs a gun buff it would be IS-7 because either it is completely obsolete nowadays or WZ 111 5A is plain OP. 

The only thing the wz has over the is7 after 9.20 is 2s reload, gun handling will only be slighlty worse only.



sgtYester #19 Posted 25 August 2017 - 12:31 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 54377 battles
  • 1,652
  • [RANGF] RANGF
  • Member since:
    04-10-2011

View PostGotma, on 25 August 2017 - 08:54 AM, said:

 

Played both, that's why I can point out you are wrong :P

 

played both

 

ur wrong

:child:



brumbarr #20 Posted 25 August 2017 - 12:42 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostsgtYester, on 25 August 2017 - 12:31 PM, said:

 

played both

 

ur wrong

:child:

Except we have statistics to back us up, also:

 

I 3 marked both, you are wrong ;)






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users