Jump to content


is IS-7 still worth to buy?

IS-7

  • Please log in to reply
20 replies to this topic

Eure_Armut_k0tzt_mich_an #1 Posted 26 August 2017 - 01:26 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 22522 battles
  • 25
  • [ARMUT] ARMUT
  • Member since:
    03-25-2013

Hello fellow tankers,

 

the topic says it all.

 

Is the Is-7 still worth to buy? and is the playstyle different from the t-10?

 

Greetings

DS97



JocMeister #2 Posted 26 August 2017 - 01:27 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 21757 battles
  • 1,862
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    08-03-2015
IS-7 is great and will be even better after next patch. 

brumbarr #3 Posted 26 August 2017 - 01:34 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012
IS7 in a week will be very good.

TankkiPoju #4 Posted 26 August 2017 - 01:53 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 20014 battles
  • 6,192
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

I like IS-7 even now. Fairly mobile and 490 alpha. Turret made out of Stalinium. APCR as default ammo.



Hammerhead20 #5 Posted 26 August 2017 - 01:57 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 25370 battles
  • 1,688
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011

Yes, it's worth it.

 

Even at current condition this heavy tank is a "beast".



arildo81 #6 Posted 26 August 2017 - 02:04 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 43473 battles
  • 23
  • [KILTA] KILTA
  • Member since:
    11-25-2013
Excellent.

qpranger #7 Posted 26 August 2017 - 02:07 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 31449 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013
IS7 is almost as good as the Defender.

Spurtung #8 Posted 26 August 2017 - 02:16 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 61582 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostTankkiPoju, on 26 August 2017 - 02:53 PM, said:

APCR as default ammo.

:unsure:



sgtYester #9 Posted 26 August 2017 - 02:19 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 53400 battles
  • 1,516
  • [RANGF] RANGF
  • Member since:
    04-10-2011
its already slightly op, after next patch, it becomes a heavy medium with no cupola weakspot/ broken side armor, 

brumbarr #10 Posted 26 August 2017 - 02:22 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostsgtYester, on 26 August 2017 - 02:19 PM, said:

its already slightly op, after next patch, it becomes a heavy medium with no cupola weakspot/ broken side armor, 

 

its not OP at all, its the second weakest heavy tank ffs... 

if its so OP, how come you  do 800 dpg i nit?



xx984 #11 Posted 26 August 2017 - 04:03 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 52971 battles
  • 2,380
  • [GO-IN] GO-IN
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013

View Postbrumbarr, on 26 August 2017 - 01:22 PM, said:

 

its not OP at all, its the second weakest heavy tank ffs... 

if its so OP, how come you  do 800 dpg i nit?

 

Its not the second weakest, Although i dont think it is OP, its still pretty good. Id much rather be playing my IS-7 than a IS-4, FV215B, and Pz VII for example. 

brumbarr #12 Posted 26 August 2017 - 04:06 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View Postxx984, on 26 August 2017 - 04:03 PM, said:

 

Its not the second weakest, Although i dont think it is OP, its still pretty good. Id much rather be playing my IS-7 than a IS-4, FV215B, and Pz VII for example. 

 

I think its worse than the FV by quite a margin. I forgot about the PZ VII

xx984 #13 Posted 26 August 2017 - 04:09 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 52971 battles
  • 2,380
  • [GO-IN] GO-IN
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013

View Postbrumbarr, on 26 August 2017 - 03:06 PM, said:

 

I think its worse than the FV by quite a margin. I forgot about the PZ VII

 

FV Is not a bad tank, Ive had it researched for quite some time without buying it however. Played it on the test server abit. But I just prefer the IS-7, its that mix of decent mobility, good frontal armour, amazing turret armour and high alpha damage. Even with that new WZ-111 5A  i still rather play my IS-7, as the armour on the WZ compared to IS-7 doesn't seem all that great. Although im happy its getting buffs, not gonna say no to that! :great:

wsatnutter #14 Posted 26 August 2017 - 04:44 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Beta Tester
  • 24388 battles
  • 7,289
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    08-25-2010
Is the search function worth to use 

MarcoStrapone #15 Posted 26 August 2017 - 07:15 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 34057 battles
  • 712
  • [-GODS] -GODS
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013
after the buff its amazing tank.

sgtYester #16 Posted 27 August 2017 - 01:04 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 53400 battles
  • 1,516
  • [RANGF] RANGF
  • Member since:
    04-10-2011

View Postbrumbarr, on 26 August 2017 - 02:22 PM, said:

 

its not OP at all, its the second weakest heavy tank ffs... 

if its so OP, how come you  do 800 dpg i nit?

 

first t10 i got, played it maybe 4 times this year

 

and weak ?? is7 weak????  wtf are u smoking?

 

thirdly  800 damage per game?  where do u get ur stats from?, ur [edited]?   if u look ingame service record u can see i have 1775 avg damage in is7.

 

talk some actual sense, typical sealclubbing wn8 *edited*

 

http://www.noobmeter...barr/504393177/

 top tank T3 hmc  then tier 3 pz, then gold spamming in T54.

 

 


Edited by Jbnn, 28 August 2017 - 06:37 AM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks.


brumbarr #17 Posted 27 August 2017 - 01:20 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostsgtYester, on 27 August 2017 - 01:04 PM, said:

 

first t10 i got, played it maybe 4 times this year

 

and weak ?? is7 weak????  wtf are u smoking?

 

thirdly  800 damage per game?  where do u get ur stats from?, ur [edited]?   if u look ingame service record u can see i have 1775 avg damage in is7.

 

talk some actual sense, typical sealclubbing wn8 *edited*

 

http://www.noobmeter...barr/504393177/

 top tank T3 hmc  then tier 3 pz, then gold spamming in T54

 

 

I see, I read the total dmg instead of avg dmg, alright then you are not a bot, just really bad with 47% wr.

Sealclubbing? How am I sealclubbing when i suck in them and do better in high tier tanks.

And btw, I never fired a single gold shell in the T54, I 3 marked it with AP and the reason I played so may battles with it is because it leads to 2 tanks.

 

And yes, the IS7 isnt a great tank atm.

 



sgtYester #18 Posted 27 August 2017 - 04:43 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 53400 battles
  • 1,516
  • [RANGF] RANGF
  • Member since:
    04-10-2011

View Postbrumbarr, on 27 August 2017 - 01:20 PM, said:

 

I see, I read the total dmg instead of avg dmg, alright then you are not a bot, just really bad with 47% wr.

Sealclubbing? How am I sealclubbing when i suck in them and do better in high tier tanks.

And btw, I never fired a single gold shell in the T54, I 3 marked it with AP and the reason I played so may battles with it is because it leads to 2 tanks.

 

And yes, the IS7 isnt a great tank atm.

 

 

suck in them...56% win  58% win...  yeah right... nice one....  :harp:

 

and no gold shooting with T54...LOL  we believe u buddy sure we do..   just keep saying that to urself long enough when u press 2 button ..." i use ap ammo, this is just ap ammo"  :child:

 

 

is7 should not be buffed next patch. so many  other tanks deserve a buff before is7 should be considered

 

 


Edited by sgtYester, 27 August 2017 - 04:44 PM.


soul3ater #19 Posted 27 August 2017 - 04:50 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18669 battles
  • 635
  • Member since:
    07-27-2012

Is7 needed this upcoming buff.

 

I am glad they're buffing the aim time and dispersion, although I would like if they made the gold ammo pen 315 maybe 320.



brumbarr #20 Posted 27 August 2017 - 05:10 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostsgtYester, on 27 August 2017 - 04:43 PM, said:

 

suck in them...56% win  58% win...  yeah right... nice one....  :harp:

 

and no gold shooting with T54...LOL  we believe u buddy sure we do..   just keep saying that to urself long enough when u press 2 button ..." i use ap ammo, this is just ap ammo"  :child:

 

 

is7 should not be buffed next patch. so many  other tanks deserve a buff before is7 should be considered

 

 

 

I have like less than 2000 wn8 in them, compared to my high tier tanks that sucking.

 

I played those tank 30K battles ago when I  was like 16 years old and just played tanks I found fun and pewpew.

 

Well, you dotn have to believe me, but  its true.

 

And IS7 is FACTUALLY UP, it underperforms on every stat website. THe gun is BAD, the mobility is average and armor is OK. These are FACTS, you can look at tanks.gg and look at them themselfes, they are FACTS.







Also tagged with IS-7

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users