Jump to content


AMX 13 105 Thoughts and opinions?


  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

xx984 #1 Posted 27 August 2017 - 09:30 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 50845 battles
  • 2,066
  • [GO-IN] GO-IN
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013

Got my AMX 13 90 about 4-5 days ago, Currently about 70k XP away from the AMX 13 105, needed a high tier light tank for the personal missions and ive always liked the look of the 13 90, And ive been really enjoying it so far and will probably keep it after. But was wondering how similar the 105 plays to the 13 90 and wanted to know from the people who have one of these what its like? 

 

Thanks :)



brumbarr #2 Posted 27 August 2017 - 09:43 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,286
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

It is quite similar, you jsut get better burst dmg in less time.

I find it the best LT of the T10s, its  fast, good enough camo, goo enouhg VR since you cant mount rammer so you mount vents and you get an autoloader which is key in a LT imo, minimal exposure for max dmg.

 

I dont do as good in it as my BC, but I still find it a very fun tank and I feel like I am having an effect in battle shown by my  68% WR.



HunterXHunter8 #3 Posted 27 August 2017 - 09:44 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 33071 battles
  • 941
  • Member since:
    04-27-2013

its getting buffed after 9.20

should be decent then



xx984 #4 Posted 27 August 2017 - 09:45 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 50845 battles
  • 2,066
  • [GO-IN] GO-IN
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013

View Postbrumbarr, on 27 August 2017 - 08:43 PM, said:

It is quite similar, you jsut get better burst dmg in less time.

I find it the best LT of the T10s, its  fast, good enough camo, goo enouhg VR since you cant mount rammer so you mount vents and you get an autoloader which is key in a LT imo, minimal exposure for max dmg.

 

I dont do as good in it as my BC, but I still find it a very fun tank and I feel like I am having an effect in battle shown by my  68% WR.

 

Okay nice, Kinda looking forward to it :D especially since the light tank buffs that might be coming soon, thanks

Derethim #5 Posted 27 August 2017 - 09:58 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 16426 battles
  • 1,717
  • Member since:
    04-03-2012
I hope it's good, i'm not far away from it ^^

cro001 #6 Posted 27 August 2017 - 10:44 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27863 battles
  • 1,888
  • [MEME] MEME
  • Member since:
    10-21-2012
It's probably more of a sidegrade than actual tier 10.

Derethim #7 Posted 27 August 2017 - 11:13 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 16426 battles
  • 1,717
  • Member since:
    04-03-2012

View Postcro001, on 27 August 2017 - 10:44 PM, said:

It's probably more of a sidegrade than actual tier 10.

 

it can't carry on it's own very often, but it's a great support tank.

Spurtung #8 Posted 28 August 2017 - 12:29 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 60111 battles
  • 5,479
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View Postbrumbarr, on 27 August 2017 - 10:43 PM, said:

It is quite similar, you jsut get better burst dmg in less time.

I find it the best LT of the T10s, its  fast, good enough camo, goo enouhg VR since you cant mount rammer so you mount vents and you get an autoloader which is key in a LT imo, minimal exposure for max dmg.

 

I dont do as good in it as my BC, but I still find it a very fun tank and I feel like I am having an effect in battle shown by my  68% WR.

 

Unsure about the 3rd equipment. Got optics and vents, and thinking of vstab, but that aimtime...

cro001 #9 Posted 28 August 2017 - 12:32 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27863 battles
  • 1,888
  • [MEME] MEME
  • Member since:
    10-21-2012

View PostDerethim, on 27 August 2017 - 11:13 PM, said:

it can't carry on it's own very often, but it's a great support tank.

I don't know but judging by the stats, it's just marginal upgrade compared to AMX 13 90. ST-1 to IS-4 situation.

 

View PostSpurtung, on 28 August 2017 - 12:29 AM, said:

Unsure about the 3rd equipment. Got optics and vents, and thinking of vstab, but that aimtime...

You do realize VStabs cut down your aim time?



Derethim #10 Posted 28 August 2017 - 12:35 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 16426 battles
  • 1,717
  • Member since:
    04-03-2012

View Postcro001, on 28 August 2017 - 12:32 AM, said:

I don't know but judging by the stats, it's just marginal upgrade compared to AMX 13 90. ST-1 to IS-4 situation.

 

You do realize VStabs cut down your aim time?

 

Will see when I get to it too..

But T10 light tanks are a new thing, so maybe it'll get adjusted along with the others.



DorsVenabiIi #11 Posted 28 August 2017 - 12:38 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 20886 battles
  • 498
  • [BIBLE] BIBLE
  • Member since:
    03-31-2015
I tried it on test server. It turns soooo slowly, it's retarded. It's turret turns like a TD turret. I can't honestly see why people would play this pile of crap. I tried 13 90 as well, it was much more agile. 

Spurtung #12 Posted 28 August 2017 - 12:50 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 60111 battles
  • 5,479
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View Postcro001, on 28 August 2017 - 01:32 AM, said:

View PostSpurtung, on 28 August 2017 - 12:29 AM, said:

Unsure about the 3rd equipment. Got optics and vents, and thinking of vstab, but that aimtime...

You do realize VStabs cut down your aim time?

It cuts down where the reticle starts closing from, but it's the same aim time to fully close it.



cro001 #13 Posted 28 August 2017 - 01:02 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27863 battles
  • 1,888
  • [MEME] MEME
  • Member since:
    10-21-2012

View PostSpurtung, on 28 August 2017 - 12:50 AM, said:

It cuts down where the reticle starts closing from, but it's the same aim time to fully close it.

 

It's too late for me to google the stuff for you. It is proven numerous time that Vstabs outweigh GLD by a large margin.

Spurtung #14 Posted 28 August 2017 - 01:15 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 60111 battles
  • 5,479
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View Postcro001, on 28 August 2017 - 02:02 AM, said:

It's too late for me to google the stuff for you. It is proven numerous time that Vstabs outweigh GLD by a large margin.

What you claimed, you won't be able to prove no matter how much you try.

As per the Vstabs being a better choice than GLD, there are particular cases where it's not true, and this might be one of them.



cro001 #15 Posted 28 August 2017 - 01:48 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27863 battles
  • 1,888
  • [MEME] MEME
  • Member since:
    10-21-2012

View PostSpurtung, on 28 August 2017 - 01:15 AM, said:

What you claimed, you won't be able to prove no matter how much you try.

As per the Vstabs being a better choice than GLD, there are particular cases where it's not true, and this might be one of them.

 

If you're really want to go there:

https://www.youtube....h?v=dVsTHBcW6Ww

 

But [edited]whole community, you gotta be the special smart one and use GLD on tier 10 LT.

 


Spurtung #16 Posted 28 August 2017 - 06:25 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 60111 battles
  • 5,479
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View Postcro001, on 28 August 2017 - 02:48 AM, said:

But [edited]whole community, you gotta be the special smart one and use GLD on tier 10 LT.

I don't even know why I keep replying. For starters, I asked someone else, and I didn't even say they were the best choice or that I would equip that.

 

If you bother to go back, you'll read that I'm unsure what to equip in the 3rd slot and that this might be a case where GLD is preferable. If this, to you, is a sign that I'm sure about that option, I'm...sorry?



brumbarr #17 Posted 28 August 2017 - 07:51 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,286
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostSpurtung, on 28 August 2017 - 06:25 AM, said:

I don't even know why I keep replying. For starters, I asked someone else, and I didn't even say they were the best choice or that I would equip that.

 

If you bother to go back, you'll read that I'm unsure what to equip in the 3rd slot and that this might be a case where GLD is preferable. If this, to you, is a sign that I'm sure about that option, I'm...sorry?

Excepts its not, the aimtime is actually good, it has way better gun handling then the BC.

 

Also, most of the time you dont want to sit still aiming, you either shoot on the move or aim just a bit. In which case vstabs are clearly superior.


Edited by brumbarr, 28 August 2017 - 07:52 AM.


Spurtung #18 Posted 28 August 2017 - 08:11 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 60111 battles
  • 5,479
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View Postbrumbarr, on 28 August 2017 - 08:51 AM, said:

Excepts its not, the aimtime is actually good, it has way better gun handling then the BC.

 

Also, most of the time you dont want to sit still aiming, you either shoot on the move or aim just a bit. In which case vstabs are clearly superior.

 

Vstab is what I was thinking about anyway, but that aim time was putting me off it a bit.

brumbarr #19 Posted 28 August 2017 - 08:46 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,286
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostSpurtung, on 28 August 2017 - 08:11 AM, said:

 

Vstab is what I was thinking about anyway, but that aim time was putting me off it a bit.

 

AIm time is only 2.3, thats really not bad, most meds have 2.1, the BC has 2.7, that is much worse, and the 13 105 dispersion is pretty good.

alienslive #20 Posted 28 August 2017 - 10:20 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 82859 battles
  • 1,790
  • [MEME] MEME
  • Member since:
    09-20-2013

I like the 13 105 but the gun is full RNG.

In a full t10 battle the tank HP is really low. The gold pen against super heavies also can be problem.

 

This tank can be fun but playing the BC is much easier.

 

 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users