Jump to content


WoT Suggestions Thread

Suggestions what should WG implement new (and old) ideas

  • Please log in to reply
2643 replies to this topic

Snitzh_ #81 Posted 05 September 2017 - 07:26 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 12401 battles
  • 1
  • [KAZNA] KAZNA
  • Member since:
    06-27-2016

Its problably allrdy been surgested 1000 times, but i will do it again to hope that someone in Russia find the idea good.

 

Change the randomness roll on dmg and penn from now -+25 % to like -+10 or -+15 % so its more even. NOONE bennifits from the randomness that the -+25% brings. Not bad player nor good. Makes no sense at all.

Other games dont have this big variation in the RNG - why this have ? :S 



Hammerhead20 #82 Posted 06 September 2017 - 09:01 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 30324 battles
  • 2,254
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011

View Postnomadewolf, on 05 September 2017 - 05:24 PM, said:

Here are my suggestions to fix this game:

  • Ammo
    • Make premium ammo cost the same as regular ammo
    • Make premium ammo do less damage (for balancing purposes)
  • Premium tanks
    • Make all tanks possible to buy simply by grinding the game
    • Make all tanks possible to buy with Gold/Money (do the conversions)
    • Make all tanks possible to convert to Premium tanks (by paying Gold/Money, of course)
  • Tank skins
    • Introduce the concept of Epic Skins
    • An example of an Epic Skin would be the Blak Skin (Like Black Is-6 and T-34)
    • Another example would be the Patriot skin
    • This way every tank could have such a skin
    • Epic Skins would cost Gold/Money, of course (way more)

 

With this changes i think the need for the game to make money would be acommodated while making the game feel more fair. I would even argue that maybe WG would make even more money...

League Of Legends uses a similar model, which is where i drawn my inspiration for these changes.

 

What do you guys think?

 

I think Premium ammo should be only alowed to buy with Gold as it used to be...

 

Now, it's just too much spamming of this crap ammo with credits...



Kozzy #83 Posted 06 September 2017 - 09:25 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 42114 battles
  • 3,182
  • [RINSE] RINSE
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011

View PostHammerhead20, on 06 September 2017 - 08:01 AM, said:

 

I think Premium ammo should be only alowed to buy with Gold as it used to be...

 

Now, it's just too much spamming of this crap ammo with credits...

 

So you want the game to literally be pay to win?  It's a 'no' from me.

torloisk #84 Posted 06 September 2017 - 09:53 AM

    Corporal

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 31451 battles
  • 163
  • [SHOR] SHOR
  • Member since:
    04-06-2013

Based on ogremage suggestions:

 

  1. Fix matchmaking for tier 6 to 9 and platoons! Most most most important point!
  2. Remove small & corridor maps, at least northward of tier 7 or 8
  3. Expose assisted damage in stats API so that proper player rating can be implemented for scout players
  4. Don't have MM punish players for platooning by always placing them bottom tier. Instead ensure equal number of platooned players is in the battle.
  5. Rebalance arty to make sure it punishes campers and not those who play actively, like scouts for example
  6. Lower limit of arty per battle to 1 or 2
  7. Remove or rework improved equipment. It only makes the super-strong players even stronger.


leggasiini #85 Posted 06 September 2017 - 10:01 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 18102 battles
  • 6,483
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

14cm on Type 4/5 is still underperforming. It was ignored completely with 9.17.1 buffs. It should be "viable" option over derp, but it isnt, especially on the tier 10.

 

Type 4 Heavy

 

  • Gun 14 cm/50 3rd Year Type needs higher penetration (~255-260 mm on standard and ~300 mm on premium ammo)

 

Type 5 Heavy

 

  • Gun 14 cm/50 3rd Year Type needs higher penetration (~255-260 mm on standard and ~300 mm on premium ammo) and either slightly improved the gun handling or slightly increased DPM (only slightly, like ~5%)

 

The armor layout and derp needs to be changed too but since you seem to think those are "fine", I suggest this for now



WrekuiemForAMeme #86 Posted 06 September 2017 - 12:21 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 6603 battles
  • 42
  • Member since:
    12-02-2015

View Posttorloisk, on 06 September 2017 - 09:53 AM, said:

Based on ogremage suggestions:

 

  1. Fix matchmaking for tier 6 to 9 and platoons! Most most most important point!
  2. Remove small & corridor maps, at least northward of tier 7 or 8
  3. Expose assisted damage in stats API so that proper player rating can be implemented for scout players
  4. Don't have MM punish players for platooning by always placing them bottom tier. Instead ensure equal number of platooned players is in the battle.
  5. Rebalance arty to make sure it punishes campers and not those who play actively, like scouts for example
  6. Lower limit of arty per battle to 1 or 2
  7. Remove or rework improved equipment. It only makes the super-strong players even stronger.

This drove me nuts. No issue with bonds per se, but not allowing everyone to have them is a farce. Same with the Grand Battle game mode, catering to the elite and ignoring the developing players. This is not balance, WG...


Edited by Wrekuiem, 06 September 2017 - 02:42 PM.


trland #87 Posted 06 September 2017 - 01:17 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14305 battles
  • 222
  • [EKHUN] EKHUN
  • Member since:
    02-14-2012

View PostAikl, on 04 September 2017 - 11:40 AM, said:

 

While the suggestion for increasing cost of fooling around in T10 certainly has its use even now, it's meant as a follow-up to ZlatanArKung's proposal for removing premium ammo - it's hardly a secret that the main point of premium ammo (from WG's side) is to have a giant credit sink.

 

definitely has, I rarely use the IS-4 for that reason. 

The suggestion that gold should be removed.. that is going for very log tume. I'm in the position of it should rather be limited avaliable for some % of the normal ammo, because there are tanks (A-20, M4 Stuart, T-43, the Churches, Type 58 just to mention some), that can't live without gold. Or rework them, whatever just do something with that.



Other suggestion: for stock tanks limited MM. Tanks with first Tracks, not best gun should be less on bottom. Tanks that only radio or engine have stock should have normal MM. maybe stock engine on light tanks not, but this is minor thing. Main arguement is that with some not fully upgraded tanks are useless on bottom (even on top) so this limit would make the grind easier. And yes, not everyone can  afford to unlock every part for a just researched tank from free xp especially when there are 25 tanks in garage. 
 

EllemennT #88 Posted 06 September 2017 - 03:20 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 41910 battles
  • 1,976
  • [DSTAR] DSTAR
  • Member since:
    01-05-2015

1. Further improve map rotation and at the same time make sure you stick to what was agreed a while ago - that some maps (Kharkow, Windstorm) have limited appearance. I see them way too often since like 2 patches (they are frequently in the queue).

2. Remove small maps from tier 8+ battles (Mines, Ensk). It's frustrating to play them in tier 10 in any vehicle, except of maybe heavies.

3. Block XVM values from being displayed in battle. It only makes the game even more toxic.



WrekuiemForAMeme #89 Posted 06 September 2017 - 03:21 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 6603 battles
  • 42
  • Member since:
    12-02-2015

Forgot 2 others

- can we have a report addition to include deliberate suicide? Between the arty and Swedish TD drivers, it's more frequent now than I've ever seen

- XVM only available in the garage, not in game

 

edit; and another one! Link maps to tank types, i.e. less city maps for Lights etc


Edited by Wrekuiem, 06 September 2017 - 03:25 PM.


ZlatanArKung #90 Posted 06 September 2017 - 09:07 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1537 battles
  • 5,328
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View PostHammerhead20, on 06 September 2017 - 09:01 AM, said:

 

I think Premium ammo should be only alowed to buy with Gold as it used to be...

 

Now, it's just too much spamming of this crap ammo with credits...

 

Which would be going from a more hidden and secret p2w to an open p2w.



Slyspy #91 Posted 07 September 2017 - 12:04 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 14731 battles
  • 17,503
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-07-2011

View PostZlatanArKung, on 06 September 2017 - 09:07 PM, said:

 

Which would be going from not p2w to an actually p2w.

 

FTFY.

ZlatanArKung #92 Posted 07 September 2017 - 05:22 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1537 battles
  • 5,328
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View PostSlyspy, on 07 September 2017 - 12:04 AM, said:

 

FTFY.

 

You can claim Defender is P2W. 

Also, since there is a need for premium ammo in current gameplay, you need good way to earn credits, which is via premium tanks/premium time.



RazielJr #93 Posted 07 September 2017 - 05:17 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 36081 battles
  • 21
  • [TMM] TMM
  • Member since:
    10-19-2012

Wipe stats and give option to hide your stats.

Then you could sell statwipes for 2000gold.



Igor_BL #94 Posted 07 September 2017 - 05:43 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 42337 battles
  • 1,558
  • Member since:
    06-10-2015
My mistake.

Edited by Igor_BL, 07 September 2017 - 05:52 PM.


R4z #95 Posted 07 September 2017 - 10:08 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 15171 battles
  • 2
  • Member since:
    11-13-2011

I have an important easily solvable suggestion/request.

 

I really want you to notice this.

 

I have been playing lights for a long time ago and I have noticed that it does not worth to use them for their basic role: Spotting.

 

I experienced that somebody in the team does 2000 damage worth more XP in the team score than spotting 5000-6000.

 

And this is a huge problem that needs to be fixed.



Kozzy #96 Posted 08 September 2017 - 08:43 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 42114 battles
  • 3,182
  • [RINSE] RINSE
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011

View PostR4z, on 07 September 2017 - 09:08 PM, said:

I have an important easily solvable suggestion/request.

 

I really want you to notice this.

 

I have been playing lights for a long time ago and I have noticed that it does not worth to use them for their basic role: Spotting.

 

I experienced that somebody in the team does 2000 damage worth more XP in the team score than spotting 5000-6000.

 

And this is a huge problem that needs to be fixed.

 

I agree 100% BUT WG has already implied that scouting is not an important part of the game and light tanks aren't really about supporting other tanks.  Also, when was the last time a map was added where spotting was a favourable, well utilised mechanic to employ?

Hammerhead20 #97 Posted 08 September 2017 - 08:56 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 30324 battles
  • 2,254
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011

View PostKozzy, on 06 September 2017 - 11:25 AM, said:

 

So you want the game to literally be pay to win?  It's a 'no' from me.

 

So now this game is not "P2W" if you can buy Premium ammo for credits?

 

But if you change back to Gold, it will definitely become a "P2W" game?

 

Nevermind... this game is already a "P2W" game...


Edited by Hammerhead20, 08 September 2017 - 09:02 AM.


Kozzy #98 Posted 08 September 2017 - 09:01 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 42114 battles
  • 3,182
  • [RINSE] RINSE
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011

View PostHammerhead20, on 08 September 2017 - 07:56 AM, said:

 

This game is already "P2W".

 

You can win without paying;)

Hammerhead20 #99 Posted 08 September 2017 - 09:16 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 30324 battles
  • 2,254
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011

View PostKozzy, on 08 September 2017 - 11:01 AM, said:

 

Sure I can win (and I'm not paying anything), others too.

 

But how many players there who actually don't spend any money at all on this game?

 

Most likely only a few numbers...



Igor_BL #100 Posted 08 September 2017 - 12:14 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 42337 battles
  • 1,558
  • Member since:
    06-10-2015
I've spend 1 euro (or was that 2?) on that one  tree decoration special... To make things worse, i got that particular decoration in last game anyways.

Edited by Igor_BL, 08 September 2017 - 12:15 PM.





4 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users