Jump to content


O-I Exp - erm....


  • Please log in to reply
55 replies to this topic

Disorientated #1 Posted 30 August 2017 - 12:50 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 30442 battles
  • 56
  • [RED_S] RED_S
  • Member since:
    08-26-2012

What in the hell have they done to this tank!?

 

Totally ruined. Unplayable in fact.

 

Have sold it after 2 games. GJ Wargaming, way to change things for no reason.



commer #2 Posted 30 August 2017 - 12:54 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38080 battles
  • 1,995
  • Member since:
    06-14-2011
You mean a tank where you could pull 1200 dpg in a t5 and some top players pulled 1500 dpg is not a reason for a nerf? People pulling 70%+ WR also are not a reason? You are a good player. Please stop crying about a broken tank being rebalanced

leggasiini #3 Posted 30 August 2017 - 12:55 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 9619 battles
  • 5,807
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

View PostDisorientated, on 30 August 2017 - 01:50 PM, said:

GJ Wargaming, way to change things for no reason.

 

300 alpha with 8.5 sec reload with highest health in its tier, -10 depression, 40kph top speed, ability to kill same tier tanks with a single ram and best view range in its tier doesnt deserve to be nerfed?

 

I played like 1000 battles with it before I rerolled and I must say that it was broken as hell and deserved to be whacked hard



commer #4 Posted 30 August 2017 - 12:56 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38080 battles
  • 1,995
  • Member since:
    06-14-2011

View Postleggasiini, on 30 August 2017 - 12:55 PM, said:

 

300 alpha with 8.5 sec reload with highest health in its tier, -10 depression, 40kph top speed, ability to kill same tier tanks with a single ram and best view range in its tier doesnt deserve to be nerfed?

 

I played like 1000 battles with it before I rerolled and I must say that it was broken as hell and deserved to be whacked hard

 

Funny thing is he is pulling more DPG in his than in the O-I and Arl44 but yeah belenced comrade.

Disorientated #5 Posted 30 August 2017 - 12:57 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 30442 battles
  • 56
  • [RED_S] RED_S
  • Member since:
    08-26-2012

The tank already had a nerf a few patches ago. It was perfectly fine and in no way OP like the T67 still is after all this time.

 

Its now so bad, it may as well be removed from the game.



wsatnutter #6 Posted 30 August 2017 - 12:57 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Beta Tester
  • 23990 battles
  • 7,017
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    08-25-2010

View PostDisorientated, on 30 August 2017 - 11:50 AM, said:

What in the hell have they done to this tank!?

 

Totally ruined. Unplayable in fact.

 

Have sold it after 2 games. GJ Wargaming, way to change things for no reason.

 

oh dear the statpadder is weeping my condolences not

Disorientated #7 Posted 30 August 2017 - 01:01 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 30442 battles
  • 56
  • [RED_S] RED_S
  • Member since:
    08-26-2012

View Postwsatnutter, on 30 August 2017 - 11:57 AM, said:

 

oh dear the statpadder is weeping my condolences not

 

eh??  lol

 

[edited]like you really make me chuckle. Thanks for cheering up my otherwise boring Wednesday.



Thejagdpanther #8 Posted 30 August 2017 - 01:04 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 33033 battles
  • 4,244
  • [TKBS] TKBS
  • Member since:
    07-16-2012

For sure he has a point.

T67 was and it is more broken than OIexp.



leggasiini #9 Posted 30 August 2017 - 01:05 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 9619 battles
  • 5,807
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

View PostDisorientated, on 30 August 2017 - 01:57 PM, said:

The tank already had a nerf a few patches ago. 

 

It got nerfed from super OP to just very OP so yea 

 

View PostDisorientated, on 30 August 2017 - 01:57 PM, said:

It was perfectly fine

 

No it wasnt in any way



Ogroid #10 Posted 30 August 2017 - 01:06 PM

    Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 31404 battles
  • 226
  • Member since:
    09-01-2010

View PostDisorientated, on 30 August 2017 - 11:50 AM, said:

What in the hell have they done to this tank!?

 

Totally ruined. Unplayable in fact.

 

Have sold it after 2 games. GJ Wargaming, way to change things for no reason.

 

I was about to have a moan but all is not lost, Radley Walters first game post nerf. Kinda shut me up. Easy game but hey. Actually prefer 75mm with quick reload...

http://wotreplays.com/site/3793004#kharkov-ogroid-o-i_experimental



Disorientated #11 Posted 30 August 2017 - 01:07 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 30442 battles
  • 56
  • [RED_S] RED_S
  • Member since:
    08-26-2012
There were many tanks that were better. M4, T34, T67, that German m4 style tank.... loads.

commer #12 Posted 30 August 2017 - 01:07 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38080 battles
  • 1,995
  • Member since:
    06-14-2011

View PostDisorientated, on 30 August 2017 - 12:57 PM, said:

The tank already had a nerf a few patches ago. It was perfectly fine and in no way OP like the T67 still is after all this time.

 

Its now so bad, it may as well be removed from the game.

 

Sorry but no. Itwas still MUCH better than most. The only difference is now players like you pull 70% wrs on them and not players like me. I played it post nerf on NA and jesus it was still super easy to play. It simply went from Super OP to just OP. You're a decent player, why do you feel the need to pad? If you want a tank to relieve the stress get the 13 57 or type64. 

FluffyRedFox #13 Posted 30 August 2017 - 01:08 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 21564 battles
  • 7,692
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    12-05-2012

OI Exp was perfectly fine pre nerf?

What the [edited]have you been smoking



Balc0ra #14 Posted 30 August 2017 - 01:10 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 62806 battles
  • 14,399
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View PostDisorientated, on 30 August 2017 - 12:50 PM, said:

GJ Wargaming, way to change things for no reason.

 

So this was a balanced tank then in your opinion? Faster then most mediums, more effective armor then what most can pen. Can kill just about any tier 5 in 8 seconds. Sure... balanced.

Edited by Balc0ra, 30 August 2017 - 01:15 PM.


Spurtung #15 Posted 30 August 2017 - 01:13 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 60111 battles
  • 5,479
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

40km/h on a 100t platform in tier 5. What could possibly go wrong?

 

Talking about ramming potential only, not even gonna bring the gun to this argument.



commer #16 Posted 30 August 2017 - 01:15 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38080 battles
  • 1,995
  • Member since:
    06-14-2011

View PostSpurtung, on 30 August 2017 - 01:13 PM, said:

40km/h on a 100t platform in tier 5. What could possibly go wrong?

 

Talking about ramming potential only, not even gonna bring the gun to this argument.

 

Ramming is the smallest problem. 3rd best alpha in tier with great hp and great speed and not a totally crap dpm and handling? 

Edited by commer, 30 August 2017 - 01:15 PM.


Coldspell #17 Posted 30 August 2017 - 01:34 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 18583 battles
  • 2,095
  • Member since:
    08-12-2013
O-I exp was balanced? Seriously whatever medication your on I want it.

superfly2000 #18 Posted 30 August 2017 - 01:42 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 76582 battles
  • 1,468
  • [SFLY] SFLY
  • Member since:
    12-25-2011

OI exp was not really overpowered...it wasn't...but also it wasn't a real heavy...

 

What most nabs dont understand that some tanks can be SITUATONALLY strong. For example in the case of a small city map or narrow corridor indeed they ARE stronk...but in most other cases they ARE NOT. But its easy for a nab to meet the japaneese tanks where they are strong and then come here and scream OP OP OP OP OP....it is so easy...


 

Anyway...OIexp wasn't like the rest of them...


 

Also this doesn't really have to be a nerf. I just tried it...they made it slow as hell...but perhaps the armor can bounce some shots now? The guns seem ok.


 

However I have never seen the stock gun being of higher tier then any of the following guns...this feels like something "new"...or rather...a bug if you ask me...


Edited by superfly2000, 30 August 2017 - 01:43 PM.


FluffyRedFox #19 Posted 30 August 2017 - 01:44 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 21564 battles
  • 7,692
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    12-05-2012

View Postsuperfly2000, on 30 August 2017 - 12:42 PM, said:

OI exp was not really overpowered

ha ha ha ha 

no.



commer #20 Posted 30 August 2017 - 01:50 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38080 battles
  • 1,995
  • Member since:
    06-14-2011

View Postsuperfly2000, on 30 August 2017 - 01:42 PM, said:

OI exp was not really overpowered...it wasn't...but also it wasn't a real heavy...

 

What most nabs dont understand that some tanks can be SITUATONALLY strong. For example in the case of a small city map or narrow corridor indeed they ARE stronk...but in most other cases they ARE NOT. But its easy for a nab to meet the japaneese tanks where they are strong and then come here and scream OP OP OP OP OP....it is so easy...


 

Anyway...OIexp wasn't like the rest of them...


 

Also this doesn't really have to be a nerf. I just tried it...they made it slow as hell...but perhaps the armor can bounce some shots now? The guns seem ok.


 

However I have never seen the stock gun being of higher tier then any of the following guns...this feels like something "new"...or rather...a bug if you ask me...

 

Those 65%+ noobs at wotlabs where 99% of the forumites admit it's OP but some permateal will call them "nab".

 

This tank didn't have to play city. It was essentially a med with a td gun and ht hp.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users