Jump to content


9.20 is awsome


  • Please log in to reply
26 replies to this topic

Unicums_Tast3_G00D #1 Posted 30 August 2017 - 02:37 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 17280 battles
  • 107
  • Member since:
    07-28-2011

This new patch is awesome :) i haven't lost a single ammo rack or module yet :) 

P.S. the batchat looks awesome GJ WG :) 



the_nebuchadnezzar #2 Posted 30 August 2017 - 03:15 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 43749 battles
  • 864
  • Member since:
    08-19-2013
Just... great patch. The feeling when you get clipped by a Foch 50B... just priceless! 

imendars #3 Posted 30 August 2017 - 03:24 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 10939 battles
  • 1,071
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    04-17-2014

View Postthe_nebuchadnezzar, on 30 August 2017 - 05:15 PM, said:

Just... great patch. The feeling when you get clipped by a Foch 50B... just priceless! 

 

You made me love my Foch 50B even before i have tried it out. :trollface:

Thanks!


Edited by imendars, 30 August 2017 - 03:24 PM.


Entr0py #4 Posted 30 August 2017 - 04:40 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 17409 battles
  • 88
  • Member since:
    08-03-2013
So awesome! So glad they buffed the IS7 and Object 140, no one was playing those weak vehicles so it's nice to see WG showing the underplayed and underpowered Russian tier 10s some love!

ortega456 #5 Posted 30 August 2017 - 04:48 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 58026 battles
  • 952
  • Member since:
    06-08-2012

View Postthe_nebuchadnezzar, on 30 August 2017 - 03:15 PM, said:

Just... great patch. The feeling when you get clipped by a Foch 50B... just priceless! 

 

Foch 155 is still a piece of junk and belongs in a museum not on the fkn battlefield. Dont understand why they can't adequatly buff this turd...

Dennyb #6 Posted 30 August 2017 - 04:55 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 21178 battles
  • 1,936
  • Member since:
    12-14-2012

View Postortega456, on 30 August 2017 - 03:48 PM, said:

Foch 155 is still a piece of junk and belongs in a museum not on the fkn battlefield. Dont understand why they can't adequatly buff this turd...

 

Foch 50B, not Foch 155.

ortega456 #7 Posted 30 August 2017 - 04:57 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 58026 battles
  • 952
  • Member since:
    06-08-2012

View PostDennyb, on 30 August 2017 - 04:55 PM, said:

 

Foch 50B, not Foch 155.

>>>I<<< am talking about 155 that its piece of crapcompared to 50b.



Sfinski #8 Posted 30 August 2017 - 04:59 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 29704 battles
  • 1,987
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013
If only the MM were fixed like they promised, but NOPE. Screw us!

HanZi #9 Posted 30 August 2017 - 05:01 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 43865 battles
  • 194
  • [-NFD-] -NFD-
  • Member since:
    02-26-2011

View PostPanzerfaust123, on 30 August 2017 - 02:37 PM, said:

This new patch is awesome :) i haven't lost a single ammo rack or module yet :) 

P.S. the batchat looks awesome GJ WG :) 

 

No its not.

Dennyb #10 Posted 30 August 2017 - 05:03 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 21178 battles
  • 1,936
  • Member since:
    12-14-2012

View Postortega456, on 30 August 2017 - 03:57 PM, said:

>>>I<<< am talking about 155 that its piece of crapcompared to 50b.

 

Oh right, thought you were mistaking them for each other.

 

View PostSfinski, on 30 August 2017 - 03:59 PM, said:

If only the MM were fixed like they promised, but NOPE. Screw us!

 

 

What is wrong with the MM? Is it the new format they came out with a while ago?



ortega456 #11 Posted 30 August 2017 - 05:05 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 58026 battles
  • 952
  • Member since:
    06-08-2012

View PostDennyb, on 30 August 2017 - 05:03 PM, said:

 

Oh right, thought you were mistaking them for each other.

 

 

 

What is wrong with the MM? Is it the new format they came out with a while ago?

 

Yeah, that's true however still tier 8 mm is pretty bad.

 

I've played I think 45 games. I was (except for tier 10) top tier only twice playing mostly tier 8. It's so frustrating if you wanna grind credits but end up against IS-7s, Mauss, VKs and so on and have to fire gold to win and therefore don't earn credits anymore...it's so fkn screwed.



Bucifel #12 Posted 30 August 2017 - 05:08 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27716 battles
  • 1,373
  • [3NRGY] 3NRGY
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013
its a decent patch with enough good changes...but still contain some crap changes and bad...like penetration nerfs, removing even more weakpoints and overbuffing some armor (meds) !

Edited by Bucifel, 30 August 2017 - 05:09 PM.


nc30_guy #13 Posted 30 August 2017 - 05:43 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 22526 battles
  • 251
  • Member since:
    12-23-2011
Introduce new bigger maps most of your player base will never see real smart move.

brisha #14 Posted 30 August 2017 - 05:45 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 15242 battles
  • 1,481
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    10-11-2012
Ah was waiting to give this patch a try but as they haven't fixed the MM then roll on the next patch, it looks like I keep Steam in business for now.

cmgamesro #15 Posted 30 August 2017 - 05:48 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 11204 battles
  • 539
  • [DS-RO] DS-RO
  • Member since:
    11-16-2015
wg logic, buffs extra popular tanks like IS-7 so community will be splited in 2, those who have the monstruosity, and those who get rekt by it. nice wg

Edited by cmgamesro, 30 August 2017 - 05:48 PM.


Aikl #16 Posted 30 August 2017 - 05:49 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 25141 battles
  • 3,988
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

View Postbrisha, on 30 August 2017 - 04:45 PM, said:

Ah was waiting to give this patch a try but as they haven't fixed the MM then roll on the next patch, it looks like I keep Steam in business for now.

 

Well, Grand Battles might remove enough T10 from the game to make T8 a bit more liveable, though gaining bonds in T10-only games (and GBs itself) probably means more people playing them - especially know that the IS-7 and 140 has been buffed.

That is, unless GBs and T10-only games are meant to be more of a new standard; bonds being the way of getting a pat on the back when you can't beat up seven T8 tanks in your Maus. :(

 

View Postcmgamesro, on 30 August 2017 - 04:48 PM, said:

wg logic, buffs extra popular tanks like IS-7 so community will be splited in 2, those who have the monstruosity, and those who get rekt by it. nice wg
 

 

The IS-7 was hardly a threat to many T9 heavy tanks, and the armor and 'hard' gun stats are untouched. There are improvements to engine power and dispersion stats, which it seems to deserve on basis of being a 'heavium' - in particular now that we have superheavies in the game, which are most limited in top speed. Lack of top speed is not exactly a deal breaker for a heavy tank.

 

FWIW: IS-7 still has the same DPM as a T-10, and I'm pretty sure it's not faster still. Impenetrable turret? Type 5 and arty laughs when it nukes the soup bowl. Aside from Russian Space(d) ArmourTM, the hull armor isn't that worrisome either. Through the E-75, Mauschen and T-10 grind the IS-7 was less bothersome than even some T9 tanks. :rolleyes:

 

(Not entirely sure if it even should have 0.06 dispersion on turning the turret, but that seems  to be a "feature" of Russian heavies now - and arguably makes it a lot less annoying to lead shots, again fitting somewhat into 'heavium'.)


Edited by Aikl, 30 August 2017 - 05:57 PM.


soul3ater #17 Posted 30 August 2017 - 05:50 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18438 battles
  • 559
  • [OMNIA] OMNIA
  • Member since:
    07-27-2012
IS7 was under performing compared to the other tier 10 heavies and it got a decent buff...do you guys complain about everything for the sake of it?

spamhamstar #18 Posted 30 August 2017 - 05:56 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 64301 battles
  • 1,244
  • [LLAY] LLAY
  • Member since:
    12-02-2012

View Postsoul3ater, on 30 August 2017 - 04:50 PM, said:

...do you guys complain about everything for the sake of it?

 

You must be new here if you're asking that, welcome :trollface:

commer #19 Posted 30 August 2017 - 05:57 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38080 battles
  • 1,995
  • Member since:
    06-14-2011

View PostSfinski, on 30 August 2017 - 04:59 PM, said:

If only the MM were fixed like they promised, but NOPE. Screw us!

 

You can't get bad mm when you can't log into the game. FIXED

Aikl #20 Posted 30 August 2017 - 05:59 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 25141 battles
  • 3,988
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

View Postsoul3ater, on 30 August 2017 - 04:50 PM, said:

IS7 was under performing compared to the other tier 10 heavies and it got a decent buff...do you guys complain about everything for the sake of it?

 

WG's track record of "how to buff tanks" isn't exactly grounds for assuming that the IS-7 got anything close to a sensible buff, and there are not that many people who knows how to check the "hidden" stats anyway.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users