Jump to content


Farewell AMX 30 1er prototype


  • Please log in to reply
73 replies to this topic

stderr #61 Posted 04 September 2017 - 04:11 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 23506 battles
  • 83
  • Member since:
    02-08-2014

View PostJocMeister, on 04 September 2017 - 03:08 PM, said:

 

T-54 is terribly overrated. Only thing where it really shines is 330 HEAT pen. Rest of it is just meh.

 

lol... never mind.
 


JocMeister #62 Posted 04 September 2017 - 04:31 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 25653 battles
  • 2,370
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    08-03-2015

View Poststderr, on 04 September 2017 - 04:11 PM, said:

 

lol... never mind.
 

 

Care to elaborate a bit? 

brumbarr #63 Posted 04 September 2017 - 04:49 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View Poststderr, on 04 September 2017 - 04:09 PM, said:

 

We're discussing subjective things here. You think it got everything with the patch, and I think it lost everything in the patch.

 

 

No its not subjective.

The amx is a better tank, thats a fact. Whether you do better in it is subjective. Wether the tank is better isnt.



Derethim #64 Posted 04 September 2017 - 05:14 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 18476 battles
  • 2,057
  • Member since:
    04-03-2012
They should bring it back.. it was the onlly relevant sniper med.

stderr #65 Posted 04 September 2017 - 05:23 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 23506 battles
  • 83
  • Member since:
    02-08-2014

View Postbrumbarr, on 04 September 2017 - 03:49 PM, said:

 

No its not subjective.

The amx is a better tank, thats a fact. Whether you do better in it is subjective. Wether the tank is better isnt.

 

Maybe we should discuss the semantics in another forum.

 


ClassicFrog #66 Posted 04 September 2017 - 07:59 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 46687 battles
  • 2,998
  • Member since:
    04-05-2012

View Postbrumbarr, on 31 August 2017 - 11:40 AM, said:

Its by far the best t9 med, no other has that combo of dpm, gumhaning and penetration.

 

Haning the gums has to be the best feature brought by 9.20 update.



brumbarr #67 Posted 04 September 2017 - 09:33 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostClassicFrog, on 04 September 2017 - 07:59 PM, said:

 

Haning the gums has to be the best feature brought by 9.20 update.

 

Its not a bug, its a feature!

Zodiac1960s #68 Posted 04 September 2017 - 11:26 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 39731 battles
  • 944
  • Member since:
    03-27-2011
I got this tank yesterday.  Expected a great tank and it's even better than that (for me at least)
Don't even have the last engine yet and love it. Keeper for sure.

The_Georgian_One #69 Posted 05 September 2017 - 07:08 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 39021 battles
  • 1,815
  • [KOFN] KOFN
  • Member since:
    01-05-2015

My few battles since last patch have been over 5k combined each. Usually with around 4k damage. The tank is super strong. On the other hand...it was strong before the change.

 

Do I like it? Hell yes! Though it's not difficult to see the impact of the pen and accuracy nerf. Did I like the previous version? Hell yes! And I will miss it.

 

King is dead, long live the king.


Edited by The_Georgian_One, 05 September 2017 - 07:08 AM.


ZlatanArKung #70 Posted 05 September 2017 - 07:20 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1536 battles
  • 5,217
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014
Pen nerfs are pretty irrelevant changes imo, since you always have those premium rounds if you need to make up for it

So the nerf was in accuracy and shell velocity for gun handling and DPM.
A pretty good trade off.

If prem ammo was removed, the trade off would be more debatable.

Bucifel #71 Posted 05 September 2017 - 04:09 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 32963 battles
  • 1,373
  • [QUIET] QUIET
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013

View Postbrumbarr, on 31 August 2017 - 12:40 PM, said:

Its by far the best t9 med, no other has that combo of dpm, gumhaning and penetration.

 

except the penetration wich was just nerfed...

or if you talk about Gold...NO THX !

 

and after that accuracy too...



alienslive #72 Posted 05 September 2017 - 04:17 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 92790 battles
  • 1,817
  • Member since:
    09-20-2013

View PostZlatanArKung, on 05 September 2017 - 06:20 AM, said:

Pen nerfs are pretty irrelevant changes imo, since you always have those premium rounds if you need to make up for it

So the nerf was in accuracy and shell velocity for gun handling and DPM.
A pretty good trade off.

If prem ammo was removed, the trade off would be more debatable.

 

I more liked the old version with higher pen and faster shell. It was one of the tanks that not really needed to shoot gold.

brumbarr #73 Posted 05 September 2017 - 04:56 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View Postalienslive, on 05 September 2017 - 04:17 PM, said:

 

I more liked the old version with higher pen and faster shell. It was one of the tanks that not really needed to shoot gold.

 

But if you liked that tank, you can play the leo PTA. The reason they changed it is because we basicly had 2 the same tanks in game.

brumbarr #74 Posted 05 September 2017 - 04:58 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostBucifel, on 05 September 2017 - 04:09 PM, said:

 

except the penetration wich was just nerfed...

or if you talk about Gold...NO THX !

 

and after that accuracy too...

 

I said no other tank has the same combo of dpm, gun handling and good pen.

Tanks with good dpm usualy have bad pen  or gun handling, T54 for example.

 The amx gets top dpm and gun handling and still has good pen. 248 is good. Its not the best, but still good.  E50, patton, T54, T54e1, those have bad pen, the amx does not.






3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users