Jump to content


IS6 , KV5 , T34-3 , T95E2 etc ..we are waiting for theirs buff


  • Please log in to reply
20 replies to this topic

ValkyrionX #1 Posted 31 August 2017 - 08:57 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 45431 battles
  • 1,113
  • [T4K3] T4K3
  • Member since:
    02-07-2015
read the title

Sir_Bad #2 Posted 31 August 2017 - 09:43 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 45212 battles
  • 495
  • Member since:
    10-08-2011
Thanks for this totally new idea, that was mentioned never before on these forums. I also find it very nice of you, that every little detail of your proposal/idea was explained in your post.

KLguns #3 Posted 31 August 2017 - 09:49 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 47631 battles
  • 2,012
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-07-2012

Yep, its needs a buff: http://wot-record.com/replay/39761/klguns_kv_5_still_stronk

 

7k damage blocked is just not enough for a T8...



shishx_the_animal #4 Posted 31 August 2017 - 09:52 AM

    Colonel

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 31072 battles
  • 3,861
  • [MEME] MEME
  • Member since:
    04-06-2013
Keep waiting buddy.

STLR #5 Posted 31 August 2017 - 10:07 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 31009 battles
  • 737
  • [MIND] MIND
  • Member since:
    06-07-2013

View PostSir_Bad, on 31 August 2017 - 09:43 AM, said:

Thanks for this totally new idea, that was mentioned never before on these forums. I also find it very nice of you, that every little detail of your proposal/idea was explained in your post.

 

Actually his intention is quite good :D 

Junglist_ #6 Posted 31 August 2017 - 10:12 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 37417 battles
  • 1,352
  • Member since:
    06-17-2013
But if they would buff these obsolete machines that you already own, how would they sell the new copy and paste new prems like Defender or T26E5?

commer #7 Posted 31 August 2017 - 11:10 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38082 battles
  • 1,995
  • Member since:
    06-14-2011

View PostKLguns, on 31 August 2017 - 09:49 AM, said:

Yep, its needs a buff: http://wot-record.com/replay/39761/klguns_kv_5_still_stronk

 

7k damage blocked is just not enough for a T8...

 

Strong logic. One good game = good tank. So The Churchill GC is also awesome.

Igor_BL #8 Posted 31 August 2017 - 11:13 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 40203 battles
  • 1,399
  • [GX] GX
  • Member since:
    06-10-2015

View Postcommer, on 31 August 2017 - 11:10 AM, said:

 

Strong logic. One good game = good tank.


Sometimes, you dont need even that one game.
 


Edited by Igor_BL, 31 August 2017 - 11:17 AM.


shishx_the_animal #9 Posted 31 August 2017 - 11:32 AM

    Colonel

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 31072 battles
  • 3,861
  • [MEME] MEME
  • Member since:
    04-06-2013

View PostIgor_BL, on 31 August 2017 - 10:13 AM, said:


Sometimes, you dont need even that one game.
 

 

:hiding:

Balc0ra #10 Posted 31 August 2017 - 11:36 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 66549 battles
  • 16,588
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

Well IS-6, KV-5 was said to be next patch a few months ago. Issue is that they still don't know if they are gonna remove the limited MM and give the gun a huge buff and give refunds if people want it. Or keep it and give it a minor buff and keep the limited MM. As WG said 2 days ago "There are a few ideas on how to rebalance the KV-5", and a few days before that "As for the vehicles with preferential matchmaking, we’re working on different solutions on how to tackle this situation, but we haven’t made a final decision yet, so please bear with us." So I suspect it's not the next patch. They also were asked about the Type 59. And said Chinese HT's have been buffed, and won't be again.. Tho I can't recall a WZ-111 buff. Chinese mediums are right around the corner. So I suspect that means the T-34-3 to.

 

As for the T95E2? Gun is on pair with just about every tier 8 US 90mm gun. As in "meh", as it's a tier 8 medium after all. That thing needs a turret fix more so then a gun buff.



commer #11 Posted 31 August 2017 - 12:48 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38082 battles
  • 1,995
  • Member since:
    06-14-2011

View PostIgor_BL, on 31 August 2017 - 11:13 AM, said:


Sometimes, you dont need even that one game.
 

 

Mate you realize I didn't quote Shish? I'd never argue with Shish. He has a cat and Lives in Slovenia and that's enough for me to have unrealistic sympathy for him

Swoopie #12 Posted 31 August 2017 - 02:46 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 28368 battles
  • 2,529
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    01-15-2011

View PostKLguns, on 31 August 2017 - 10:49 AM, said:

Yep, its needs a buff: http://wot-record.com/replay/39761/klguns_kv_5_still_stronk

 

7k damage blocked is just not enough for a T8...

 

In other words, you're saying that every tank in the game is fine and balanced because you can find good games from every tank on wotreplays.com for example?

Zodiac1960s #13 Posted 31 August 2017 - 02:54 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 38885 battles
  • 940
  • Member since:
    03-27-2011
Fight the power!

ogremage #14 Posted 31 August 2017 - 03:49 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 33763 battles
  • 1,419
  • [KAZNA] KAZNA
  • Member since:
    06-26-2011
M46 KR also needs a buff.

Radu_Korne #15 Posted 31 August 2017 - 05:40 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 28280 battles
  • 1,420
  • [TFUK] TFUK
  • Member since:
    08-16-2013
and IS3A... actually, a lot of premiums, but who cares really, let's pump out OP premiums so that we can get some sale figures!

Karasu_Hidesuke #16 Posted 31 August 2017 - 06:44 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 16161 battles
  • 3,854
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013

View PostBalc0ra, on 31 August 2017 - 10:36 AM, said:

Well IS-6, KV-5 was said to be next patch a few months ago. Issue is that they still don't know if they are gonna remove the limited MM and give the gun a huge buff and give refunds if people want it. Or keep it and give it a minor buff and keep the limited MM. As WG said 2 days ago "There are a few ideas on how to rebalance the KV-5", and a few days before that "As for the vehicles with preferential matchmaking, we’re working on different solutions on how to tackle this situation, but we haven’t made a final decision yet, so please bear with us." So I suspect it's not the next patch. They also were asked about the Type 59. And said Chinese HT's have been buffed, and won't be again.. Tho I can't recall a WZ-111 buff. Chinese mediums are right around the corner. So I suspect that means the T-34-3 to.

 

As for the T95E2? Gun is on pair with just about every tier 8 US 90mm gun. As in "meh", as it's a tier 8 medium after all. That thing needs a turret fix more so then a gun buff.

 

Seems IS-6 is always to be 'next patch'....

XPuntar #17 Posted 01 September 2017 - 12:10 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14502 battles
  • 1,949
  • Member since:
    08-19-2012

View Postogremage, on 31 August 2017 - 03:49 PM, said:

M46 KR also needs a buff.

 

Eh, it's time for tech tree tanks!

 

BUFF AL THOSE PATHETIC T8 MEDIUM TECH TREE TANKS!  NOW OR RIOT



Wrinkly #18 Posted 01 September 2017 - 12:14 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 45411 battles
  • 264
  • Member since:
    09-05-2012

View PostSir_Bad, on 31 August 2017 - 08:43 AM, said:

Thanks for this totally new idea, that was mentioned never before on these forums. I also find it very nice of you, that every little detail of your proposal/idea was explained in your post.

 

You must be fun at parties.

soul3ater #19 Posted 01 September 2017 - 02:09 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18816 battles
  • 635
  • [OMNIA] OMNIA
  • Member since:
    07-27-2012
Type 59 really needs a buff.

Dammit does it deserve it.

Maauru #20 Posted 01 September 2017 - 06:08 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19245 battles
  • 707
  • [WUUT] WUUT
  • Member since:
    03-29-2014

View PostBalc0ra, on 31 August 2017 - 11:36 AM, said:

Issue is that they still don't know if they are gonna remove the limited MM and give the gun a huge buff and give refunds if people want it. 

 

WG already implemented some clone tanks like IS-6 Black, Panzer 58 Black and others which was same as existing tank but in different colour.

It was pure cash grab but for this situation they could do similar only this time would be legitimate move in benefit of players.

 

They can make for example IS-6 Improved, Special or whatever name which is same as existing IS-6 but with improved gun penetration and removed Preferential MM.

Gun get penetration increased to 221 like on IS-5 or IS-3A but at same time it should have slight reload time increased to be in line with other Russian T6 122m HT.

 

After they implement it they give to all existing IS-6 owners option for 1, 3 or 6 months to trade in their existing tank to new one for free.

If you take preferred MM more important you do not trade in and keep your IS-6 in existing form and if you want improved gun penetration at price of lost preferential MM you trade in.

Same for all old preferential MM tanks with low penetration but preferential MM.

 

That way they don't make tank to powerful with buffing gun but keeping pref MM and no need for refunds for buffing gun but removing pref MM.

 


Edited by Maauru, 01 September 2017 - 06:10 AM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users