Jump to content


Tier 8 China TD. WZ-111 Hull.


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

Search_Warrant #1 Posted 31 August 2017 - 06:28 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 27192 battles
  • 6,158
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011

Why cant we have 112 hull instead of this hull? you know coz 112 tank itself is like preff and stuff so that means its not good enough for normal MM right? so the hull should be perfect for a standard full matchmaker hull right?

Spoiler

 

I mean they are both preff MM hulls right? why choose the trash hull and not the good one? oh heck. why not the NONE preff 110 hull? oh thats right. you chose that crappiest hull of them all, because reasons.


Edited by Search_Warrant, 31 August 2017 - 06:29 PM.


leggasiini #2 Posted 31 August 2017 - 06:31 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 14273 battles
  • 6,194
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

ehhh

 

it has well armor casemate which is only thing you want to expose anyways

 

y does it even matter



tajj7 #3 Posted 31 August 2017 - 06:33 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 25429 battles
  • 13,836
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    03-30-2014
Cos 560 alpha TD that you can't pen frontally with less than 210 pen at tier 8 would be broken.



FluffyRedFox #4 Posted 31 August 2017 - 06:33 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 22971 battles
  • 8,394
  • Member since:
    12-05-2012
Its still better than the premium one :trollface:

leggasiini #5 Posted 31 August 2017 - 06:34 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 14273 battles
  • 6,194
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

View Posttajj7, on 31 August 2017 - 07:33 PM, said:

Cos 560 alpha TD that you can't pen frontally with less than 210 pen at tier 8 would be broken.
 

 

Dont forget 340 HEAT pen lmao



Balc0ra #6 Posted 31 August 2017 - 06:37 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 66296 battles
  • 16,313
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
Considering the other things you have been whining about lately. I'm amazed you would even suggest this. Considering how broken you think the rest at tier 8+ is.

Search_Warrant #7 Posted 31 August 2017 - 06:46 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 27192 battles
  • 6,158
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011

View Posttajj7, on 31 August 2017 - 05:33 PM, said:

Cos 560 alpha TD that you can't pen frontally with less than 210 pen at tier 8 would be broken.
 

 

But WZ-120FT prem tonk with tier10 dpm and 440 alpha is ok? that has 200 LOS without gundep used. with -6 gundep in use its near 240 effective/autobounce.

Edited by Search_Warrant, 31 August 2017 - 06:47 PM.


Search_Warrant #8 Posted 31 August 2017 - 06:48 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 27192 battles
  • 6,158
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011

View PostBalc0ra, on 31 August 2017 - 05:37 PM, said:

Considering the other things you have been whining about lately. I'm amazed you would even suggest this. Considering how broken you think the rest at tier 8+ is.

 

I dont think any of the china TD's are broken or OP. only the tier 8 prem is stupidly broken.

HunterXHunter8 #9 Posted 31 August 2017 - 07:27 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 33424 battles
  • 948
  • Member since:
    04-27-2013

hows the tier 8 chinese prem td broken??

 

i could one clip them in the amx ac 48 



lord_chipmonk #10 Posted 31 August 2017 - 07:57 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 33952 battles
  • 10,251
  • [-HOW-] -HOW-
  • Member since:
    12-23-2012

View PostHunterXHunter8, on 31 August 2017 - 07:27 PM, said:

hows the tier 8 chinese prem td broken??

 

i could one clip them in the amx ac 48 

 

I have no idea if the tank is broken or not, but your logic is terrible. 



Dr_ownape #11 Posted 31 August 2017 - 08:24 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 43467 battles
  • 5,483
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    03-27-2013


Edit: not checked out any of the new TDs yet


Edited by Jbnn, 01 September 2017 - 06:34 AM.


Search_Warrant #12 Posted 31 August 2017 - 08:26 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 27192 battles
  • 6,158
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011

View PostDrownape, on 31 August 2017 - 07:24 PM, said:

 


Edit: not checked out any of the new TDs yet

 

Currently at tier 4 and i really cant stand low tiers.... the hitpoints of the tanks are literally nothing. paper tanks with nothing going for them. its so horrible.

Edited by Jbnn, 01 September 2017 - 06:34 AM.


tajj7 #13 Posted 31 August 2017 - 08:52 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 25429 battles
  • 13,836
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    03-30-2014

View PostSearch_Warrant, on 31 August 2017 - 05:46 PM, said:

 

But WZ-120FT prem tonk with tier10 dpm and 440 alpha is ok? that has 200 LOS without gundep used. with -6 gundep in use its near 240 effective/autobounce.

 

Tier 10 medium DPM maybe, 440 alpha is on tier 8 heavies these days and the premium one has a lfp that tier 5s can pen. 

 

Not it to mention terrible gun handling. So yeh it's fine, wheareas the 112 hull is stupidly strong and you want to basically put it with the Jagdtiger gun. 

 

 



Zodiac1960s #14 Posted 01 September 2017 - 09:04 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 38488 battles
  • 938
  • [VOMIT] VOMIT
  • Member since:
    03-27-2011
Wish the 175 pen guns and preferential mm would disappear from tier eight .
It's just not fun enough compared to other tanks at the same tier imo.

Aikl #15 Posted 01 September 2017 - 09:12 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 25554 battles
  • 4,349
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

View Posttajj7, on 31 August 2017 - 07:52 PM, said:

 

(...)

wheareas the 112 hull is stupidly strong and you want to basically put it with the Jagdtiger gun. 

 

ҬЊДИԞ ЧФЦ ӺФЯ SЏGGЄSҐЇФИ, PДҰЭЯ ҪФԠЯДDЭ, ШЇLL ЪЭ ЇԠPLЭԠЭЙҐ ЇЍ ИԐӼҬ ҒLДVФЯ ФҒ ԠФЙҬЊ PДҬҪҢЇИG ҐЇԠЄ. DДSVЇDДЍЇҰД!

 

(Thank you for suggestion, payer comrade, will be implement in next flavor of month patching time. Dasvidaniya!)

 

You know they're gonna do it, you just know it. :rolleyes:






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users