Jump to content


aimbots


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
32 replies to this topic

dibbo100 #1 Posted 02 September 2017 - 02:18 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 50360 battles
  • 61
  • [SOAF] SOAF
  • Member since:
    04-22-2012
instead of adding more tanks ....sort the aimbots out so many times ammo racked from 450 m....its getting a joke too many auto loaders too just a med rush and the players that carnt even know how to play...everypatch the game gets worse and worse ....get rid of mods and gold ammo and the game will be better for everyone ,,not just the [edited]who spam gold 

Homer_J #2 Posted 02 September 2017 - 02:31 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27652 battles
  • 29,000
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View Postdibbo100, on 02 September 2017 - 02:18 PM, said:

and the players that carnt even know how to play...

 

I think the ones who don't even know what an aimbot can and can't do are a much bigger problem.


Edited by Homer_J, 02 September 2017 - 02:31 PM.


enu_ #3 Posted 02 September 2017 - 02:34 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Beta Tester
  • 22557 battles
  • 3,039
  • [-322-] -322-
  • Member since:
    08-18-2010
send all replays to support, but be sure they are all aimbots. just remember you don't want false accusation, maybe you get punished

Jigabachi #4 Posted 02 September 2017 - 02:48 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17858 battles
  • 18,565
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011
Yay, the weekly aimbot thread. And as always written by someone who dropped out of elementary school.
Nice weekend, folks!

Shivvering #5 Posted 02 September 2017 - 02:57 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 29059 battles
  • 246
  • Member since:
    09-24-2011
Errrmerrrgerd i got ammo racked, must be aimbot!

DarkPacifist #6 Posted 02 September 2017 - 03:01 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 26322 battles
  • 160
  • [CR0WS] CR0WS
  • Member since:
    08-05-2013
Sending replays to support won't solve anything, nobody will look at them (otherwise they would need a lot of people to do so).

Homer_J #7 Posted 02 September 2017 - 03:44 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27652 battles
  • 29,000
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostDarkPacifist, on 02 September 2017 - 03:01 PM, said:

Sending replays to support won't solve anything, nobody will look at them because they are not aimbots

 

 

FTFY



DarkPacifist #8 Posted 02 September 2017 - 03:54 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 26322 battles
  • 160
  • [CR0WS] CR0WS
  • Member since:
    08-05-2013

View PostHomer_J, on 02 September 2017 - 03:44 PM, said:

 

 

FTFY

 

You're right, it's better like that ^^

Mimos_A #9 Posted 02 September 2017 - 04:08 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22246 battles
  • 1,855
  • [QSF-L] QSF-L
  • Member since:
    05-30-2015

View Postdibbo100, on 02 September 2017 - 02:18 PM, said:

instead of adding more tanks ....sort the aimbots out so many times ammo racked from 450 m....its getting a joke too many auto loaders too just a med rush and the players that carnt even know how to play...everypatch the game gets worse and worse ....get rid of mods and gold ammo and the game will be better for everyone ,,not just the [edited]who spam gold 

 

So you actually have proof of an aimbot causing an ammorack or could it just be rng?

 

But hey, I'll put you on my blacklist with all the other cheat whiners that throw around accusations without proof, that way I'll remember to plant you full of premium ammo when I meet you in battle.



japtank #10 Posted 02 September 2017 - 04:10 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27619 battles
  • 1,046
  • Member since:
    04-20-2012

Aimbots don't ammorack from 450m because of the dispersion that only the server has control over.

It is possible for an aimbot to hit some weakspots twice in a row but only at short distance.

 

This being said, aimbots don't really give an edge, their main advantage is to auto-aim even when you don't click right on your target, which allows for very effective snapshots.

I think WG should cut players some slack here and allow a better auto-aim selection, that would probably (maybe?) make aimbots much less attractive and wouldn't take anything away from the game.

Mods doing only that, easier auto-aiming, were legal until very recently though, they decided to ban them and, IMO, it was a bad move.


Edited by japtank, 02 September 2017 - 04:11 PM.


Balc0ra #11 Posted 02 September 2017 - 05:48 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 64443 battles
  • 15,457
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View Postdibbo100, on 02 September 2017 - 02:18 PM, said:

instead of adding more tanks ....sort the aimbots out so many times ammo racked from 450 m....its getting a joke too many auto loaders too just a med rush and the players that carnt even know how to play...everypatch the game gets worse and worse

 

You do know aim bots can only aim for you. They can't send shells dead center each time, and give 100% accuracy on the move like most seems to think. As dispersion is still a thing.  And is no 100% chance to damage your ammo rack, or even blowing it up. As each gun has it's own set of module damage parameters. As your tank has it's own set of module HP. If the first outweighs the second. It will go.... aim bot or not. And if it has a high ROF, it will reset the healing timer on your module, until it goes red or you blow up. That and even if the shot hits your module. It's still only a 27% chance for the shell do even do damage to your modules. So even with aim bots... there is still plenty of RNG that is needed for you to get racked from 450m, regardless of how good their aim is.

 

View Postdibbo100, on 02 September 2017 - 02:18 PM, said:

instead of adding more tanks ....sort the aimbots out so many times ammo racked from 450 m....its getting a joke too many auto loaders too just a med rush and the players that carnt even know how to play...everypatch the game gets worse and worse ....get rid of mods and gold ammo and the game will be better for everyone ,,not just the [edited]who spam gold 

 

Will it now? A few weeks ago we had one like you. That complained about that everyone that hit him used aim bots. As it's 100% impossible for anyone do damage his tracks without it. And 10 out 15 on each team used it etc.  One day we had a micro patch. It only fixed some minor issues, and did not break any mods. He thought they did. And thought it was a mod free day. And came to praise how much more fun the game was when no one had working mods.... when they all did. I suspect if WG said they had patched the game to make mods not work, and you played it. You would think the same, even if every single one used aim mods on you that day.

 

WG should play that Ruse. Maybe the amount of tin foils will go down, if only for a day. As I get a PM from a guy like you once pr match more or less. God forbid you should fire 30 times on the move vs one guy. If one of those 30 hits him and tracks him, and the other 29 lands miles away from him. It's still an aim bot.

 


Edited by Balc0ra, 02 September 2017 - 05:50 PM.


dibbo100 #12 Posted 03 September 2017 - 12:42 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 50360 battles
  • 61
  • [SOAF] SOAF
  • Member since:
    04-22-2012

it just doesnt happen now and agqain all the time first shot track second ammo rack 3rd driver in a t10 from front ...u tell me how u can say *edited* they dont exsist *edited* ...tried to send to wg before ...but as long as they making money they dont give a damm....how is it on the first day of new patch...u dont get all this aimbot crap...a day u can finnaly enjoy wot..then goes down hill from there....*edited*

 


Edited by Daxeno, 04 September 2017 - 12:55 PM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks.


Mimos_A #13 Posted 03 September 2017 - 01:03 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22246 battles
  • 1,855
  • [QSF-L] QSF-L
  • Member since:
    05-30-2015

View Postdibbo100, on 03 September 2017 - 12:42 PM, said:

it just doesnt happen now and agqain all the time first shot track second ammo rack 3rd driver in a t10 from front ...u tell me how u can say *edited* they dont exsist *edited* ...tried to send to wg before ...but as long as they making money they dont give a damm....how is it on the first day of new patch...u dont get all this aimbot crap...a day u can finnaly enjoy wot..then goes down hill from there....*edited*

 

Nobody says they don't exist, but you acting like the town drunk crying about getting your modules damaged by “aimbots" is just as sad as people who cheat. So again, do you have proof of this being caused by an aimbot? And no, getting your modules damaged doesn't prove anything.



HundeWurst #14 Posted 03 September 2017 - 01:27 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 67756 battles
  • 4,281
  • [FAME] FAME
  • Member since:
    02-06-2012
*edited*

Edited by Daxeno, 04 September 2017 - 12:57 PM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to flaming


jabster #15 Posted 03 September 2017 - 01:28 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 12532 battles
  • 22,811
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    12-30-2010

View PostWunderWurst, on 03 September 2017 - 12:27 PM, said:

*edited*

 

Well that's the ambition I'm working towards.

AliceUnchained #16 Posted 03 September 2017 - 01:48 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 38173 battles
  • 8,814
  • [322] 322
  • Member since:
    10-18-2011

View PostHomer_J, on 02 September 2017 - 02:31 PM, said:

 

I think the ones who don't even know what an aimbot can and can't do are a much bigger problem.

 

Wait... are you suggesting the majority of the player base is a problem? Tread lightly...

Jigabachi #17 Posted 03 September 2017 - 01:52 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17858 battles
  • 18,565
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

View Postdibbo100, on 03 September 2017 - 12:42 PM, said:

*edited*

Could you please point me to the posts where people claimed that "cheats" don't exist in this game?

 

Block Quote

...tried to send to wg before

Oh, that's awesome. Can you show us those replays, too?

Upload them to wotreplays.com and link them here with some timestamps and explanations. 



malachi6 #18 Posted 03 September 2017 - 02:42 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 49264 battles
  • 3,238
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011

How do aimbots improve accuracy and guarantee critical hits?  

 

Cheats exist.  Questions are raised as to their utility and use.  some is spelled some.  Google is a proprietary name, try saying search.  Muppets are fun and entertaining.  Unlike this particular tirade.



Dzekas #19 Posted 03 September 2017 - 04:03 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 20221 battles
  • 47
  • Member since:
    12-31-2012

View Postmalachi6, on 03 September 2017 - 02:42 PM, said:

How do aimbots improve accuracy and guarantee critical hits?  

 

 

They can target weak spots, but not at 450 meters.

 

View Postjaptank, on 02 September 2017 - 04:10 PM, said:

This being said, aimbots don't really give an edge, their main advantage is to auto-aim even when you don't click right on your target, which allows for very effective snapshots.

 

Ehm. You forgot that vanilla auto-aim does not lead target. Offsetting aim for moving target is advantage.

 


Edited by Dzekas, 03 September 2017 - 04:06 PM.


NUKLEAR_SLUG #20 Posted 03 September 2017 - 07:17 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27589 battles
  • 1,980
  • Member since:
    06-13-2015

View Postdibbo100, on 03 September 2017 - 12:42 PM, said:

how is it on the first day of new patch...u dont get all this aimbot crap...a day u can finnaly enjoy wot..then goes down hill from there.... *edited*

 

Funny, a while back I remember similar posts being made about how the latest patch had stopped all the aimbots/hacks and how great the game was now. Unfortunately what the poster hadn't realised was the micropatch had not actually broken any of the mods at all. People see aimbots where they want to see aimbots whether they are there or not.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users