Jump to content


I don't care if I get banned from forum for this


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
20 replies to this topic

Tang78 #1 Posted 04 September 2017 - 07:23 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 12098 battles
  • 36
  • Member since:
    03-04-2011

Damn WG, what have you people done. This game is horrible and at tier 8 unplayable due to your incompetence lately.

 

*What happened to be top tier when you have lost a few matches is it set to 10% that will occur or what?

*+-2 tier difference is almost unplayable unless hitting the 2 key, but even then some gun can't get enough of pen due to imbalance buffing. Is it to much to change it +- 1 instead.

*Copy and paste of Primo Victoria from Centurion I and reskinned it to a premium tank (those who bought that tank, SUCKER!!!). You earn no money, you will face tier 10 90% of the time and those gun penetrate you like butter anyway at that tier.

*One word, "Arty".

*Playing in platoon. Those matchmaking is even worse.

 

There is lots more issue, but if you start to look at your own forums then you will know the frustration or start play 10000 games instead of rolling in your money.



Jigabachi #2 Posted 04 September 2017 - 07:29 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17923 battles
  • 19,023
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011
Why should you get banned for starting a whinethread? Especially when you can almost call some of it a tiny bit borderline constructive...

Edited by Jigabachi, 04 September 2017 - 07:30 PM.


Tang78 #3 Posted 04 September 2017 - 07:36 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 12098 battles
  • 36
  • Member since:
    03-04-2011

View PostJigabachi, on 04 September 2017 - 07:29 PM, said:

Why should you get banned for starting a whinethread? Especially when you can almost call some of it a tiny bit borderline constructive...

 

You never know, I called them incompetent.

Balc0ra #4 Posted 04 September 2017 - 07:47 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 66269 battles
  • 16,257
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View PostTang78, on 04 September 2017 - 07:23 PM, said:

*What happened to be top tier when you have lost a few matches is it set to 10% that will occur or what?

 

They never said it would help you win more, when you had a losing streak. It was for when you got bottom tier to often. If the MM allows it. It never had anything to with you losing or not. Don't matter if you win or lose all your +2 games. If you get 6 to 8 of them in a row. MM will try to get you more mid to top tier games. Key word here is "try" and "allows".

 

View PostTang78, on 04 September 2017 - 07:23 PM, said:

*+-2 tier difference is almost unplayable unless hitting the 2 key, but even then some gun can't get enough of pen due to imbalance buffing. Is it to much to change it +- 1 instead.

 

I'm one of the wired people that miss the days when my Luchs did face Tiger II's. And most of my best games in some of my fav tanks are in +2 games. I find the equal tier games fun now and then. But it gets boring fast when you get them constantly on tier 8 limited MM tanks. And +1 all day for me would be boring to. Sure some tanks are not ideal for +2. I can agree with that. But overall... +2 MM is one of the many reason why I am still here. Some like it, others don't. Just the way it is. And it's not as bad as before. As then you could get 8 +2 targets. 3 is workable. I mean it's 3 more then a +1. No one says you have to seek out their top 3 out 15 targets instantly do they?

 

View PostTang78, on 04 September 2017 - 07:23 PM, said:

*Copy and paste of Primo Victoria from Centurion I and reskinned it to a premium tank (those who bought that tank, SUCKER!!!). You earn no money, you will face tier 10 90% of the time and those gun penetrate you like butter anyway at that tier.

 

But the Patriot you bought that is more or less a copy paste with more armor is fine? Swedes actually had this tank in service. So why not?  And how do you know if it makes money or not if you don't own it? Then again, it's not the tier X's he should fear in that tank. There are more tier 8 targets with more armor then he has pen he needs to worry about. Like your Patriot.

 

View PostTang78, on 04 September 2017 - 07:23 PM, said:

*One word, "Arty".

 

Well it's there. Nothing we ca do about it. Because as of now. It won't be removed by the looks of it. Then again, most that do complain about it don't know what they fear. As I see way to many just sit there in the same spot and let arty bully them down while having a staring contest vs a HT around the corner, spotting him. And sadly, most are afraid of both, but ignore both. You have arty to. And more so then not, people allow enemy arty to bully them, vs allowing their arty to help.

 

View PostTang78, on 04 September 2017 - 07:23 PM, said:

 

There is lots more issue, but if you start to look at your own forums then you will know the frustration or start play 10000 games instead of rolling in your money.

 

You bought 2 of the tier 8 premiums that have caused a few issues in the long run that is one of the many issues of late. And since most are like you and whine, constantly complains, hates the game, hates MM, hates RNG, hates arty, but still plays the game and buys the broken tier 8 premiums. You think WG will notice the bigger issue? Or think everything is fine since you are spending money still?

 

Derethim #5 Posted 04 September 2017 - 08:07 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 17518 battles
  • 1,888
  • Member since:
    04-03-2012

Artillery is fine, until it one-shots heavy tanks. Then it becomes a problem.

It should be able to two or even one-shot paper TDs, but not a heavy, not even when it hits the engine.

 

For me, playing +2 tiers usually means challenge - take it as a challenge and it will be a lot less painful. Also, support your teammates. You don't have to be able carry every game to be significant in it.

+2 Should make you load gold, if you want to pen a Tier 10 HT in your Tier 8 HT, for example, but I agree on one big thing, that is becoming a problem.

 

They are buffing the armor on T7+ around premium ammo - which is utter bullcrap.


Edited by Derethim, 04 September 2017 - 08:08 PM.


Spurtung #6 Posted 04 September 2017 - 08:18 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 63655 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostTang78, on 04 September 2017 - 08:23 PM, said:

*Copy and paste of Primo Victoria from Centurion I and reskinned it to a premium tank (those who bought that tank, SUCKER!!!). You earn no money, you will face tier 10 90% of the time and those gun penetrate you like butter anyway at that tier.

I'm here wondering wtf do you have to do with it and why would you call anyone sucker for getting something they want.



Sfinski #7 Posted 04 September 2017 - 08:52 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 31704 battles
  • 2,615
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013

View PostJigabachi, on 04 September 2017 - 09:49 PM, said:

If I remember correctly, that was NOT the reason for closing the thread. Calling it "rude" was just a simple statement.

 

So asking for them to fix the MM and blaming their incompetence isn't the reason? Wasn't anything else on that thread. 

Erwin_Von_Braun #8 Posted 04 September 2017 - 08:58 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 38254 battles
  • 4,952
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-25-2014
YAWN:sceptic:

wsatnutter #9 Posted 04 September 2017 - 09:11 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Beta Tester
  • 24957 battles
  • 7,582
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    08-25-2010
Op you have a point to some degree

G01ngToxicCommand0 #10 Posted 04 September 2017 - 09:13 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 37465 battles
  • 727
  • Member since:
    11-03-2011

View PostTang78, on 04 September 2017 - 07:23 PM, said:

Damn WG, what have you people done. This game is horrible and at tier 8 unplayable due to your incompetence lately.

 

*What happened to be top tier when you have lost a few matches is it set to 10% that will occur or what?

*+-2 tier difference is almost unplayable unless hitting the 2 key, but even then some gun can't get enough of pen due to imbalance buffing. Is it to much to change it +- 1 instead.

*Copy and paste of Primo Victoria from Centurion I and reskinned it to a premium tank (those who bought that tank, SUCKER!!!). You earn no money, you will face tier 10 90% of the time and those gun penetrate you like butter anyway at that tier.

*One word, "Arty".

*Playing in platoon. Those matchmaking is even worse.

 

There is lots more issue, but if you start to look at your own forums then you will know the frustration or start play 10000 games instead of rolling in your money.

 

Nor should you, the forum is not read by the game developers so anything written here is nothing but waste of time and resources so being banned has no real impact or effect other than it was probably fun writing something that results in the ban:trollface:

BP_OMowe #11 Posted 04 September 2017 - 09:55 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 24764 battles
  • 2,047
  • [-GY-] -GY-
  • Member since:
    01-08-2013

View PostBalc0ra, on 04 September 2017 - 07:47 PM, said:

View PostTang78, on 04 September 2017 - 07:23 PM, said:

*Copy and paste of Primo Victoria from Centurion I and reskinned it to a premium tank (those who bought that tank, SUCKER!!!). You earn no money, you will face tier 10 90% of the time and those gun penetrate you like butter anyway at that tier.

 

But the Patriot you bought that is more or less a copy paste with more armor is fine? Swedes actually had this tank in service. So why not?  And how do you know if it makes money or not if you don't own it? Then again, it's not the tier X's he should fear in that tank. There are more tier 8 targets with more armor then he has pen he needs to worry about. Like your Patriot.

 

Centurion mk. I never served in the Swedish Army, which had the mk III and mk V under the designation stridsvagn 81.

Jigabachi #12 Posted 04 September 2017 - 10:16 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17923 battles
  • 19,023
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

View PostSfinski, on 04 September 2017 - 08:52 PM, said:

So asking for them to fix the MM and blaming their incompetence isn't the reason? Wasn't anything else on that thread. 

No idea. I just remember the mod clarifying that with the last post.



Kartoshkaya #13 Posted 04 September 2017 - 11:59 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 23531 battles
  • 335
  • [5FPS] 5FPS
  • Member since:
    01-01-2015

You have to try harder, I swear in half of my posts and they don't want to ban me.

 

As for the topic, I pretty much 100% agree.

 

MM is at its worst state. I thought grand battles and tier X bond grinding would had rebalanced tier VIII but the difference is barely noticeable wich make sense because players needs creds to play tier X and they'll farm them with tier VIII premiums tanks... (Because of gold ammo wich you mentionned).


Edited by Kartoshkaya, 05 September 2017 - 12:00 AM.


jabster #14 Posted 05 September 2017 - 05:38 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 12537 battles
  • 23,390
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    12-30-2010

View PostSfinski, on 04 September 2017 - 07:52 PM, said:

 

So asking for them to fix the MM and blaming their incompetence isn't the reason? Wasn't anything else on that thread. 

 

Your thread was closed as it was to do with the MM and for that you're supposed to used the pinned MM thread. It was also pointed out that it wasn't a good idea to call WG incompetent nutjobs. Have you actually read the forum rules or do you just think they shouldn't apply to you?



Pandabird #15 Posted 05 September 2017 - 06:40 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 33973 battles
  • 4,526
  • [KOFF] KOFF
  • Member since:
    05-19-2013
Stop playing then lol

Spurtung #16 Posted 05 September 2017 - 07:01 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 63655 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostSfinski, on 04 September 2017 - 09:52 PM, said:

View PostJigabachi, on 04 September 2017 - 09:49 PM, said:

If I remember correctly, that was NOT the reason for closing the thread. Calling it "rude" was just a simple statement.

 

So asking for them to fix the MM and blaming their incompetence isn't the reason? Wasn't anything else on that thread. 

No, it wasn't. The reason, and it's clearly stated there, was the existence of a pinned MM thread that should have been used instead of creating a new thread, like you did.

Name calling was simply mentioned as being rude, not the reason to lock it.



ZlatanArKung #17 Posted 05 September 2017 - 07:24 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 5,112
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014
Yes, this new MM is horrible for anything except T9.

But according to WG it is almost perfect, so time to stop playing I guess...

Sfinski #18 Posted 05 September 2017 - 08:29 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 31704 battles
  • 2,615
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013

View PostSpurtung, on 05 September 2017 - 08:01 AM, said:

No, it wasn't. The reason, and it's clearly stated there, was the existence of a pinned MM thread that should have been used instead of creating a new thread, like you did.

Name calling was simply mentioned as being rude, not the reason to lock it.

Fine. 

 

But it still stands  WG being incompetent isn't name calling. Just their level of managing the game. 

 

Pinned threads are also a way to hide all the important issues. Makes it look like less people are complain about MM and arty when the whole page is not filled with threads about them. Yet, nothing proper is done to either of them so threads will keep popping up and closed. 



Spurtung #19 Posted 05 September 2017 - 08:35 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 63655 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostSfinski, on 05 September 2017 - 09:29 AM, said:

But it still stands  WG being incompetent isn't name calling. Just their level of managing the game.

That wasn't just that, it was also nutbags.

 

Either way, something being true doesn't make it less name calling. Like calling someone ginger, or mongoloid.



DracheimFlug #20 Posted 05 September 2017 - 08:43 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 8957 battles
  • 4,033
  • Member since:
    11-13-2014

View PostBP_OMowe, on 04 September 2017 - 09:55 PM, said:

 

Centurion mk. I never served in the Swedish Army, which had the mk III and mk V under the designation stridsvagn 81.

 

The Stock Cent I in game is the Centurion I. The turret upgrade + 20 pdr = Mk III. Hence the turret upgrade being the "Mk III turret"




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users