Jump to content


T69 is tier 1!


  • Please log in to reply
48 replies to this topic

hasnainrakha57 #1 Posted 06 September 2017 - 11:49 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12644 battles
  • 468
  • [WFTTE] WFTTE
  • Member since:
    08-01-2013
T69 sucks its armor is worst,gun dispersion is worst,aim time is worst and speed is worst long relode time i fire 4 shot 3 miss and 1 did not penetrated i am not a gold spammer it needs buff!.IT has no positive point!

Edited by hasnainrakha57, 06 September 2017 - 11:53 AM.


DuncaN_101 #2 Posted 06 September 2017 - 11:51 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 51862 battles
  • 1,502
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011
Just lol

Spurtung #3 Posted 06 September 2017 - 11:54 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 60179 battles
  • 5,532
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostDuncaN_101, on 06 September 2017 - 12:51 PM, said:

Just lol

There's more to lol about, he's on a mission.

http://forum.worldoftanks.eu/index.php?/topic/642962-112-needs-penetration-buff/

Kozzy #4 Posted 06 September 2017 - 11:54 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 38543 battles
  • 2,328
  • [EAB2] EAB2
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011

The tank never feels very strong, especially with the current MM, but I do actually love playing it and do great in it (one of my best performing tanks).  You need to make sure you are always with team mates, never push alone or lead the attack.  The burst damage is great and the gold ammo is usable but, as you say, the armour is not reliable.

 

Maybe post up some replays so people on the forums can give advice on how you can improve in it?



Aikl #5 Posted 06 September 2017 - 11:55 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 25141 battles
  • 4,049
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011
Are you going to make a new thread for every tank you don't like?

hasnainrakha57 #6 Posted 06 September 2017 - 11:59 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12644 battles
  • 468
  • [WFTTE] WFTTE
  • Member since:
    08-01-2013
Its not thread i cant even pen is3 front and so many bounce on that crap cdc cant even pen lower plate of t32.Meds have average penetration of 201. Just look lorr.

shane73tank #7 Posted 06 September 2017 - 12:41 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26350 battles
  • 1,927
  • [USAGI] USAGI
  • Member since:
    03-01-2014

it is sad but true that this tank has many faults one of which is if you do not wait for the recticle to reduce when unloading the clip you will miss/bounce - however in those games where you play it well and the stars align it's very very rewarding. 

 

As others have said, never go alone with this tank, it's probably most fun in a Toon where your teammate can protect you during reload and draw a shot from the enemy for you to pop out and unload that clip. 

 

Lorr 40t is a premium that has above average pen, also you are driving a med,  why are you even firing at the front of an IS3 ?  Was it head on - even better then for the IS3 with the Pike nose !  

 

I'm not trying to wind you up, this tank more than any other needs a lot of games and even more patience.



MrClark56 #8 Posted 06 September 2017 - 12:41 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 5693 battles
  • 2,316
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-17-2013

you try to pen Is3 from the front and come moan that you bounce in it? lol.. indeed the T69 needs a buff... but it is bums like you who come whine on here while not knowing how to play the tank properly that don't make the case for buffing the tank. you wouldn't even know what to buff...

 

Fact : T69 needs a BUff

Fact : You need a buff too...



hasnainrakha57 #9 Posted 06 September 2017 - 12:42 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12644 battles
  • 468
  • [WFTTE] WFTTE
  • Member since:
    08-01-2013
U want me to go to its side like it has 80 speed and is3 has traverse speed of 1? I am saying head on just think of this tank on hill in himels.... Map where u face is3.

Edited by hasnainrakha57, 06 September 2017 - 12:44 PM.


Spurtung #10 Posted 06 September 2017 - 12:48 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 60179 battles
  • 5,532
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View Posthasnainrakha57, on 06 September 2017 - 01:42 PM, said:

U want me to go to its side like it has 80 speed and is3 has traverse speed of 1? I am saying head on just think of this tank on hill in himels.... Map where u face is3.

 

Just out of curiosity, would you drive an IS3 up the hill on himmels?

alienslive #11 Posted 06 September 2017 - 12:51 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 82923 battles
  • 1,793
  • [MEME] MEME
  • Member since:
    09-20-2013
I agree the tank is a bit outdated. Especially against tier 10s in the new mm.

DracheimFlug #12 Posted 06 September 2017 - 12:57 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 8933 battles
  • 3,734
  • Member since:
    11-13-2014

View PostSpurtung, on 06 September 2017 - 12:48 PM, said:

 

Just out of curiosity, would you drive an IS3 up the hill on himmels?

 

Just out of curiosity, would you take your T69 to the hill in Himmels in the hopes of finding somewhere that you could easily flank an IS3?

Balc0ra #13 Posted 06 September 2017 - 01:01 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 62857 battles
  • 14,464
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
Unless you play it like a HT and is brawling with everything. I don't see the issue. Sure the pen is "meh" and could use a 2nd buff. But it was far worse before. At least it's on pair with all the US 90mm guns now on tier 8, vs far behind it. And sure it can't win a 1 on 1, just like the Lorr 40t. But in the right role, it's a fairly capable tank at times. And not 100% useless... like most tier 8 med are.

shane73tank #14 Posted 06 September 2017 - 01:03 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26350 battles
  • 1,927
  • [USAGI] USAGI
  • Member since:
    03-01-2014

View PostDracheimFlug, on 06 September 2017 - 11:57 AM, said:

 

Just out of curiosity, would you take your T69 to the hill in Himmels in the hopes of finding somewhere that you could easily flank an IS3?

 

actually depending on the MM it would not be a bad tactic to follow  some other heavies to there and be ready to pop out and unload once the enemy has fired at one of your allies, also if you spawned from the south then on the hill in the dip along the ridge you could get hulldown  and you might get the juicy lower hull of other tanks that need to expose themselves because of their gun depression from the north side.

hasnainrakha57 #15 Posted 06 September 2017 - 01:06 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12644 battles
  • 468
  • [WFTTE] WFTTE
  • Member since:
    08-01-2013
U guys dont understand this thing has no positive point just think of other mediums they have average of 201 penetration except the russian t44s which are now better due to turret armor buff t69 has no armor,no penetration use your sense 181 mm against tier 8,9 and 10. And i dont spam gold aim time is 2.7 accuracy 0.38.U say flank,flank is not that ezy u idiots if i flank that tank will surely move his hull towards me.

hasnainrakha57 #16 Posted 06 September 2017 - 01:09 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12644 battles
  • 468
  • [WFTTE] WFTTE
  • Member since:
    08-01-2013
And rarely u see 5 times this tank out of 100 matches coz players dont give crapabout this tank they just skip it search this tank on youtube only less videos will appear about it compared to other tanks.

Hyster #17 Posted 06 September 2017 - 01:11 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 27434 battles
  • 578
  • [T-S_K] T-S_K
  • Member since:
    02-14-2012

10k games and u have not worked out that the IS-3 has awesome frontal armour ????

meds do NOT take on heavys frontally, meds u use to flank and shoot in the sides or rear, the T-69 being a auto loader is great for that.

 

the problem ?? YOU do not understand how to play the tank



Spurtung #18 Posted 06 September 2017 - 01:16 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 60179 battles
  • 5,532
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostDracheimFlug, on 06 September 2017 - 01:57 PM, said:

 

Just out of curiosity, would you take your T69 to the hill in Himmels in the hopes of finding somewhere that you could easily flank an IS3?

 

My question wasn't about or even related to T69. Just curious, really, as an IS3 up there will hardly do a good job against semi-competent same tier adversaries.

 

But if you're including the T69 back in, and depending on the team setups, yes, I would very much consider taking a T69 up there.


Edited by Spurtung, 06 September 2017 - 01:17 PM.


hasnainrakha57 #19 Posted 06 September 2017 - 01:18 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12644 battles
  • 468
  • [WFTTE] WFTTE
  • Member since:
    08-01-2013
Is 3 has 191 in front sides so the armor is not good and tds camp a lot so flank is not ezy and players dont fight alone so how i flank theres always other player around ...and yesterday there was a t32 alone it angled its lower plate bit only i unload my 2 shells into it and i did no dmg thats a gg and the acceleration is slugish on t69.

Edited by hasnainrakha57, 06 September 2017 - 01:22 PM.


cmgamesro #20 Posted 06 September 2017 - 01:20 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 11204 battles
  • 539
  • [DS-RO] DS-RO
  • Member since:
    11-16-2015
actually, it may be a threat for tier 2 too.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users