Jump to content


Kinda, sorta decent padding.


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

cro001 #1 Posted 11 September 2017 - 03:22 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27842 battles
  • 1,888
  • Member since:
    10-21-2012

I know there are amazing players out there, but for me, this is amazing DPG. Albeit crapWR because reasons, probably me being not unicum material.

 



eldrak #2 Posted 11 September 2017 - 03:31 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 45799 battles
  • 975
  • [NE-VO] NE-VO
  • Member since:
    01-27-2011

0/184= -1

Some stronk math right there.



ZlatanArKung #3 Posted 11 September 2017 - 04:40 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 5,112
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View Posteldrak, on 11 September 2017 - 03:31 PM, said:

0/184= -1

Some stronk math right there.

WG math....



_EXODUZ_ #4 Posted 11 September 2017 - 04:43 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 34159 battles
  • 1,935
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    11-05-2014
E50 is bae. E50 is life. <3

thestaggy #5 Posted 12 September 2017 - 07:24 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14674 battles
  • 1,888
  • Member since:
    04-24-2015

56% win rate is crap?



somegras #6 Posted 12 September 2017 - 08:50 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 45986 battles
  • 8,661
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    09-04-2013

View Postthestaggy, on 12 September 2017 - 07:24 AM, said:

56% win rate is crap?

 

For 3k avg on tier 9? Yes, that's pretty terrible.



cro001 #7 Posted 12 September 2017 - 09:19 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27842 battles
  • 1,888
  • Member since:
    10-21-2012

View Postthestaggy, on 12 September 2017 - 07:24 AM, said:

56% win rate is crap?

 

Should be at least 62% or higher easy. E-50 carries hard, it just doesn't carry me. :D

 



Jigabachi #8 Posted 12 September 2017 - 11:31 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17698 battles
  • 17,592
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

View Postsomegras, on 12 September 2017 - 08:50 AM, said:

For 3k avg on tier 9? Yes, that's pretty terrible.

Maybe there is a connection.

Maybe it's the same connection we draw when talking about bad players with high average damage and low WR...

 

*slowly backs out of the thread*



somegras #9 Posted 12 September 2017 - 12:02 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 45986 battles
  • 8,661
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    09-04-2013

View PostJigabachi, on 12 September 2017 - 11:31 AM, said:

Maybe there is a connection.

Maybe it's the same connection we draw when talking about bad players with high average damage and low WR...

 

*slowly backs out of the thread*

 

Just on a quick glance his survival rate is just pretty low, which leads to lower carry potential in late game situations.



cro001 #10 Posted 13 September 2017 - 02:42 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27842 battles
  • 1,888
  • Member since:
    10-21-2012

View Postsomegras, on 12 September 2017 - 12:02 PM, said:

Just on a quick glance his survival rate is just pretty low, which leads to lower carry potential in late game situations.

 

I can safely say a lot of games were lost because I yoled because I thought game is over. It wasn't. And we lost. :D

brumbarr #11 Posted 13 September 2017 - 02:48 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,283
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

nice, my first  T9 tank over 3K dpg was the amx30, now working on the magical 4K barrier at tier10.

 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users