Jump to content


Forum mods don't go on powertrips...


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
17 replies to this topic

anonym_kL7qtn3e52MB #1 Posted 12 September 2017 - 08:38 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 0 battles
  • 6,815
  • Member since:
    07-10-2018

*edited*

 

Block Quote

 

Do not discuss moderation and sanctions

  • Read our Forum Rules to understand why your post was moderated

 

Block Quote

 Be constructive

 

  • If the only purpose of your post is to be negative, it is not worth posting.

 

Block Quote

 

Do not create topics/posts to share private conversations

  • Exchanges with our Customer Support Services and through private messages should remain private

 

 


Edited by Jahrakajin, 12 September 2017 - 09:45 AM.
Edited because numerous Rule violation


Spurtung #2 Posted 12 September 2017 - 08:41 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 61592 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

Serves you just right for reporting people for petty reasons.

 

Oh, and please, keep discussing mods and their conduct, don't report them or contact their superior, oh no, just do the laundry where we can all see it.



anonym_kL7qtn3e52MB #3 Posted 12 September 2017 - 08:43 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 0 battles
  • 6,815
  • Member since:
    07-10-2018

View PostSpurtung, on 12 September 2017 - 08:41 AM, said:

Serves you just right for reporting people for petty reasons.

 

Oh, and please, keep discussing mods and their conduct, don't report them or contact their superior, oh no, just do the laundry where we can all see it.

 

WG doesn't need to be rescued by apology poasters...

shishx_the_animal #4 Posted 12 September 2017 - 08:45 AM

    Colonel

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 30730 battles
  • 3,861
  • [FAIME] FAIME
  • Member since:
    04-06-2013

View PostSpek_en_Bonen, on 12 September 2017 - 07:43 AM, said:

 

WG doesn't need to be rescued by apology poasters...

 

I hope you won't wonder why you got banned for the second time...

Spurtung #5 Posted 12 September 2017 - 08:47 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 61592 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostSpek_en_Bonen, on 12 September 2017 - 09:43 AM, said:

 

WG doesn't need to be rescued by apology poasters...

 

Neither do you. I, for once, sure enjoyed those 2 weeks without your whining presence. Sadly, you came back with more of the same.

qpranger #6 Posted 12 September 2017 - 08:52 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 31516 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013

Release Roger!!!

#inb4lock



jabster #7 Posted 12 September 2017 - 09:02 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 12532 battles
  • 22,811
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    12-30-2010

View Postshishx_the_animal, on 12 September 2017 - 07:45 AM, said:

 

I hope you won't wonder why you got banned for the second time...

 

Unfortunately I expect they will.



FluffyRedFox #8 Posted 12 September 2017 - 09:11 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 22619 battles
  • 8,109
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    12-05-2012
inb4 the lock

pallie_the_artillerist #9 Posted 12 September 2017 - 09:25 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 17396 battles
  • 1,171
  • [S3AL] S3AL
  • Member since:
    01-12-2013
here i thought discussing moderation on forums was illegal

shishx_the_animal #10 Posted 12 September 2017 - 09:27 AM

    Colonel

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 30730 battles
  • 3,861
  • [FAIME] FAIME
  • Member since:
    04-06-2013

View Postpallie_the_artillerist, on 12 September 2017 - 08:25 AM, said:

here i thought discussing moderation on forums was illegal

 

It's sanctioned but this is is spek_en_bonen we're talking about...

Shivvering #11 Posted 12 September 2017 - 09:29 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 29055 battles
  • 246
  • Member since:
    09-24-2011
Not sure what this post hopes to gain. Unless you are collecting bans?

arthurwellsley #12 Posted 12 September 2017 - 09:32 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 51268 battles
  • 2,814
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    05-11-2011

View Postshishx_the_animal, on 12 September 2017 - 07:45 AM, said:

 

I hope you won't wonder why you got banned for the second time...

 

Oh dear I find myself agreeing with shisx_the_animal.

jabster #13 Posted 12 September 2017 - 09:32 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 12532 battles
  • 22,811
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    12-30-2010

View PostShivvering, on 12 September 2017 - 08:29 AM, said:

Not sure what this post hopes to gain. Unless you are collecting bans?

 

Well that's what I'm hoping.



Aikl #14 Posted 12 September 2017 - 09:33 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 25167 battles
  • 4,253
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

Constructive feedback isn't banned; but I'd expect any threads suggesting that <insert moderator here> would fit well in a role as <insert military rank here> of <insert despotic regime here> (or something to that extent). Last time it got closed because the very premise of the thread was flawed. Proper feedback would probably be fine, though it might be hard with the 'naming and shaming' policy (if that extends to moderator posts).

 

That being said, I find it somewhat questionable what kind of language is tolerated in general. I mean, apparently it's in bad taste to suggest that this guy could play tanks well if RNG wanted him to (the OP in the thread in question was literally asking why he did so well despite him being a below-average player; and the truth is that he played rather well and had a fair bit of luck - half of that is fully achievable by a handicapped primate).

 

Seeing as I'm apparently offensive even if I don't even intend to be, I instead focus on quantity over quality. Spam is not illegal, and spam can be funny too. :)



jack_timber #15 Posted 12 September 2017 - 09:36 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 32474 battles
  • 1,893
  • Member since:
    07-26-2014

View Postpallie_the_artillerist, on 12 September 2017 - 08:25 AM, said:

here i thought discussing moderation on forums was illegal

 

Well as long as it's constructive and doesn't name and shame don't see the problem.

TBH I reckon moderators do a grand job it can't be easy trying to ballance the posts within the bounds of common decency. Mind u there's always one or two......



Spurtung #16 Posted 12 September 2017 - 09:40 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 61592 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View Postjabster, on 12 September 2017 - 10:32 AM, said:

View PostShivvering, on 12 September 2017 - 08:29 AM, said:

Not sure what this post hopes to gain. Unless you are collecting bans?

 

Well that's what I'm hoping.

I second this. Next warning grants 1 year off, right?



ZlatanArKung #17 Posted 12 September 2017 - 09:43 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 5,112
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014
This OP is like bashing in open doors...

Jahrakajin #18 Posted 12 September 2017 - 09:51 AM

  • Guest
Spek, I think I tried to be understanding when you messaged me about your concerns on moderation and how we handle the Forum. I believe I've been very open minded on feedback and I'd think that everyone has a place in this Forum for discussing World of Tanks. However, as said numerous times, it has to be within the boundaries of the Forum rules. This thread and your post have been edited because of the quoted reasons in your initial post (which I took the liberty to edit).

I do not enjoy banning people from the Forum, especially since the 3 strike system can result in a long absence of posting here but please note that this is your final warning

As always you can contact me or anyone else if you have questions but after pointing out why and how things have happened and how we could fix them if mistakes have been made this Thread shows me you have very little intentions to actually resolve anything but rather chose to go on a rant again.

Threads closed.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users