Jump to content


Fix the god damn JP-E-100


  • Please log in to reply
199 replies to this topic

Zodiac1960s #1 Posted 15 September 2017 - 07:33 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 38468 battles
  • 938
  • [VOMIT] VOMIT
  • Member since:
    03-27-2011

It's obviously broken some way or another.  2/3 fully aimed shots don't even hit the target and those that do hit bounce, 299-400 pen is bouncing on 100-250 armor..

 

Im doing to missions for the 55a and I'm trying the last mission with different tanks. This is by far the worst rng bs tank in the game. Never seen anything close to it. 

Not my opinion,  but a fact.  I clearly see it when I compare results. 

 

Do something!



Lentomies1 #2 Posted 15 September 2017 - 07:45 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 28686 battles
  • 321
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    12-05-2012

View PostBlind_Hate, on 15 September 2017 - 09:33 AM, said:

It's obviously broken some way or another.  2/3 fully aimed shots don't even hit the target and those that do hit bounce, 299-400 pen is bouncing on 100-250 armor..

 

Im doing to missions for the 55a and I'm trying the last mission with different tanks. This is by far the worst rng bs tank in the game. Never seen anything close to it. 

Not my opinion,  but a fact.  I clearly see it when I compare results. 

 

Do something!

 

​Thats weird. It's accuracy is rather good (0.35) so I believe it can't be that bad. My Foch 155 has worse soft stats and it pens/hits nearly every shell.

I think you are just getting unlucky. Don't play it for a while and try again later. If playing it makes you frustrated​, just don't play it. Instead, play something with good accuracy/gun handling.



Zodiac1960s #3 Posted 15 September 2017 - 07:55 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 38468 battles
  • 938
  • [VOMIT] VOMIT
  • Member since:
    03-27-2011
The stats are just fine. It's something else that's not working correctly.  I have platooned with people and they can confirm it.  Both by playing it themselves and covering me with arty.

I would not make this thread if I did not know how or where to aim, or how to use the various ammo types.  

As I said before,  compared to the other 15+ tds I have this is on its own level.  

the_Haba #4 Posted 15 September 2017 - 08:04 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 26329 battles
  • 255
  • Member since:
    12-13-2013
It is a trash tank. With all the downsides it has, every should be an autopen at least. But nah, you expose yourself, spend an eternity aiming only to bounce a batchat and then get penned by tier 8s. Because armour matters.

ZlatanArKung #5 Posted 15 September 2017 - 08:10 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 5,112
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014
I think it has to high alpha to be a good addition to gameplay, thus, it should get reworked.

gunslingerXXX #6 Posted 15 September 2017 - 08:11 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 11034 battles
  • 1,998
  • [GUNSL] GUNSL
  • Member since:
    11-16-2014
Buy fort knox.

Kurat666 #7 Posted 15 September 2017 - 08:11 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 29534 battles
  • 285
  • [WEBAN] WEBAN
  • Member since:
    12-27-2011

I agree that its  299-400 pen works only on paper. This gun feels the same like the gun on T34-3. Its too unreliable and RNG dependant. And even AMX 13-90 and BC tracks provide enough protection from its AP round to recieve no damage



Kozzy #8 Posted 15 September 2017 - 08:17 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 38855 battles
  • 2,705
  • [EAB2] EAB2
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011

View PostBlind_Hate, on 15 September 2017 - 06:33 AM, said:

It's obviously broken some way or another.  2/3 fully aimed shots don't even hit the target and those that do hit bounce, 299-400 pen is bouncing on 100-250 armor..

 

Im doing to missions for the 55a and I'm trying the last mission with different tanks. This is by far the worst rng bs tank in the game. Never seen anything close to it. 

Not my opinion,  but a fact.  I clearly see it when I compare results. 

 

Do something!

 

I guess you are not willing to show the replay of this miraculous bounce?  Funnily enough I got a 7k damage game in mine 2 days ago and have averaged 5k over my last 3 games.  Feels pretty strong to me still.

Edited by Kozzy, 15 September 2017 - 08:18 AM.


HaZardeur #9 Posted 15 September 2017 - 08:24 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 33402 battles
  • 1,182
  • Member since:
    08-14-2010

View PostKurat666, on 15 September 2017 - 08:11 AM, said:

I agree that its  299-400 pen works only on paper. This gun feels the same like the gun on T34-3. Its too unreliable and RNG dependant. And even AMX 13-90 and BC tracks provide enough protection from its AP round to recieve no damage

 

Thats the most annoying thing... sling a shell big as a car towards a light tank and hit them for crit no damage, apart from that I cant complain.

Edited by HaZardeur, 15 September 2017 - 08:25 AM.


Zodiac1960s #10 Posted 15 September 2017 - 08:31 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 38468 battles
  • 938
  • [VOMIT] VOMIT
  • Member since:
    03-27-2011
Just had a Leopard bouncing my shot into the front of the hull..

HunterXHunter8 #11 Posted 15 September 2017 - 08:44 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 33424 battles
  • 948
  • Member since:
    04-27-2013

it's a crappy tank but it doesn't disappoint you and only impresses you. 17cm gun has a lot of ghost shells, bad despersion is also a problem. 

 

 

e3 disappoints you harder since it's so good on paper 



Yaccay #12 Posted 15 September 2017 - 08:47 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 32786 battles
  • 1,992
  • [4TL] 4TL
  • Member since:
    11-21-2012

JPZ E100 is very trollish....

 



Kozzy #13 Posted 15 September 2017 - 09:05 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 38855 battles
  • 2,705
  • [EAB2] EAB2
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011

View PostBlind_Hate, on 15 September 2017 - 07:31 AM, said:

Just had a Leopard bouncing my shot into the front of the hull..

 

Show us the replay?

AtomkickShinoski #14 Posted 15 September 2017 - 09:33 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 6576 battles
  • 68
  • Member since:
    09-19-2015
It's my first tier 10 tank which performs ok. Nothing interesting about it except alpha damage and workable armor. The gun trolls harder than any other. I play with Strv 103B these days to complete personal missions and just yesterday I had a couple of games with 4-5k damage. I suggest you to try 103B because I find it more consistent in dealing damage than the Jg. Pz. E 100.

Zodiac1960s #15 Posted 15 September 2017 - 09:39 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 38468 battles
  • 938
  • [VOMIT] VOMIT
  • Member since:
    03-27-2011

View PostKozzy, on 15 September 2017 - 08:05 AM, said:

 

Show us the replay?

I never made a replay and didn't do it this time either.  I have no reason to lie and do not care if you believe it or not. I have better things to do than make up stuff here. 



kiolvi #16 Posted 15 September 2017 - 09:46 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 51169 battles
  • 228
  • [T-BAD] T-BAD
  • Member since:
    09-02-2013

It is called german accuracy.Edited. Try playing grille and jgpz100 derp gun trolling is nothing compared to it. Same in leopard. But again, germans are known for their good sense of humor, so maybe that is why their guns troll so much in a russian game....

 

 

 

This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks. 

 

 


Edited by VMX, 15 September 2017 - 04:04 PM.


Kozzy #17 Posted 15 September 2017 - 09:53 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 38855 battles
  • 2,705
  • [EAB2] EAB2
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011

View PostBlind_Hate, on 15 September 2017 - 08:39 AM, said:

I never made a replay and didn't do it this time either.  I have no reason to lie and do not care if you believe it or not. I have better things to do than make up stuff here. 

 

You care enough to post this idiotic thread, though.  

 

Funny how those that make the boldest claims on these forums provide the least evidence to back them up.  Even replays which are ridiculously easy to record (1 tick box) and take up such a tiny amount of room,  Why even make this thread?  Only tin foil bobs are likely to believe you without any kind of proof... hmm... 



ZlatanArKung #18 Posted 15 September 2017 - 10:11 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 5,112
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View PostHaZardeur, on 15 September 2017 - 08:24 AM, said:

 

Thats the most annoying thing... sling a shell big as a car towards a light tank and hit them for crit no damage, apart from that I cant complain.

 

It doesnt do damage because you miss the hull.



Zodiac1960s #19 Posted 15 September 2017 - 11:05 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 38468 battles
  • 938
  • [VOMIT] VOMIT
  • Member since:
    03-27-2011

View PostKozzy, on 15 September 2017 - 08:53 AM, said:

 

You care enough to post this idiotic thread, though.  

 

Funny how those that make the boldest claims on these forums provide the least evidence to back them up.  Even replays which are ridiculously easy to record (1 tick box) and take up such a tiny amount of room,  Why even make this thread?  Only tin foil bobs are likely to believe you without any kind of proof... hmm... 

Why do you insult me and call it idiotic?  

I said I don't care if you believe be, I did not say I don't care about my own topic.  

Learn to read.  

I made the thread to create awareness and see if I was the only one with this experience. 

 

So sorry you HAD to see it..



Kozzy #20 Posted 15 September 2017 - 11:30 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 38855 battles
  • 2,705
  • [EAB2] EAB2
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011

View PostBlind_Hate, on 15 September 2017 - 10:05 AM, said:

Why do you insult me and call it idiotic?  

I said I don't care if you believe be, I did not say I don't care about my own topic.  

Learn to read.  

I made the thread to create awareness and see if I was the only one with this experience. 

 

So sorry you HAD to see it..

 

I didn't insult you, I insulted the idiotic thread.  Raise awareness of what?  You have shown us nothing of which we should now be aware.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users