Jump to content


old tanks vs new tanks


  • Please log in to reply
15 replies to this topic

davey1uk #1 Posted 16 September 2017 - 08:51 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 28828 battles
  • 35
  • [TOES] TOES
  • Member since:
    07-26-2011
here is one that wants looking at we play WOT' but there is a problem with the game WOT has got 1940 tanks against 1961 tanks so it's tanks from world war 2 against tanks from the cold war 'its no wonder that the match making is all wrong.

Junglist_ #2 Posted 17 September 2017 - 12:26 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 37130 battles
  • 1,348
  • Member since:
    06-17-2013
27k games and OP comes to the conclusion that the issue with the matchmaking is tanks from different eras...

Spurtung #3 Posted 17 September 2017 - 01:14 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 63703 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostJunglist_, on 17 September 2017 - 01:26 AM, said:

27k games and OP comes to the conclusion that the issue with the matchmaking is tanks from different eras...

 

Next he'll say the problem is having German and British tanks on the same team, it just makes the MM go muy loco.

Obsessive_Compulsive #4 Posted 17 September 2017 - 08:50 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 25942 battles
  • 8,048
  • [ADUK] ADUK
  • Member since:
    09-09-2014
davey.. I do not normally bring stats into it but you have 6 WN8 in your patton. ( I rounded that up) and on that basis alone I am telling you to shut up.:teethhappy:

Browarszky #5 Posted 17 September 2017 - 09:19 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 16096 battles
  • 3,734
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013

I don't like the way they mix up things either. WoT cocktail leaves me feeling shaken and stunned.

 

(I just bet they will edit that word...)



Dava_117 #6 Posted 17 September 2017 - 10:46 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 19480 battles
  • 3,300
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

Design age are not important in this game, cause it don't consider tecnological improvements. Stats also aren't histotically accurate too. 

And has an exaple of why you are wrong, take a KV-4 (design from the early 40s) and put it in same time design (pz1-3, matilda, amx40). Would that be balanced?

Instead it can fight well in tier 8.


Edited by Dava_117, 17 September 2017 - 10:46 AM.


LCpl_Jones #7 Posted 17 September 2017 - 02:53 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 9770 battles
  • 714
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    06-17-2017

View PostDava_117, on 17 September 2017 - 10:46 AM, said:

And has an exaple of why you are wrong, take a KV-4 (design from the early 40s) and put it in same time design (pz1-3, matilda, amx40). Would that be balanced?

 

poor example considering the pz1 started production and the matilda was at prototypes in the mid 1930's, about 6 years before the kv-4 even became a paper exercise

Dava_117 #8 Posted 17 September 2017 - 02:59 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 19480 battles
  • 3,300
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

View PostLCpl_Jones, on 17 September 2017 - 02:53 PM, said:

 

poor example considering the pz1 started production and the matilda was at prototypes in the mid 1930's, about 6 years before the kv-4 even became a paper exercise

 

my fault, but instead of tier 8 it should be then a tier 5-6 if you consider just the design age...

Dava_117 #9 Posted 17 September 2017 - 03:00 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 19480 battles
  • 3,300
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

View PostLCpl_Jones, on 17 September 2017 - 02:53 PM, said:

 

poor example considering the pz1 started production and the matilda was at prototypes in the mid 1930's, about 6 years before the kv-4 even became a paper exercise

 

my fault, but instead of tier 8 it should be then a tier 5-6 if you consider just the design age...

Dava_117 #10 Posted 17 September 2017 - 03:01 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 19480 battles
  • 3,300
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014
Sorry, my phone double posted it...

NervosCuNervii #11 Posted 18 September 2017 - 11:29 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 21833 battles
  • 534
  • [D57T] D57T
  • Member since:
    08-31-2013
Sneaky Germans made the Maus because they knew the (Bela)rusians will match it against their newer designs even with a 20 year advantage.

Homer_J #12 Posted 18 September 2017 - 11:34 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 28767 battles
  • 30,045
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View Postdavey1uk, on 16 September 2017 - 08:51 PM, said:

here is one that wants looking at we play WOT' but there is a problem with the game WOT has got 1940 tanks against 1961 tanks so it's tanks from world war 2 against tanks from the cold war 'its no wonder that the match making is all wrong.

 

They aren't real you know, every tank in WoT is using the exact same 20th century digital technology.  With a few tweaks of numbers an MS-1 can be a match for a Maus.

Hedgehog1963 #13 Posted 18 September 2017 - 11:34 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 51282 battles
  • 7,473
  • [DIRTY] DIRTY
  • Member since:
    04-26-2011

View Postdavey1uk, on 16 September 2017 - 07:51 PM, said:

here is one that wants looking at we play WOT' but there is a problem with the game WOT has got 1940 tanks against 1961 tanks so it's tanks from world war 2 against tanks from the cold war 'its no wonder that the match making is all wrong.

 

Funny how the MAUS, a tank from "1946" is the best, isn't it?

Dundato #14 Posted 18 September 2017 - 11:40 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 26310 battles
  • 715
  • Member since:
    06-09-2012

View Postdavey1uk, on 16 September 2017 - 07:51 PM, said:

here is one that wants looking at we play WOT' but there is a problem with the game WOT has got 1940 tanks against 1961 tanks so it's tanks from world war 2 against tanks from the cold war 'its no wonder that the match making is all wrong.

 

Should the title not be real tanks v made up tanks

Browarszky #15 Posted 18 September 2017 - 02:57 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 16096 battles
  • 3,734
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013

View PostDundato, on 18 September 2017 - 10:40 AM, said:

 

Should the title not be real tanks v made up tanks

 

Guess which ones will win.

TungstenHitman #16 Posted 18 September 2017 - 03:29 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 22178 battles
  • 4,070
  • Member since:
    08-28-2016

View Postdavey1uk, on 16 September 2017 - 07:51 PM, said:

WOT has got 1940 tanks against 1961 tanks so it's tanks from world war 2 against tanks from the cold war 'its no wonder that the match making is all wrong.

 

The era of tanks has nothing at all to do with anything in this game Davey they are just kept to around the same era to try and keep to some logical progression path but all these tanks are obviosly is a set of instructions with a visual representation for us to see as we the player, give instructions to these binary codes.. it's the allocated statistics that governs how these tanks behave, they are all 2017 tanks lol.. you could transfer the program of a Maus onto a KV1 or the program for a tier3 pz1c onto a Type5 and it would race around just the same and get 1 shot by a Hetzer just the same, a Type5 1 shot by a Hetzer.. anyway you get the point. Forget all the era and years etc these tanks are nothing about what they are in the real world, in the real world an IS3 may well have been utter trash.

 

Edit- you could make these tanks all look like sheep, they're not actual tanks lol


Edited by TungstenHitman, 18 September 2017 - 03:30 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users