Jump to content


Gold ammo in Common-Test


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

RiflemanThick #1 Posted 16 September 2017 - 08:59 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12554 battles
  • 205
  • [EGYPT] EGYPT
  • Member since:
    10-25-2012

Hello and welcome to my thread, Today I'm going to talk about something WG knows and everyone knows, The Gold ammo.

One simple question: How the [edited]we supposed to test the armor in Common-test to give suggestions with all the stupid gold spam?

The gold ammo really needs a rework because WG is ****** the game.



Sergeant_Antaro_Chronus #2 Posted 17 September 2017 - 12:47 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 13564 battles
  • 615
  • [EL-G] EL-G
  • Member since:
    06-24-2013
Is there a reason why they shouldn't? Armor is irrelevant anyway, not spamming gold in the common test means nothing if they can penetrate you in the live with gold anyway....

Edited by Sergeant_Antaro_Chronus, 17 September 2017 - 12:52 AM.


Balc0ra #3 Posted 17 September 2017 - 01:14 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 63714 battles
  • 14,974
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
That's what's private rooms are for. So you can take your time to test armor on CT. Even if everyone spammed normal ammo. CT is not the ideal place to test such things anyway. As most of them are playing the new tanks, or buffed tanks. So next CT, high tiers will be full of high pen UK guns. Just as the last one was full of Chinese and French TD's to get anything valid out of it.

denisdenikr #4 Posted 17 September 2017 - 01:27 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 16463 battles
  • 432
  • [RDDTF] RDDTF
  • Member since:
    07-10-2015
well... nowdays, super havys armor is balanced around gold ammo, so you actualy can test it on test servers...

RiflemanThick #5 Posted 17 September 2017 - 12:07 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12554 battles
  • 205
  • [EGYPT] EGYPT
  • Member since:
    10-25-2012

View PostSergeant_Antaro_Chronus, on 17 September 2017 - 01:47 AM, said:

Is there a reason why they shouldn't? Armor is irrelevant anyway, not spamming gold in the common test means nothing if they can penetrate you in the live with gold anyway....

 

Then premium should be removed or reworked on both servers(Main&Test).

View PostBalc0ra, on 17 September 2017 - 02:14 AM, said:

That's what's private rooms are for. So you can take your time to test armor on CT. Even if everyone spammed normal ammo. CT is not the ideal place to test such things anyway. As most of them are playing the new tanks, or buffed tanks. So next CT, high tiers will be full of high pen UK guns. Just as the last one was full of Chinese and French TD's to get anything valid out of it.

 

CT is supposed to be the perfect place to test new tanks but WG just needs a better brain.

View Postdenisdenikr, on 17 September 2017 - 02:27 AM, said:

well... nowdays, super havys armor is balanced around gold ammo, so you actualy can test it on test servers...

 

I think you're talking about Maus that left without a nerf and Type 5 heavy with the small nerf and Defender which I have no idea why is the heck wg added it.

 



Jigabachi #6 Posted 17 September 2017 - 12:39 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17852 battles
  • 18,166
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

View PostRiflemanThick, on 17 September 2017 - 12:07 PM, said:

CT is supposed to be the perfect place to test new tanks [...].

In the controlled environment of a training match, yes.



WindSpIitter1 #7 Posted 17 September 2017 - 02:01 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 275 battles
  • 1,035
  • [-UM] -UM
  • Member since:
    01-13-2017

View PostRiflemanThick, on 17 September 2017 - 12:07 PM, said:

 

CT is supposed to be the perfect place to test new tanks but WG just needs a better brain.

 

Yeah because common test is the perfect place to test with everyone having 5 skill crews, infinite credits and there's at least 10 of the new FOTM tanks every time. That and people who've never played tier 10 spamming tier 10 while they can or trying out [edited]tanks like the 183. 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users