Jump to content


personal missions and rhm. pzw.

#shit #bad #sobad

  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

Ivcha993 #1 Posted 19 September 2017 - 02:16 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 18290 battles
  • 10
  • [C-O-S] C-O-S
  • Member since:
    12-23-2015

Firstly what i want to point out is THAT MOST OF THE [edited]MISSIONS REQUIRE YOU TO SURVIVE, and the majority of this community still requires their mothers to spoon-feed them(most probably).

 

Secondly, please dont nerf RHM light's alpha, its so bad already if you give it 320 alpha it'll have nothing to offer at all.

 

P.S. great matchmaking, seen people with 4000 wn8 have 43% wins in the last week. GJ wargaming



Balc0ra #2 Posted 19 September 2017 - 03:13 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 64454 battles
  • 15,472
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View PostIvcha993, on 19 September 2017 - 02:16 PM, said:

Secondly, please dont nerf RHM light's alpha, its so bad already if you give it 320 alpha it'll have nothing to offer at all.

 

You want to hit less and do more damage? Or hit more and do less damage? As more people complained about he "un-German" accuracy vs the alpha. Thus the reason for the change.

 

View PostIvcha993, on 19 September 2017 - 02:16 PM, said:

P.S. great matchmaking, seen people with 4000 wn8 have 43% wins in the last week. GJ wargaming

 

Unless you are saying that they need to win more so you can lose more often, to reflect your base WR. As both your WN8 and WR is the past week is higher then your average. So why complain? But then again you see how well the perfect MM worked for AW. It was so good that it killed off PVP.  As there people that was used to a 60% WR lost more, and sub 50% players won more to even it more out. 



Press2ForSkill #3 Posted 19 September 2017 - 06:24 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 1 battle
  • 689
  • Member since:
    06-01-2016
The tank already sucked so why did u get it in the first place?

Ivcha993 #4 Posted 20 September 2017 - 12:21 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 18290 battles
  • 10
  • [C-O-S] C-O-S
  • Member since:
    12-23-2015

View PostBalc0ra, on 19 September 2017 - 03:13 PM, said:

 

You want to hit less and do more damage? Or hit more and do less damage? As more people complained about he "un-German" accuracy vs the alpha. Thus the reason for the change.

 

 

Unless you are saying that they need to win more so you can lose more often, to reflect your base WR. As both your WN8 and WR is the past week is higher then your average. So why complain? But then again you see how well the perfect MM worked for AW. It was so good that it killed off PVP.  As there people that was used to a 60% WR lost more, and sub 50% players won more to even it more out. 

 

point1: no i want it do hit more and do the same damage, since its a piece of crapas it is.

point2: put a 100% wr person in a +2 mm for pretty much 90% of the games, and give them absolute autists as a team and they wont retain their WR. its retarded and annoying to be on the losing side no matter what you do






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users