Jump to content


T34-3 ignored ?


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

scorpiontank1 #1 Posted 22 September 2017 - 11:12 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 26325 battles
  • 837
  • [ARG] ARG
  • Member since:
    10-12-2012
In common test video , they didn't mention the one tank that needed the most buffs , t34-3 , any info on this ? 

tajj7 #2 Posted 22 September 2017 - 11:18 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 25404 battles
  • 13,836
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    03-30-2014

It's been buffed on test -

 

Posted Image



Search_Warrant #3 Posted 22 September 2017 - 11:22 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 27190 battles
  • 6,139
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011

They dident mention it but Tanksgg was updated it got Type59 armor and the aimtime buff. tho the armor buff and aimtime buff on Tanksgg make it look less terrible aimtime wise, but Type59 got a mega all-round aimtime buff on the gun, again making it better over T-34-3 and will never be on par as long as Type59 gets that -7 gundep and T-34-3 gets -5, so in fact Type59 armor can be made more effective use of due to more gundep = more slope. meanwhile T-34-3 cannot.

 

Wish they would take off the Tracks on the front of the hull and the side turret. they need to ether make ALL track on hulls/turrets actual armor or NO tank has it. its a stupid concept that needs fixing. i shouldent have to go tanksgg and see if a tanks track pieces are armor or not. its stupid. people will think T-34-3 tracks add armor when it doesent.


Edited by Search_Warrant, 22 September 2017 - 11:23 AM.


Comrade_Renamon #4 Posted 23 September 2017 - 09:01 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 9835 battles
  • 859
  • Member since:
    09-27-2011
Apparently, if tanks.gg is correct, the T-34-3 can also depress the gun at the engine deck now, before it was 0 and now you can depress -4 there too!




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users