Jump to content


AMX 30 and 30B


  • This topic is locked This is a poll-only topic
7 replies to this topic

Poll: AMX 30 or 30b (1 member has cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

Should amx 30 and 30b not have more penetration?

  1. Yes (1 vote [100.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 100.00%

  2. No (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. No opinion (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

How much penetration?

  1. 259 (BC 25T) (1 vote [100.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 100.00%

  2. More (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. No opinion (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Better penetration at the expense of reloading?

  1. Yes (1 vote [100.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 100.00%

  2. No (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. No opinion (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Hide poll

Y3tik #1 Posted 24 September 2017 - 12:55 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 19715 battles
  • 30
  • Member since:
    03-09-2013

Hello,
The last amx 30 and 30b patches are not quite right, the tower is good to get a gain, but 248 penetration on the division is definitely not enough, bc 25t in the same department only the magazine has this penetration by 10 more so i think the amx 30 and 30b should have the same. Thank you in advance :)

 

In addition, the pot on the tower is too big, so strengthening the tower did not give anything, I would propose to change the tower on the one with the amx 30 in the first view which is perfect :)

 

 

 


Edited by Y3tik, 05 October 2017 - 11:37 PM.


Sfinski #2 Posted 24 September 2017 - 02:56 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 30958 battles
  • 2,379
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013
So how much dpm should it lose after you buff the pen?

SuedKAT #3 Posted 24 September 2017 - 03:03 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 12154 battles
  • 6,291
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-21-2014

This must be the weirdest worded post I've read in while, however regarding the pen (not sure what the "division" means in this context), that's what you get for great DPM, lower the DPM and you can raise the pen. I assume the "pot" on the "tower" is the cupola on the turret and that's there as a frontal weakspot, all tanks used to have those back in the day, now though they are rare so yeah I guess that can go.


Edited by SuedKAT, 24 September 2017 - 03:04 PM.


Shaade_Silentpaw #4 Posted 24 September 2017 - 03:14 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 22026 battles
  • 355
  • Member since:
    10-12-2015

Good job there, google translate :P

 

I have to agree with the cupola issue though - it always seemed pretty ridiculous to me, and I don't even have/want the 30b.



Panzerfighter_ #5 Posted 24 September 2017 - 03:19 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 60993 battles
  • 6,345
  • [322] 322
  • Member since:
    04-19-2011
Why should u lower the dpm, if the tank would be so great now why dont u see it a single time in ranked? 260mm pen would be fine.

Y3tik #6 Posted 25 September 2017 - 10:02 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 19715 battles
  • 30
  • Member since:
    03-09-2013

Sorry for my english, i use only small version xD 

 

In my opinion they could reduce the dpm and increase pen at least for the bc25t, rest is okay :)



magkiln #7 Posted 25 September 2017 - 01:52 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 22680 battles
  • 731
  • [EKKE] EKKE
  • Member since:
    09-21-2015
The cupola is insane. This thing has almost no armour anyway, so you don't need a weakspot. Take that thing off and put it on top of the Chrysler tank.

Bad_Mojo_incoming #8 Posted 26 September 2017 - 06:54 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 19606 battles
  • 207
  • [THIK] THIK
  • Member since:
    03-06-2014
Are these two tanks worth the pain in the butt grinding through the BC 12t? Cz right now, I have about 70k XP with it, and I'm close to ripping my hair out, it's such a garbage tank.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users