Jump to content


Unbalanced Games


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
18 replies to this topic

Oitaeduard #1 Posted 25 September 2017 - 05:06 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 10239 battles
  • 3
  • [B15M] B15M
  • Member since:
    04-10-2014
The games now is unbalanced i play 15 games , 0 wins. 

Aikl #2 Posted 25 September 2017 - 05:08 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 25141 battles
  • 3,984
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011
Was there, by chance, one thing in common for all those fifteen matches?

Richthoffen #3 Posted 25 September 2017 - 05:09 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 26504 battles
  • 2,444
  • Member since:
    12-23-2011
MM is unbalanced, the game is just as balanced as it always was

Ferditude #4 Posted 25 September 2017 - 05:13 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 862 battles
  • 421
  • Member since:
    11-22-2016

View PostAikl, on 25 September 2017 - 05:08 PM, said:

Was there, by chance, one thing in common for all those fifteen matches?

 

so you believe that this 1x player is so bad, his playing over rules the other 29 players?

Mees thinks u need one of your shill buddies to explain the game mechanics to u.



Isharial #5 Posted 25 September 2017 - 05:19 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 18284 battles
  • 2,130
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-19-2015

View PostFerditude, on 25 September 2017 - 05:13 PM, said:

 

so you believe that this 1x player is so bad, his playing over rules the other 29 players?

Mees thinks u need one of your shill buddies to explain the game mechanics to u.

 

now as much as your logic has reason, its honestly not true that often...

 

the chances of a player having zero influence over atleast 1 battle in 15 battles is slim... the chances of them having absolutely no way of turning the game from a loss to a win is even slimmer in 15 battles


 

5 battles, improbable, but happens

10 battles, getting slightly less common

15? slim chance of that


 

the player in question could have done more to help win the battle, and since we cannot see the replays of those 15 battles, who are we to know what really happened?

for all we know the guy could have been top tier in all 15 and did 0 damage in all 15 but thinks they can win every battle....


 

OP if you going to make threads like this, atleast include your replays



Aikl #6 Posted 25 September 2017 - 05:21 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 25141 battles
  • 3,984
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

View PostFerditude, on 25 September 2017 - 04:13 PM, said:

 

so you believe that this 1x player is so bad, his playing over rules the other 29 players?

Mees thinks u need one of your shill buddies to explain the game mechanics to u.

 

Feel free to explain OP's problem, if you think that this isn't a problem that can be explained by statistics (in particular small sample size) or by lack of player contribution.

 

Oh, and a 'shill' wouldn't spend half his forum time kicking at Wargaming. Take your foolish attempt at logical fallacies to some fringe discussion board, along with your childish text message-lingo.

 

PS: If you believe MM is rigged, you probably believe in some hilariously funny conspiracy theories.

 


Edited by Aikl, 25 September 2017 - 05:23 PM.


deivio82 #7 Posted 25 September 2017 - 05:46 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 45347 battles
  • 127
  • [LT-UK] LT-UK
  • Member since:
    05-20-2012

players should not play  with those blue stats *Edited

it should be leagues. like beginners rookies, masters. noobs should never play aginst pro  players . its *Edited common sence


Edited by Nohe21, 26 September 2017 - 11:47 AM.
*This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks.


Isharial #8 Posted 25 September 2017 - 05:52 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 18284 battles
  • 2,130
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-19-2015

View Postdeivio82, on 25 September 2017 - 05:46 PM, said:

players should not play  with those blue stats *Edited . 

it should be leagues. like beginners rookies, masters. noobs should never play aginst pro  players . its *Edited common sence

 

 

sigh... you don't understand how the game works do you?

 

if this kind of system, or "skill based matchmaking" was implemented, everyone regardless of whether they tried to win, or tried to troll, would end up at 50% winrate...

it doesn't work, it rewards the stupid and idiotic, and penalises those that try to win....


 

its common sense, but yours is broken :facepalm:

 

if you want to win, you have to try to win, you actually have to put the effort in to do so....



Aikl #9 Posted 25 September 2017 - 05:53 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 25141 battles
  • 3,984
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

View PostFerditude, on 25 September 2017 - 04:38 PM, said:

 

mm post set off your alarm?

Hmm like thinking of others as children?

think you should be careful

 

Oh, yeah, I'm totally a shill working undercover as a forum ranter just to cover up the 'MM is rigged' conspiracy.

 

Anyway, you don't seem to like facts, nor to read stuff. You're pretty good at the logical fallacies, though. Cherrypicking, threats... stuff that you can expect some lowbrow to use after reading a manual. l wouldn't bet on me being the shill between us. It would be pretty obvious who's in on this for five cents per post and who's doing it out of his own free will.

 

View Postdeivio82, on 25 September 2017 - 04:46 PM, said:

players should not play  with those blue stats asholes . 

it should be leagues. like beginners rookies, masters. noobs should never play aginst pro  players . its fcking common sence

 

​You can bet your crap-cannon that if skill-matchmaking was implemented, players would just bot to decrease their own skill. You might've noticed that there's no real penalty to simply 'botting' out games with minimum effort. 

Edited by Aikl, 25 September 2017 - 05:56 PM.


jack_timber #10 Posted 25 September 2017 - 05:55 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31120 battles
  • 1,593
  • Member since:
    07-26-2014

View Postdeivio82, on 25 September 2017 - 04:46 PM, said:

players should not play  with those blue stats *Edited

it should be leagues. like beginners rookies, masters. noobs should never play aginst pro  players . its *Edited common sence

While your thoughts on leagues have some merit unfortunately you language does not. I realise English may not be your first language moderation of cussing will get your message across much easier.

Feel like a moderator but the younger generation also read these forums, would you want your kids to read this bile?



Ferditude #11 Posted 25 September 2017 - 05:56 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 862 battles
  • 421
  • Member since:
    11-22-2016

View PostAikl, on 25 September 2017 - 05:53 PM, said:

 

Oh, yeah, I'm totally a shill working undercover as a forum ranter just to cover up the 'MM is rigged' conspiracy.

 

Anyway, you don't seem to like facts, nor to read stuff. You're pretty good at the logical fallacies, though. Cherrypicking, threats... stuff that you can expect some lowbrow to use after reading a manual. l wouldn't bet on me being the shill between us. It would be pretty obvious who's in on this for five cents per post and who's doing it out of his own free will.

Not 5c, but player reputation



Aikl #12 Posted 25 September 2017 - 06:00 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 25141 battles
  • 3,984
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

View PostFerditude, on 25 September 2017 - 04:56 PM, said:

Not 5c, but player reputation

 

I like that you're basically admitting to being a shill, even if it doesn't make sense.

 

If you posted for reputation, I'd expect you to use your normal account.



Bucifel #13 Posted 25 September 2017 - 06:09 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27715 battles
  • 1,373
  • [3NRGY] 3NRGY
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013

View PostRichthoffen, on 25 September 2017 - 05:09 PM, said:

MM is unbalanced, the game is just as balanced as it always was

not really...since WG removed a lot of weakpoints to encourage goldspam and introduced those folish OP premium tanks



Isharial #14 Posted 25 September 2017 - 06:20 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 18284 battles
  • 2,130
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-19-2015

View PostFerditude, on 25 September 2017 - 05:54 PM, said:

 

call for more reinforcements, your insults arent new enough, they bounce without rnge

 

I take it you cannot read? where on earth did I insult you? unless pointing out that you originally resorting to calling people "shill"... oh wait, that would make you the insulter, no one else :facepalm:


 

View PostAikl, on 25 September 2017 - 06:00 PM, said:

 

I like that you're basically admitting to being a shill, even if it doesn't make sense.

 

If you posted for reputation, I'd expect you to use your normal account.

 

this ^


 


 

 



Ferditude #15 Posted 25 September 2017 - 06:36 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 862 battles
  • 421
  • Member since:
    11-22-2016

View PostAikl, on 25 September 2017 - 06:00 PM, said:

 

I like that you're basically admitting to being a shill, even if it doesn't make sense.

 

If you posted for reputation, I'd expect you to use your normal account.

 

shills post for the company, not talking about problems 

Quick ask a dinger for a refresher before they/u loose reputation



AxelClust #16 Posted 25 September 2017 - 06:47 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 38313 battles
  • 42
  • [NEOSA] NEOSA
  • Member since:
    01-30-2012
Since it's a luck based game you re playing, this things can happen. 

Jigabachi #17 Posted 25 September 2017 - 07:27 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17746 battles
  • 17,615
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

View PostFerditude, on 25 September 2017 - 05:20 PM, said:

Spoiler

Does failtrolling and hiding behind an alt account yield a positive rigging bonus, too?



Shivva #18 Posted 25 September 2017 - 07:28 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 29175 battles
  • 1,909
  • [J_A_G] J_A_G
  • Member since:
    05-20-2012

View PostAikl, on 25 September 2017 - 05:00 PM, said:

 

I like that you're basically admitting to being a shill, even if it doesn't make sense.

 

If you posted for reputation, I'd expect you to use your normal account.

 

I think he did post using his normal account...for the opening post anyway then realised his mistake and jumped onto his fail-reroll.

Edited by Shivva, 25 September 2017 - 07:28 PM.


Nohe21 #19 Posted 26 September 2017 - 11:38 AM

    Moderator

  • Moderator
  • 764 battles
  • 286
  • [WG_M] WG_M
  • Member since:
    05-23-2017

*Thread closed as we already have a pinned Matchmaking discussion Thread:

 

http://forum.worldoftanks.eu/index.php?/topic/635504-matchmaking-discussion-thread/

 

You can post your thoughts about this topic there.

 

Thank you.

 

Edit: I have deleted some non constructive posts. Please, be respectful with each other and don´t flame, the only thing you can get with that behavior is to be sanctioned. 


Edited by Nohe21, 26 September 2017 - 11:55 AM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users