Jump to content


Gameplay without gold

object 260

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
19 replies to this topic

JakeRoook #1 Posted 28 September 2017 - 03:44 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 260 battles
  • 276
  • Member since:
    04-20-2013

This guys on hes videos shows how beautiful battles is on classical tanks without gold.

Now i have questions:

1. How anyone cannot understand what free to play conception without gold is best and must be?

2. Why those who understand it keep loading gold rounds? Where is your protest your interest in fair play? What are you trying to show in how you win by shooting premium rounds?

3. If community contributors understand it why they promote gold rounds shooting and videomakers reviewing pay to win tanks? How can you be proud what you a WOT player if your game is pay to win?

4. Why you are not fighting for  good look of game?

5. Why you shoot gold? Why you participating in wallet measure? And why you r not blaming and not judging it?

6. Who needs guides on how to donate more or become WG league slave or crapper on hire( they all propose premium comforts on tournaments to new players). What do you show by this pay to win conception? Who need pay to penetrate dumb game?

7. How can you be proud developer or director who sells game comforts and now even victoryes? All the developers creative work is covered by this p2w concept and potentialy normal community is not exist just becouse really competitive players and those who interested in tanks hystory are frightened by this cover . Not even gona tell anything about comfort-monetizing spot mechanics....

 


Edited by JakeRoook, 28 September 2017 - 04:06 AM.


Ceeb #2 Posted 28 September 2017 - 04:03 AM

    Major General

  • Beta Tester
  • 30073 battles
  • 5,019
  • Member since:
    01-14-2011
I rarely shoot gold.

When I do. Im shooting a Type 4 or 5, or a maus

JakeRoook #3 Posted 28 September 2017 - 04:08 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 260 battles
  • 276
  • Member since:
    04-20-2013

View PostCeeb, on 28 September 2017 - 03:03 AM, said:

I rarely shoot gold.

When I do. Im shooting a Type 4 or 5, or a maus

When you must flank them© Sergey Burkatovski: "But Victor Kisly told me..."

Btw, flanking is still works and performable.


Edited by JakeRoook, 28 September 2017 - 04:10 AM.


RamRaid90 #4 Posted 28 September 2017 - 04:22 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 19672 battles
  • 5,847
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

View PostJakeRoook, on 28 September 2017 - 03:08 AM, said:

 

Btw, flanking is still works and performable.

 

:teethhappy:

ogremage #5 Posted 28 September 2017 - 05:10 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31604 battles
  • 1,348
  • [KAZNA] KAZNA
  • Member since:
    06-26-2011
I think the solution is to limit the number of gold shells a tank can carry in battle (depends from tank to tank, on average allow 20% gold but for tanks with super low ammo capacity it can be more).

Homer_J #6 Posted 28 September 2017 - 05:30 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27068 battles
  • 27,667
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View Postogremage, on 28 September 2017 - 05:10 AM, said:

I think the solution is to limit the number of gold shells a tank can carry in battle (depends from tank to tank, on average allow 20% gold but for tanks with super low ammo capacity it can be more).

 

Because they will hurt (your feelings) less if it's limited supply.

 

Most players don;t shoot 20% of their ammo, your proposal will make no difference at all.

 

The solution to premium ammo is simple.  Don't get shot.  Also, man up and accept it as part of the game.  Then use it to your advantage.


Edited by Homer_J, 28 September 2017 - 05:30 AM.


SuedKAT #7 Posted 28 September 2017 - 05:36 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 12154 battles
  • 6,152
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-21-2014

The important question though is what will this performance yield in terms of Rush Rating and how many sick Sleipnir moves did you pull of to achieve that? 

 

Also I expected the usual "inception" intro with a frame within a frame, must say I'm a bit disappointed on the lack of editing this time!



Ceeb #8 Posted 28 September 2017 - 05:51 AM

    Major General

  • Beta Tester
  • 30073 battles
  • 5,019
  • Member since:
    01-14-2011

View PostJakeRoook, on 28 September 2017 - 03:08 AM, said:

When you must flank them© Sergey Burkatovski: "But Victor Kisly told me..."

Btw, flanking is still works and performable.

 

Ill remember that statement on the next corridor map I get 



The solution is to keep the Penetration but reduce damage.

 

Homer_J #9 Posted 28 September 2017 - 05:56 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27068 battles
  • 27,667
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostCeeb, on 28 September 2017 - 05:54 AM, said:

The solution is to keep the Penetration but reduce damage.

 

So you still get spammed with gold, you still wind up dead, just more slowly.  Yeah, sounds like a great plan.

ogremage #10 Posted 28 September 2017 - 06:03 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31604 battles
  • 1,348
  • [KAZNA] KAZNA
  • Member since:
    06-26-2011

View PostHomer_J, on 28 September 2017 - 04:30 AM, said:

 

Because they will hurt (your feelings) less if it's limited supply.

 

Most players don;t shoot 20% of their ammo, your proposal will make no difference at all.

 

The solution to premium ammo is simple.  Don't get shot.  Also, man up and accept it as part of the game.  Then use it to your advantage.

 

I wouldn't be surprised if I'm not worse at not getting shot than you are. Much room for improvement still.

 

Anyway, I use more than 20% of my ammo on a bunch of my tanks quite often. A limited loadout adds to the strategic depth as you cannot just spam "2" at start of battle, you have to pick who you shoot with premium and who you shoot with normal ammo.

 

If it's a limited supply then people cannot run full premium ammo load-outs which are quite unfair compared to all the pubbies who wouldn't do this and makes it P2W.

 

I should know as I run 50-50 normal-premium on some of my t8 tanks.



ZlatanArKung #11 Posted 28 September 2017 - 06:09 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 5,112
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014
Bad rush rating for that game imo.
And not even a single Odin made despite having a Odin maneuver tank. Bah.

Jigabachi #12 Posted 28 September 2017 - 07:50 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17746 battles
  • 17,624
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011
Whom does that  alt account belong to again?

Edited by Jigabachi, 28 September 2017 - 07:50 AM.


Ceeb #13 Posted 28 September 2017 - 08:38 AM

    Major General

  • Beta Tester
  • 30073 battles
  • 5,019
  • Member since:
    01-14-2011

View PostHomer_J, on 28 September 2017 - 04:56 AM, said:

 

So you still get spammed with gold, you still wind up dead, just more slowly.  Yeah, sounds like a great plan.

 

Gold isn't the problem.  A lot of the time you can defend against it... Its the HE spamming Super Heavies that are the problem.  Cant defend against it. 

 

Removing "Gold" ammo Isn't the issue. (from here on in I'll just call it Premium) as I haven't used gold to purchase gold ammo since er 2013 ish? 

 

So if its not such a great plan, whats your idea Genius? If you say remove it, I'll just laugh in your face. 


Edited by Ceeb, 28 September 2017 - 08:39 AM.


Geno1isme #14 Posted 28 September 2017 - 10:32 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 40053 battles
  • 6,591
  • [TRYIT] TRYIT
  • Member since:
    09-03-2013
8) why do people create forum troll accounts?

DuncaN_101 #15 Posted 28 September 2017 - 10:37 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 51861 battles
  • 1,496
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011

View PostGeno1isme, on 28 September 2017 - 10:32 AM, said:

8) why do people create forum troll accounts?

Bigger question is why do we all keep feeding him.

 

Anyways... Guess the dipstick is back again.

Any bets on how long he'll last this time? 



Jigabachi #16 Posted 28 September 2017 - 10:52 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17746 battles
  • 17,624
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

View PostDuncaN_101, on 28 September 2017 - 10:37 AM, said:

Any bets on how long he'll last this time? 

Now we have one borderline competent mod who sometimes does what a mid is supposed to. But sadly, I doubt that he isn't around long enough to know our dear failtrolls...



shishx_the_animal #17 Posted 28 September 2017 - 10:54 AM

    Colonel

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 30145 battles
  • 3,861
  • [FAME] FAME
  • Member since:
    04-06-2013

View PostJakeRoook, on 28 September 2017 - 02:44 AM, said:

This guys on hes videos shows how beautiful battles is on classical tanks without gold.

 

You're referring to yourself as "this guys on hes" video. Good job man. How many times were you banned before?

 

For newfags: LuciqueiJourney (which is btw a terribly stolen nickname from two great players) -> Cuck0snest -> JakeRoook


Edited by shishx_the_animal, 28 September 2017 - 10:59 AM.


malachi6 #18 Posted 28 September 2017 - 11:06 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 48609 battles
  • 3,085
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011
If I bounce a guy twice. I press 2.  Problem is, those that spam the stuff.  Can't stop a whale being a whale.  WG love them,

Levana777 #19 Posted 28 September 2017 - 11:11 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 2206 battles
  • 97
  • Member since:
    07-24-2014

No gold? You have to be kidding me. Since you have the Obj 260 you must have spent hundreds of °euros and time to get it. Do that F2P or as a casual player...oh wait you can't.

 

 



Jahrakajin #20 Posted 28 September 2017 - 11:15 AM

  • Guest

This Thread smells of trolling and potential derailing into numerous pages of name calling and flaming. I'll go with my gut feeling for this one and be the party pooper.

Closed. 

 

 







Also tagged with object 260

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users