Jump to content


New Hall of Fame and World of Tanks Rating


  • Please log in to reply
113 replies to this topic

Community #1 Posted 28 September 2017 - 08:04 AM

    Sergeant

  • Content Team
  • 0 battles
  • 25,037
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011
The revamped system hand-picks parameters relevant for a vehicle, letting you compare your combat performance and achievements with tankers from your region.

The full text of the news item

Sixty6 #2 Posted 28 September 2017 - 08:09 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 10233 battles
  • 21
  • Member since:
    04-25-2013
Page not found : https://worldoftanks.../hof_guide_new/

Igor_BL #3 Posted 28 September 2017 - 08:18 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 36664 battles
  • 1,152
  • Member since:
    06-10-2015
Survival rate shouldnt play any part in your rating.

I would like you to reconsider that.

XKeyscore #4 Posted 28 September 2017 - 08:29 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 791 battles
  • 30
  • Member since:
    03-31-2015

View PostIgor_BL, on 28 September 2017 - 08:18 AM, said:

Survival rate shouldnt play any part in your rating.

I would like you to reconsider that.

 

neither damage or winrate

kuchy #5 Posted 28 September 2017 - 08:33 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 53283 battles
  • 1,536
  • [9-TDE] 9-TDE
  • Member since:
    02-01-2011

View PostXKeyscore, on 28 September 2017 - 08:29 AM, said:

 

neither damage or winrate

 

neither damage? From which moon did you fall?

uglycousin #6 Posted 28 September 2017 - 08:41 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 43179 battles
  • 3,541
  • [TFUK] TFUK
  • Member since:
    09-01-2014

In before people from other clans start hating on FAME cuz they got no "Hall of" their own.

 

:P



Ober__ #7 Posted 28 September 2017 - 08:48 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 50672 battles
  • 746
  • [LGACY] LGACY
  • Member since:
    09-01-2014
RIP XVM?

Dzeimsiukasss #8 Posted 28 September 2017 - 09:01 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 15800 battles
  • 1
  • [GW_LT] GW_LT
  • Member since:
    03-12-2013
Wg you do changes in wrrong place. First playing in platoon is so shi... If we play 3 of as in platoon we are all the time in the bottom,becouse mm is 3-5-7  wtf? Its not funny to play in platton anymore,and players leaving game,how you dont understand?

Sixty6 #9 Posted 28 September 2017 - 09:08 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 10233 battles
  • 21
  • Member since:
    04-25-2013

I think this system might work , it takes into account every aspect : Damage , spotting , damage blocked etc; should encourage players to play to the tank's strengths.

 

And yeah sometimes kill securing is better in order to win the game, if you wanna farm WN8 and you had the chance to do let's say 390 dmg or 10 dmg and kill a tank, you would go for the damage just because WN8 or mark of excellence.

 

The staying alive part :

PROS: People should learn different ways of using their amour effectively , stop them from yoloing. Should learn to use map in order to stay with the team .

CONS: Might be very campy, and on some maps like Erlenberg standard will be very boring. Might result in more draws. 

 

And of they are using server statistics to compare your performance with the average performance of a certain vehicle , it should be more precise.

 

I really like this ( encourages players to play high tiers.  ) ; even tho you can argue someone can play his e25 and boost his rating.

 

  • Block Quote

    Battle tiers matter, especially if you’re looking into win ratio and the number of destroyed vehicles. To deliver relevant data, the system now creates leaderboards by these two parameters only from players with average battle tier values set at 6.5 or higher.



Cobra6 #10 Posted 28 September 2017 - 09:12 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16320 battles
  • 15,298
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010

Survival rating is completely irrelevant as a metric in a calculation for skill.

 

Skill is realising you need to sacrifice your tank for your team to win. Not hiding like a p@ssy in the back trying to stay alive and then losing.

 

It's better for you to do 4K damage, die and win then doing 4K damage losing but staying alive. Survival rate is as relevant as hitratio in this game.

 

(Spotting)Damage + Kills is what is important as a metric.

 

Damage blocked is indeed relevant for heavies but not until you actually make armour viable against regular ammo, as long as you need HEAT to penetrate it (Hi Maus, Hi Type5 etc.) damage blocked is far less relevant as a metric as well.

 

Cobra 6


Edited by Cobra6, 28 September 2017 - 09:19 AM.


Rosetta_and_Philae #11 Posted 28 September 2017 - 09:25 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 44496 battles
  • 2,130
  • [FOXYR] FOXYR
  • Member since:
    06-14-2011
What about the damage the individual does when facing lower, same and higher tier.  Would be keen to see if some players are deliberately taking on lower tiers during battles.

jagdcommander #12 Posted 28 September 2017 - 09:33 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 39170 battles
  • 860
  • Member since:
    03-18-2011

Like it and agree that survival rate is surely superfluous as a good survival rate seems directly correlated to the damage you do and your ability to use armour? Would be nice for both good (not me!) and bad players though if there was the option to keep stats private.

 

Can WG now make the entire game mod-free?



uglybear #13 Posted 28 September 2017 - 09:37 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 31975 battles
  • 80
  • [S4LT] S4LT
  • Member since:
    06-08-2013

what I really miss is a simple table with all my tanks and their position (with filters), so I dont need to click on each tank separately to see how bad I am in that tank

(or maybe I am to blind to find such a page)

 



Cyclonite_ #14 Posted 28 September 2017 - 09:40 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 26268 battles
  • 87
  • [LEFCC] LEFCC
  • Member since:
    12-22-2014
Works for me. WN8 is a thing of the past anyway, XVM have to manually extract parts of the data and they aren't going to anymore, it's too diffucult and time consuming. Also WN8 doesn't take into account stun, so arty player's wn8 is dropping.

SuddeNStrikes #15 Posted 28 September 2017 - 09:42 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 35536 battles
  • 11
  • [-UBF-] -UBF-
  • Member since:
    11-19-2013

New rating and Hall of fame looks promising, and it is great thing to finally focus on couple of important statistics, different for various vehicle classes and not just pure DMG and nothing else like XVM...

 

BUT it seams to me that, in long terms and when you look at overall numbers, this new rating also have flaws, because it favorites re-rolls and players with just handful of tanks in there's garage, tanks that they constantly play over and over and almost always can perform good in those vehicles!

It favorites them in front of players who played a lot, who play all 5 classes, unlocked hundreds of tanks and played with all of them, hard grinding all those lines for far too long with stock guns and turrets, etc... which all together makes impossible to have good stats on most of those tanks, let alone on all of them...

 

Is that a good or a bad thing for this game and way we look at players around us? I don't know, you tell me...


Edited by SuddeNStrikes, 28 September 2017 - 09:49 AM.


malachi6 #16 Posted 28 September 2017 - 10:00 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 48976 battles
  • 3,183
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011
Needs to be incorporated into the stats pages of both the battle report and the service record.  I assume the beta is just to gauge reaction; then to better implement.  

_Sensation_ #17 Posted 28 September 2017 - 10:15 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 6351 battles
  • 457
  • [TIRED] TIRED
  • Member since:
    01-10-2017

View Post2f45ls6, on 28 September 2017 - 09:40 AM, said:

Works for me. WN8 is a thing of the past anyway, XVM have to manually extract parts of the data and they aren't going to anymore, it's too diffucult and time consuming. Also WN8 doesn't take into account stun, so arty player's wn8 is dropping.

 

No one cares about arty players.

_Sensation_ #18 Posted 28 September 2017 - 10:16 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 6351 battles
  • 457
  • [TIRED] TIRED
  • Member since:
    01-10-2017

View PostSuddeNStrikes, on 28 September 2017 - 09:42 AM, said:

New rating and Hall of fame looks promising, and it is great thing to finally focus on couple of important statistics, different for various vehicle classes and not just pure DMG and nothing else like XVM...

 

BUT it seams to me that, in long terms and when you look at overall numbers, this new rating also have flaws, because it favorites re-rolls and players with just handful of tanks in there's garage, tanks that they constantly play over and over and almost always can perform good in those vehicles!

It favorites them in front of players who played a lot, who play all 5 classes, unlocked hundreds of tanks and played with all of them, hard grinding all those lines for far too long with stock guns and turrets, etc... which all together makes impossible to have good stats on most of those tanks, let alone on all of them...

 

Is that a good or a bad thing for this game and way we look at players around us? I don't know, you tell me...

 

Since it only counts the last 100 games played it doesn't make a difference. 

SlyMeerkat #19 Posted 28 September 2017 - 10:18 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 15576 battles
  • 1,877
  • [FILO] FILO
  • Member since:
    01-29-2013
Looks interesting

uglycousin #20 Posted 28 September 2017 - 10:35 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 43179 battles
  • 3,541
  • [TFUK] TFUK
  • Member since:
    09-01-2014

View Postuglybear, on 28 September 2017 - 11:37 AM, said:

what I really miss is a simple table with all my tanks and their position (with filters), so I dont need to click on each tank separately to see how bad I am in that tank

(or maybe I am to blind to find such a page)

 

 

1. I agree

2. You and I should platoon once just for the lols.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users