Jump to content


Fair Play Policy Update


  • Please log in to reply
224 replies to this topic

Community #1 Posted 28 September 2017 - 03:00 PM

    Sergeant

  • Content Team
  • 0 battles
  • 24,495
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011
Check out the latest info on unfair play and illegal modifications.

The full text of the news item

ogremage #2 Posted 28 September 2017 - 03:03 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31667 battles
  • 1,348
  • [KAZNA] KAZNA
  • Member since:
    06-26-2011

Block Quote

One final category: in-match armor viewer

 


Wait, so is this one allowed? Which mod is this?


Edited by ogremage, 28 September 2017 - 03:03 PM.


_Crusad3r_ #3 Posted 28 September 2017 - 03:04 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 28464 battles
  • 1,563
  • Member since:
    11-22-2012

View Postogremage, on 28 September 2017 - 02:03 PM, said:

 


Wait, so is this one allowed? Which mod is this?

 

Shows armour thickness for tanks I guess?Or maybe a colour schemed armour skin for each tank - thought this was banned? :P

Bracegirdle #4 Posted 28 September 2017 - 03:26 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 18285 battles
  • 1
  • [USAW] USAW
  • Member since:
    11-20-2012
Only way is to ban all Mod's!!!

Mr_Deo #5 Posted 28 September 2017 - 03:33 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 39951 battles
  • 1,585
  • [ESAF] ESAF
  • Member since:
    01-30-2012

GobbleDeGooo

The Tier IX VK 45.02 (P) Ausf. B is now followed by another newcomer, the Pz.Kpfw. VII. This change won't affect the XP you've earned on it. We believe that this functionality provides a significant advantage.

 

Wut?

 



Baleroon #6 Posted 28 September 2017 - 03:46 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 37846 battles
  • 321
  • Member since:
    03-20-2011

Banned 708 players ... 

Banned 708 unnamed players! :great:



ogremage #7 Posted 28 September 2017 - 03:47 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31667 battles
  • 1,348
  • [KAZNA] KAZNA
  • Member since:
    06-26-2011

View PostBracegirdle, on 28 September 2017 - 02:26 PM, said:

Only way is to ban all Mod's!!!

 

No. This would kill the game. There are digital signature based solutions to only allow approved mods.

exori #8 Posted 28 September 2017 - 03:48 PM

    Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 39159 battles
  • 245
  • [I100] I100
  • Member since:
    11-18-2010
way too less banns.

Y_O_L_0 #9 Posted 28 September 2017 - 03:55 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18710 battles
  • 885
  • [Z__G] Z__G
  • Member since:
    12-27-2012
Why not just disable the possibility to add mods to the game? I can't believe that xvm is the thing that keeps this game alive.

Hiarren #10 Posted 28 September 2017 - 04:01 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 7350 battles
  • 7
  • Member since:
    02-26-2013
Which ARE the banned mods? Which ARE the allowed mods? 

Edited by Hiarren, 28 September 2017 - 04:02 PM.


Yaccay #11 Posted 28 September 2017 - 04:06 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31559 battles
  • 1,827
  • Member since:
    11-21-2012
With names (at least for the premanent ban) would be more interesting.

SlyMeerkat #12 Posted 28 September 2017 - 04:08 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 15036 battles
  • 1,706
  • [FILO] FILO
  • Member since:
    01-29-2013
Its a real shame this dont include XVM users :/

Edited by SlyMeerkat, 29 September 2017 - 11:22 AM.


Gebelezis #13 Posted 28 September 2017 - 04:10 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 22212 battles
  • 11
  • Member since:
    08-31-2011

Yeap, useless measures, as allways...

 

This game is full of cheaters. Over 99% of WOT players are cheating and WG come with 2k warnings and 700bans...This is a joke.A bad ones.

And on top of that, they allowed cheats in ranked battles too.

 

All mods should been disabled to be a fair game.Except, maybe for statiscs mods (wn8, eff, winratio, etc) to have some control of your skill progress.

 

One very often scenario:  when you are running in a light tank, in full speed and you  are hit by a 200 wn8 and under 1k battles noob (who is in full run also with light tank)  in track, track+ammorack, tracks +engine, and so on,  shoot after shoot. Or same scene, in medium tank when you are hitted in weakspots by same noob on the move, shoot after shoot.The noob dont know what tank are you running and doesnt care, but aimbot does the job for him. He dont know how to aim (no way to know how to shoot in advance) or what reticle does and he dont care, aimbot know

 

This is not a skil's game or right use of mechanics anymore...Only cheats and RNG will decide your game. Annoing and frustrating

 



SlyMeerkat #14 Posted 28 September 2017 - 04:10 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 15036 battles
  • 1,706
  • [FILO] FILO
  • Member since:
    01-29-2013

View PostHiarren, on 28 September 2017 - 03:01 PM, said:

Which ARE the banned mods? Which ARE the allowed mods? 

 

Don't use them and that way you dont need to worry which are banned and which are not ;)

Ober__ #15 Posted 28 September 2017 - 04:11 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 49735 battles
  • 746
  • [LGACY] LGACY
  • Member since:
    09-01-2014

View PostYaccay, on 28 September 2017 - 05:06 PM, said:

With names (at least for the premanent ban) would be more interesting.

 

Forget it that name&shame, it's against EULA rules.

skebeman #16 Posted 28 September 2017 - 04:28 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 34801 battles
  • 27
  • [CYP] CYP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2012
"banned" 708 players... yeah, ok WG ;)

Schemezoid #17 Posted 28 September 2017 - 04:39 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 20141 battles
  • 2,710
  • Member since:
    11-29-2013
Unfair conduct, is that like your premium shop policy?

CmdRatScabies #18 Posted 28 September 2017 - 04:46 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 35200 battles
  • 3,567
  • Member since:
    10-12-2015

View PostYaccay, on 28 September 2017 - 04:06 PM, said:

With names (at least for the premanent ban) would be more interesting.

 

They should definitely name the permanent ones.

stenlis #19 Posted 28 September 2017 - 04:55 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 46159 battles
  • 18
  • [CRBER] CRBER
  • Member since:
    04-21-2012

Edited by stenlis, 28 September 2017 - 04:55 PM.


Qweski #20 Posted 28 September 2017 - 04:56 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 26616 battles
  • 14
  • Member since:
    04-08-2014
Ok you got most top players with that mods and u dont ban them, and when u get mad when he hit you with forbidden mod with scfi hits/shots you get ban because they report you because some behavior and u get chat ban??? And you report him for forbidden mods and he still plays (its easy to check just put him on black list). So this fair play policy sucks because top dogs with forbidden mods are most the best rank players because they use all kind of scripts/mods or you name it, you can easy check it when u look at their play style (not all top players are covered by this statement) so if WoT have courage many of them would have got locked acc. And the matter of buying/selling acc. some kid give money and get very good acc. and when he starts to play he trolls and destroys game play for rest of team and again we have players who get mad/nervous and similar and guess what, they get ban even they report??? This is for lock acc. too....Soo pls give us chance to write you below report why we reprot him to specify, like in similar games so you will be able to ban better and clear this game of cheaters.

Edited by Qweski, 28 September 2017 - 05:04 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users