Jump to content


T10 tanks with 43 winrate?

T10 tanks with 43 winrate?

  • Please log in to reply
54 replies to this topic

SveZauzeto01 #1 Posted 05 October 2017 - 08:43 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 37039 battles
  • 77
  • Member since:
    04-27-2011

How someone can have 2 T10 tanks 3 T9 tanks with 43 winrate? Can someone explain me this. Only way to have it is to get it with very little or no playing.

Guy for who i asking for is mod and i will not tell his name now but i want to know is there some "special" rules for some "special" people and other rules for the rest?



Pansenmann #2 Posted 05 October 2017 - 08:48 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 34058 battles
  • 12,602
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    08-17-2012

?

 

sorry, can you please ask your second question again?

I didnt understand what you mean.

 

for the first one, well, I have also some tier 9 tanks with even worse winrate.

and my WR on tier 10 tanks is not good either. Better ask Why, not "how".

 


Edited by Pansenmann, 05 October 2017 - 08:50 PM.


CoDiGGo #3 Posted 05 October 2017 - 08:51 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 14997 battles
  • 569
  • [NEUR0] NEUR0
  • Member since:
    05-10-2015

Sure ? mm is strong, see my lovely ranked beta 2 results

 

36 battles, 33% wr, 2905 damage, 12 chevrons in 12 victories, less than 5 times out of top 5 in loser teams.

 



SveZauzeto01 #4 Posted 05 October 2017 - 08:57 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 37039 battles
  • 77
  • Member since:
    04-27-2011

View PostPansenmann, on 05 October 2017 - 07:48 PM, said:

?

 

sorry, can you please ask your second question again?

I didnt understand what you mean.

 

for the first one, well, I have also some tier 9 tanks with even worse winrate.

and my WR on tier 10 tanks is not good either. Better ask Why, not "how".

 

 

I am talking about general winrate not winrate for particular tanks or tiers. Logic is its not easy to get T10 tank with standard WOT rules and u must develop some skill to get it and 43 winrate is zero skill so i just aking is there some other rules for some people.

RamRaid90 #5 Posted 05 October 2017 - 08:58 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 21406 battles
  • 6,459
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

View PostSveZauzeto01, on 05 October 2017 - 07:43 PM, said:

 

Guy for who i asking for is mod

 

Righto kid... :facepalm:

 

Care to exaplin, using your own logic, why your win rate after 504 battles in the E75 is 45%?

 

Care to explain your 46% win rate inthe BC 25t after 332 battles?

 

Perhaps your 44% winrate in the KV-13?

 

Or your 45% in the T-34-85?


Edited by RamRaid90, 05 October 2017 - 09:01 PM.


SveZauzeto01 #6 Posted 05 October 2017 - 09:03 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 37039 battles
  • 77
  • Member since:
    04-27-2011

View PostCoDiGGo, on 05 October 2017 - 07:51 PM, said:

Sure ? mm is strong, see my lovely ranked beta 2 results

 

36 battles, 33% wr, 2905 damage, 12 chevrons in 12 victories, less than 5 times out of top 5 in loser teams.

 

 

I am talking about random and its OK to have 43 with smal number of games, problem is when u have 43 winrate with 10k, 20k, 30k, games how is it possible?
 

View PostRamRaid90, on 05 October 2017 - 07:58 PM, said:

 

Righto kid... :facepalm:

 

Care to exaplin, using your own logic, why your win rate after 504 battles in the E75 is 45%?

 

Care to explain your 46% win rate inthe BC 25t after 332 battles?

 

Perhaps your 44% winrate in the KV-13?

 

Or your 45% in the T-34-85?

 

Yes i will exsplain again, i am talking about total winrate which is one and unique number. U will have smaler winrate with some tanks and higher with some others also depends of number of games. Yes i have 45, 46 winrate with some tanks but my total winrate is 50. Understand now?

You have 0 winrate for some tanks but ur total is 50, any clearer?


 

Edited by VMX, 07 October 2017 - 12:46 PM.


Corruption_Clan #7 Posted 05 October 2017 - 09:15 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 46045 battles
  • 724
  • Member since:
    11-19-2012
My excuse is i am sick a player but my teams are complete and utter [edited]

DuncaN_101 #8 Posted 05 October 2017 - 09:20 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 53219 battles
  • 1,891
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011
If you lose often enough you'll get there as well really...



SveZauzeto01 #9 Posted 05 October 2017 - 09:20 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 37039 battles
  • 77
  • Member since:
    04-27-2011

View PostCorruption_Clan, on 05 October 2017 - 08:15 PM, said:

My excuse is i am sick a player but my teams are complete and utter [edited]

 

Another with 50, i wish someone with 43 winrate and tier 10 tanks answer my question.

RamRaid90 #10 Posted 05 October 2017 - 09:21 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 21406 battles
  • 6,459
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

View PostSveZauzeto01, on 05 October 2017 - 08:20 PM, said:

 

Another with 50, i wish someone with 43 winrate and tier 10 tanks answer my question.

 

The same reason you suck in your tier Xs, he sucks in all tanks. It's not really that hard to understand.

 



RockyRoller #11 Posted 05 October 2017 - 09:25 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 32230 battles
  • 1,238
  • [NR-NS] NR-NS
  • Member since:
    06-15-2016

Well maybe they were unlucky and played against a lot of teams that had a single player using illegal mods before WG staff caught them? An unfair cheat mod would be more than enough to win a game as YT videos demonstrate and likewise a person throwing a game away by team killing or ramming own team members out of safe sniping zones, likewise an early career not knowing they should buy better than 50%, should spend 1500 credit on upgrades, or use free exp to research every upgrade and buy them before even fighting the first battle?

 

Then we can take into account medical/physical/financial/ages issues, we are all different doing the best on can and everyone gets exp to research and in tiers credits to buy whatever you fancy in time. 

 

Lots of reasons why someone might legitimately have a low score and still be a a decent player, it is the folk with over 50% I feel sorry for as they can never prove they achieved this honestly can they?


Edited by RockyRoller, 05 October 2017 - 09:28 PM.


RamRaid90 #12 Posted 05 October 2017 - 09:27 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 21406 battles
  • 6,459
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

View PostRockyRoller, on 05 October 2017 - 08:25 PM, said:

Well maybe they were unlucky and played against a lot of teams that had a single player using illegal mods before WG staff caught them? An unfair cheat mod would be more than enough to win a game as YT videos demonstrate and likewise a person throwing a game away by team killing or ramming own team members out of safe sniping zones, likewise an early career not knowing they should buy better than 50%, should spend 1500 credit on upgrades, or use free exp to research every upgrade and buy them before even fighting the first battle?

 

Lots of reasons why someone might legitimately have a low score and still be a a decent player, it is the folk with over 50% I feel sorry for as they can never prove they achieved this honestly can they?

 

970 posts...not one of them makes any sense..

 

Just as with monkeys and typewriters though, I suppose one day you'll type something which isnt utter nonsense.



SveZauzeto01 #13 Posted 05 October 2017 - 09:30 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 37039 battles
  • 77
  • Member since:
    04-27-2011

View PostDuncaN_101, on 05 October 2017 - 08:20 PM, said:

If you lose often enough you'll get there as well really...
 

 

I understand that, but tell me what i should do on battlefield to get 43 winrate and there is other 14 random players picked also random. Its not enough to be bad and not contribute anything for my team but i must be so incredible bad that i am working against my team. I understand that someone can be incredible bad with 1k 2k 3k 4k and tier 6 tier 7 as top tanks but how i can be incredibly bad with 10+k games and bunch of T9 and T10 tanks? 

RockyRoller #14 Posted 05 October 2017 - 09:30 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 32230 battles
  • 1,238
  • [NR-NS] NR-NS
  • Member since:
    06-15-2016
never mind one day you might start to understand, but don't expect anyone to care

RamRaid90 #15 Posted 05 October 2017 - 09:34 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 21406 battles
  • 6,459
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

View PostSveZauzeto01, on 05 October 2017 - 08:30 PM, said:

 

I understand that, but tell me what i should do on battlefield to get 43 winrate and there is other 14 random players picked also random. Its not enough to be bad and not contribute anything for my team but i must be so incredible bad that i am working against my team. I understand that someone can be incredible bad with 1k 2k 3k 4k and tier 6 tier 7 as top tanks but how i can be incredibly bad with 10+k games and bunch of T9 and T10 tanks? 

 

If all you played was your BC25t...you would have a 45% overall winrate...do you understand?

zen_monk_ #16 Posted 05 October 2017 - 09:35 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 25307 battles
  • 458
  • Member since:
    05-08-2011

View PostSveZauzeto01, on 05 October 2017 - 08:20 PM, said:

 

Another with 50, i wish someone with 43 winrate and tier 10 tanks answer my question.

 

Clan Wars. He's in a bad/small clan who participate just for kicks and loses every game.

 

If you die your way to Tier 10, you wont have less than 45%.


Edited by zen_monk_, 05 October 2017 - 09:36 PM.


DuncaN_101 #17 Posted 05 October 2017 - 09:36 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 53219 battles
  • 1,891
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011

View PostSveZauzeto01, on 05 October 2017 - 09:30 PM, said:

 

I understand that, but tell me what i should do on battlefield to get 43 winrate and there is other 14 random players picked also random. Its not enough to be bad and not contribute anything for my team but i must be so incredible bad that i am working against my team. I understand that someone can be incredible bad with 1k 2k 3k 4k and tier 6 tier 7 as top tanks but how i can be incredibly bad with 10+k games and bunch of T9 and T10 tanks? 

Care less about the others and more about your own play.

 

And basically if everything is going tits up take as many with you as you can. 



SveZauzeto01 #18 Posted 05 October 2017 - 09:43 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 37039 battles
  • 77
  • Member since:
    04-27-2011

View PostRockyRoller, on 05 October 2017 - 08:25 PM, said:

Well maybe they were unlucky and played against a lot of teams that had a single player using illegal mods before WG staff caught them? An unfair cheat mod would be more than enough to win a game as YT videos demonstrate and likewise a person throwing a game away by team killing or ramming own team members out of safe sniping zones, likewise an early career not knowing they should buy better than 50%, should spend 1500 credit on upgrades, or use free exp to research every upgrade and buy them before even fighting the first battle?

 

Then we can take into account medical/physical/financial/ages issues, we are all different doing the best on can and everyone gets exp to research and in tiers credits to buy whatever you fancy in time. 

 

Lots of reasons why someone might legitimately have a low score and still be a a decent player, it is the folk with over 50% I feel sorry for as they can never prove they achieved this honestly can they?

 

I agree that winrate is not the exact scale of someone skill but i dont talk about 47, 48, even 46 winrate but 43 wirate and not with just few thousants games and low tier tanks. If i enter the game and go afk leaving my tank in the game i will have higher score that 43 i guarantee that. I also agree that there is some theoretical possibilities for T10 tanks and that winrate but i rly want to know is there something other involved in that.
 

View PostDuncaN_101, on 05 October 2017 - 08:36 PM, said:

Care less about the others and more about your own play.

 

And basically if everything is going tits up take as many with you as you can. 

 

Point is not is othars are bad but how someonerly rly bad can have T10 tanks and is there some other rules exist applicable only for some players.
 

Balc0ra #19 Posted 05 October 2017 - 09:51 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 66239 battles
  • 16,231
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View PostSveZauzeto01, on 05 October 2017 - 08:43 PM, said:

Guy for who i asking for is mod and i will not tell his name

 

sure... sure... If he is a "mod"... then he should have the resources to know.

 

Others just play the game without a care in the world. Some are just old and don't have the reflexes others have. I mean I know of several that are close to or over 70 that play WOT. Most of them are in the 45% area and really don't care.  Then you have those that buy a tier 8 prem, rush tiers and stay high. And once you rush and get a 43% WR after a few K games. You improving is not gonna get that to rise as easy.

 

I mean you have multiple tanks with 46% WR on tier 9/10. So you know if you have that WR on those tanks because of bad luck... or because you rushed tiers. So mix that with what I said above... there you have it.



DuncaN_101 #20 Posted 05 October 2017 - 09:52 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 53219 battles
  • 1,891
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011
I don't see why you are so hung up about this


You can buy a T8 prem tank from day one and be shockingly bad in that... Same with tier 10 it just takes time to get there

Seriously be like frozen and let it go man.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users