Jump to content


AMX Cda 105 and accuracy?

AMX Cda 105

  • Please log in to reply
32 replies to this topic

stderr #1 Posted 08 October 2017 - 11:47 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 20887 battles
  • 66
  • Member since:
    02-08-2014
What's wrong with the AMX Cda 105 and its supposed accuracy? It says .29 in the stats, but that's far from the reality in my opinion. It just can't be so. I'd guess it's more like .34-.36... Anyone else that got the same feeling?
 


jack_timber #2 Posted 08 October 2017 - 01:13 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31180 battles
  • 1,604
  • Member since:
    07-26-2014

Maybe a silly question but is your crew at 100%.

 



RamRaid90 #3 Posted 08 October 2017 - 01:14 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 19683 battles
  • 5,855
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

Mine is extremely accurate.

 

Perhaps your crew are not fully trained?



Aikl #4 Posted 08 October 2017 - 01:20 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 25141 battles
  • 4,026
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

If your connection is wonky, guns can seem quite inaccurate. Running Pingplotter is a good idea to figure out if you have a potato router, a cheap ISP, if your house should be searched by the Ghostbusters, if you and/or family is downloading massive amounts of obscene German dwarf videos or if one server is better than the other.

 

For me EU1 is much more stable than EU2, and it's mostly down to the ISP routing EU2 through another node that is pretty potato.



stderr #5 Posted 08 October 2017 - 04:28 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 20887 battles
  • 66
  • Member since:
    02-08-2014
 

View Postjack_timber, on 08 October 2017 - 12:13 PM, said:

Maybe a silly question but is your crew at 100%.

 

 

View PostRamRaid90, on 08 October 2017 - 12:14 PM, said:

Mine is extremely accurate.

 

Perhaps your crew are not fully trained?

 

View PostAikl, on 08 October 2017 - 12:20 PM, said:

If your connection is wonky, guns can seem quite inaccurate. Running Pingplotter is a good idea to figure out if you have a potato router, a cheap ISP, if your house should be searched by the Ghostbusters, if you and/or family is downloading massive amounts of obscene German dwarf videos or if one server is better than the other.

 

For me EU1 is much more stable than EU2, and it's mostly down to the ISP routing EU2 through another node that is pretty potato.

 

Yes, the crew is at 100%. :)

I don't got this problem with other tanks. For instance, the T62A totally crushes this sorry one when it comes to sniping. And I got .31 with it.

 


mortalsatsuma #6 Posted 08 October 2017 - 05:46 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 12657 battles
  • 1,516
  • Member since:
    06-13-2014
As if accuracy is a relevant value in this game :teethhappy:

stderr #7 Posted 08 October 2017 - 07:46 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 20887 battles
  • 66
  • Member since:
    02-08-2014

View Postmortalsatsuma, on 08 October 2017 - 04:46 PM, said:

As if accuracy is a relevant value in this game :teethhappy:

 

Maybe not that much at the low tiers you're playing at? :teethhappy:
 


250swb #8 Posted 09 October 2017 - 08:16 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 20788 battles
  • 4,582
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-23-2015
I have found the gun to be very accurate, one of the best even without significant crew skills.

tajj7 #9 Posted 09 October 2017 - 08:45 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 24362 battles
  • 13,836
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    03-30-2014
By your comment on the T-62A, which has amazing dispersion I'd reckon you are not letting it fully aim. 

Homer_J #10 Posted 09 October 2017 - 08:59 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27072 battles
  • 27,711
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View Poststderr, on 08 October 2017 - 11:47 AM, said:

What's wrong with the AMX Cda 105 and its supposed accuracy? It says .29 in the stats, but that's far from the reality in my opinion. It just can't be so. I'd guess it's more like .34-.36... Anyone else that got the same feeling?
 

 

It may be a silly question but do you have any idea what the accuracy figure means?

stderr #11 Posted 09 October 2017 - 09:10 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 20887 battles
  • 66
  • Member since:
    02-08-2014

View Post250swb, on 09 October 2017 - 07:16 AM, said:

I have found the gun to be very accurate, one of the best even without significant crew skills.

 

 I envy you. :/

 

View Posttajj7, on 09 October 2017 - 07:45 AM, said:

By your comment on the T-62A, which has amazing dispersion I'd reckon you are not letting it fully aim. 

 

  Yes, maybe it was a poor example in this context. But I do. I'm taking my time. Not always off course, but most of the time. I would accept the lousy precision I've seen so far, if I was not.

 

 I don't get it. It must be something with in my head if no one else experiences it. If it wasn't for my stats to prove it. I've currently got 69% percent accuracy with it. With my T-34-2 — which I also play as a sniper — and .36, I've got 74%. Only ~100 games with the AMX though. But there's enough shots in there to get a picture of it.

 

 

 


stderr #12 Posted 09 October 2017 - 09:14 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 20887 battles
  • 66
  • Member since:
    02-08-2014

View PostHomer_J, on 09 October 2017 - 07:59 AM, said:

 

It may be a silly question but do you have any idea what the accuracy figure means?

 

  The lower the value, the more accurate your shots will(should) be.
 
 

Edited by stderr, 09 October 2017 - 09:15 AM.


stderr #13 Posted 09 October 2017 - 10:14 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 20887 battles
  • 66
  • Member since:
    02-08-2014

All-right. I've watched the reviews by QB and DG and it seems to be something serious wrong at my side. Maybe I should check the network after all. They show ridiculous precision with this one, which I haven't been close to. :o

Strange however... I've got server reticle enabled, so latency or anything else shouldn't be a problem. I'm perplexed.

 


Homer_J #14 Posted 09 October 2017 - 01:10 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27072 battles
  • 27,711
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View Poststderr, on 09 October 2017 - 09:14 AM, said:

 

  The lower the value, the more accurate your shots will(should) be.
 
 

 

Yes, but I feel you are missing out on some vital information.  Do you know how that is represented in game, and what the figure measures?

Edited by Homer_J, 09 October 2017 - 01:11 PM.


250swb #15 Posted 09 October 2017 - 01:10 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 20788 battles
  • 4,582
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-23-2015
As far as I'm aware QB doesn't use the server reticle. Neither do I and having seen the same reviews I tend to agree, it is accurate. Maybe try without?

Edited by 250swb, 09 October 2017 - 01:12 PM.


Homer_J #16 Posted 09 October 2017 - 01:12 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27072 battles
  • 27,711
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View Poststderr, on 09 October 2017 - 10:14 AM, said:

 They show ridiculous precision with this one, which I haven't been close to.

 

 

Do you get shots outside the circle?

 

Is the circle bigger than .29 metres at 100m?



unrealname #17 Posted 09 October 2017 - 01:23 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 20275 battles
  • 889
  • Member since:
    10-31-2013
its a french tank what did you expect, lel. But honestly, i have the same problem myself, even though grille has best accuracy in game, even fully aimed shots at longer distance than 200-300 meters seem to miss way too often, best accuracy in game my a$$ so to say, i probably can snapshot with my IS7 better while full speed on the move and turning the turret, because RASHAAA :D

Edited by Bond90, 09 October 2017 - 01:23 PM.


stderr #18 Posted 09 October 2017 - 02:36 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 20887 battles
  • 66
  • Member since:
    02-08-2014

View PostHomer_J, on 09 October 2017 - 12:12 PM, said:

 

Do you get shots outside the circle?

 

Is the circle bigger than .29 metres at 100m?

 

 No. Never outside the circle. But never dead center either. I would guess that shots most often ends up somewhere 15-25% from the center. Agonizing often missing weakspots, hitting the ground or buildings.

 I've never estimated the circle that way. I just got some feeling for/and compare to how other tanks and guns act.

 

 I had the exact problem with the AMX 30. I got it one month before the nerf (or buff, depending on how you see it) and thought WG had secretly systematically nerfed the accuracy more and more until the patch, so it wouldn't make so much of an impact. And that the buff-side coming with the patch was meant to make the transition more of a positive feeling. I had horrible accuracy with it too. 74% hits, as with my T-32-2.

 

 I really hope rewiring my network will do.

 


magkiln #19 Posted 09 October 2017 - 02:49 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 21948 battles
  • 712
  • [EKKE] EKKE
  • Member since:
    09-21-2015
There are more tanks with that problem (Skoda T40, T34 heavy). WG seems to vary the distribution of shots over the aiming circle from one tank to another quite a bit.

Homer_J #20 Posted 09 October 2017 - 02:54 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27072 battles
  • 27,711
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View Poststderr, on 09 October 2017 - 02:36 PM, said:

 

 No. Never outside the circle. But never dead center either. I would guess that shots most often ends up somewhere 15-25% from the center. Agonizing often missing weakspots, hitting the ground or buildings.

 I've never estimated the circle that way. I just got some feeling for/and compare to how other tanks and guns act.

 

 I had the exact problem with the AMX 30. I got it one month before the nerf (or buff, depending on how you see it) and thought WG had secretly systematically nerfed the accuracy more and more until the patch, so it wouldn't make so much of an impact. And that the buff-side coming with the patch was meant to make the transition more of a positive feeling. I had horrible accuracy with it too. 74% hits, as with my T-32-2.

 

 

Sounds like you have the wrong idea how accuracy works in the game or what the figure means.

 

Within the circle every tank has uses the same distribution.  That circle is your accuracy, at 100m it will be 0.29m or whatever it's supposed to be depending on crew training, vents, etc.

 

You aren't supposed to hit dead centre more often with a more accurate gun, you just have a smaller circle.







Also tagged with AMX Cda 105

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users