Jump to content


Is this a new aiming system to help us?


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
8 replies to this topic

____Daddy____ #1 Posted 15 October 2017 - 06:28 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 776 battles
  • 32
  • [EW_YK] EW_YK
  • Member since:
    03-03-2017

Edited.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to violation of the rules.


Edited by Asklepi0s, 16 October 2017 - 09:24 AM.


douglarse #2 Posted 15 October 2017 - 07:45 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 55594 battles
  • 1,003
  • [WHO] WHO
  • Member since:
    11-22-2011

Didn't get the response he wanted in his first thread.

 

Starts another,



UrQuan #3 Posted 15 October 2017 - 07:51 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 19049 battles
  • 5,780
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-19-2011

One thing I don't get about these threads: why not contact a clan officer/diplomat about this? Especially with Dingers, we're quite the visible bunch on the forum & our recruitment thread is very visible (hardly ever leaves page 1)

 

With that said, Dingers don't have any clan obligations outside joining our shared channel. Any mods they use is on their own responsibility & the few Dinger mods that exists are not mandatory. We do warn our clan members from time to time not to use illegal mods as it can get you banned as many of us are casual players who are just online to have fun.

 

I checked the video & tbh, I really need the replay to verify if it's true, because if it's an illegal aim-mod he's using, it's odd it would only be used in the 30 second mark, I rather suspect that from another angle in replay, a part of the tank is visible to click on for auto-aim. Supported as he fails to use this 'cheat aim' in later in situations where it would helped him more.

Edit: Observe the video closely & the red tank highlight is tehre, just hard to see because of how the video got rendered, so perfectly able for vanilla auto-aim to get a lock there; just an awkward view point rendered by the vid.

 

Yes, I copy-pasted this response, as your OP is practically a copy-paste of the other thread.

Do note that opening duplicate threads is a punishable offense on the forums. Not sure what your grief is with this player or Dingers in general that you suddenly start this crusade. Cheating is not something I condone, but neither is (false) naming a shaming for some personal crusade.

Do note that the whole issue with your proof is one single instant of shady auto-aim activation at start, a moment that looks far less shady from another angle, as then the red tank is visible to LRS for auto-aim.

 


Edited by UrQuan, 15 October 2017 - 08:08 PM.


250swb #4 Posted 15 October 2017 - 08:06 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 20769 battles
  • 4,573
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-23-2015
He's been caught out and just trying to spread as much crapas possible in a short time.

K_A #5 Posted 15 October 2017 - 08:07 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 13566 battles
  • 4,656
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    04-18-2013
If you insist on naming and shaming and starting multiple threads on the same subject, basically breaking 3 or 4 forum rules alone with these, at least do it with your real account and don't hide behind your reroll smurf or whatever that's supposed to be.

____Daddy____ #6 Posted 15 October 2017 - 08:20 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 776 battles
  • 32
  • [EW_YK] EW_YK
  • Member since:
    03-03-2017

View PostUrQuan, on 15 October 2017 - 07:51 PM, said:

One thing I don't get about these threads: why not contact a clan officer/diplomat about this? Especially with Dingers, we're quite the visible bunch on the forum & our recruitment thread is very visible (hardly ever leaves page 1)

 

With that said, Dingers don't have any clan obligations outside joining our shared channel. Any mods they use is on their own responsibility & the few Dinger mods that exists are not mandatory. We do warn our clan members from time to time not to use illegal mods as it can get you banned as many of us are casual players who are just online to have fun.

 

I checked the video & tbh, I really need the replay to verify if it's true, because if it's an illegal aim-mod he's using, it's odd it would only be used in the 30 second mark, I rather suspect that from another angle in replay, a part of the tank is visible to click on for auto-aim. Supported as he fails to use this 'cheat aim' in later in situations where it would helped him more.

Edit: Observe the video closely & the red tank highlight is tehre, just hard to see because of how the video got rendered, so perfectly able for vanilla auto-aim to get a lock there; just an awkward view point rendered by the vid.

 

Yes, I copy-pasted this response, as your OP is practically a copy-paste of the other thread.

Do note that opening duplicate threads is a punishable offense on the forums. Not sure what your grief is with this player or Dingers in general that you suddenly start this crusade. Cheating is not something I condone, but neither is (false) naming a shaming for some personal crusade.

Do note that the whole issue with your proof is one single instant of shady auto-aim activation at start, a moment that looks far less shady from another angle, as then the red tank is visible to LRS for auto-aim.

 

hhhhhmmmmmmm, clan member defending a cheater...

 

 

Here its clearer now:

 

look here, he IS locked on prior to to enemy being highlighted...

 

https://imgur.com/gtU1T43

 

33 seconds, exactly....

https://www.youtube....1&v=Ok1JfOW0Sjw

This is the REAL WotReplay machines video, not the video long range sniper made himself, where he muffles the sound of the "ready to fire notification" with a "chow" sound, below.

https://www.youtube....h?v=Phc3KXQNc5o

 

Desperation of a cheater......and his clan mates come here to defend it.

 

 



mrmoff10 #7 Posted 16 October 2017 - 01:37 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 3767 battles
  • 104
  • Member since:
    10-25-2014

View Post____Daddy____, on 15 October 2017 - 08:20 PM, said:

hhhhhmmmmmmm, clan member defending a cheater...

 

 

Here its clearer now:

 

look here, he IS locked on prior to to enemy being highlighted...

 

https://imgur.com/gtU1T43

 

33 seconds, exactly....

https://www.youtube....1&v=Ok1JfOW0Sjw

This is the REAL WotReplay machines video, not the video long range sniper made himself, where he muffles the sound of the "ready to fire notification" with a "chow" sound, below.

https://www.youtube....h?v=Phc3KXQNc5o

 

Desperation of a cheater......and his clan mates come here to defend it.

 

 

 

 

You are wrong.

that is all.



Strappster #8 Posted 16 October 2017 - 01:57 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 23556 battles
  • 8,745
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View Post____Daddy____, on 15 October 2017 - 07:20 PM, said:

hhhhhmmmmmmm, clan member defending a cheater...

 

 

Here its clearer now:

 

look here, he IS locked on prior to to enemy being highlighted...

 

https://imgur.com/gtU1T43

 

33 seconds, exactly....

https://www.youtube....1&v=Ok1JfOW0Sjw

This is the REAL WotReplay machines video, not the video long range sniper made himself, where he muffles the sound of the "ready to fire notification" with a "chow" sound, below.

https://www.youtube....h?v=Phc3KXQNc5o

 

Desperation of a cheater......and his clan mates come here to defend it.

 

How exactly does a still image show that auto-aim is locked on? I'm genuinely curious because you've given us nothing to support your case but your insistence. All the "evidence" you've linked to clearly shows nothing but regular in-game auto-aim being used.

 

You still haven't answered the question of what mods you're running too. Thought I'd mention it in case you've forgotten despite being asked several times by various people in the last thread.



MeetriX #9 Posted 16 October 2017 - 08:09 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 18576 battles
  • 2,436
  • Member since:
    08-12-2012
Vanilla ingame autoaim is no mod. :sceptic:




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users