Jump to content


Why 907 so strong?


  • Please log in to reply
15 replies to this topic

CoDiGGo #1 Posted 15 October 2017 - 06:54 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 14715 battles
  • 554
  • [MOARR] MOARR
  • Member since:
    05-10-2015

why 907, defender and T34-85 M so strong?

 

Note the pattern, KEY sh6, sh8, sh10, cw tanks with uncertain or no more access to get them. I wonder what is behind this...



AdzTownstrike #2 Posted 15 October 2017 - 07:22 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18853 battles
  • 706
  • [S3AL] S3AL
  • Member since:
    05-19-2014
Because they used to be weak. And WG love to overbuff

xtram3x #3 Posted 15 October 2017 - 07:31 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 30757 battles
  • 1,285
  • Member since:
    01-03-2013
We get this topic every few days, do we really need it again?

ogremage #4 Posted 15 October 2017 - 07:36 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31614 battles
  • 1,348
  • [KAZNA] KAZNA
  • Member since:
    06-26-2011
For SH6 T-34-85M isn't bad, but Type 64 and Cromwell / Cromwell B are also viable setups, even when try-harding.
I agree about Defender (a better IS-3) and Obj 907 (a better Obj 140).

It's one thing to mistakenly overbuff some tanks, it's another to then not allow those who didn't have access to them to get them.

Edited by ogremage, 15 October 2017 - 07:37 PM.


K_A #5 Posted 15 October 2017 - 07:36 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 13566 battles
  • 4,656
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    04-18-2013
907 used to be clearly worse then 140, but the HD model perhaps unnecessarily buffed it's armor to edge it ahead of all the tech tree tanks. Defender was just completely stupid to begin with. T-34-85M was complete garbage when it first came out and was clearly worse than both the tech tree T-34-85 and the Rudy version.

MR_FIAT #6 Posted 15 October 2017 - 07:41 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 18460 battles
  • 1,528
  • [_RBP_] _RBP_
  • Member since:
    05-16-2015
because rasha da cyka blyat tronk tenk vodka da.

BassGloves #7 Posted 15 October 2017 - 09:06 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 284 battles
  • 66
  • Member since:
    11-10-2014

Because they are Russian and Wargaming wouldn't know balance if it hit them in the [edited]face with a hammer.

Look at the Foch B for example

War Thunder >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> World of RNG


Edited by BassGloves, 15 October 2017 - 09:07 PM.


Y_O_L_0 #8 Posted 16 October 2017 - 09:41 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18709 battles
  • 885
  • [Z__G] Z__G
  • Member since:
    12-27-2012
The 907 is not strong. It is an underpowered tier 11 tank.

KillingJoker #9 Posted 16 October 2017 - 09:49 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 28958 battles
  • 1,149
  • Member since:
    09-07-2015
Its a Russian prototype... 

Edited by KillingJoker, 16 October 2017 - 09:49 AM.


Hammerhead20 #10 Posted 16 October 2017 - 05:03 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 25252 battles
  • 1,627
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011

it's a Russian tank?

 

It must be "strong", because not a single Russian tank was "weak" or "bad".

 

Deal with it, comrade.



NUKLEAR_SLUG #11 Posted 16 October 2017 - 05:35 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26628 battles
  • 1,618
  • Member since:
    06-13-2015

View PostCoDiGGo, on 15 October 2017 - 06:54 PM, said:

why 907, defender and T34-85 M so strong?

 

Note the pattern, KEY sh6, sh8, sh10, cw tanks with uncertain or no more access to get them. I wonder what is behind this...

 

I'm pretty sure the T34-85M was practically forced on everyone by WG not so very long ago so pretty much everyone should have one who wasn't dead that week.

Private_Pearts #12 Posted 16 October 2017 - 08:59 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 20538 battles
  • 430
  • [WOPR] WOPR
  • Member since:
    02-24-2015

View Postxtram3x, on 15 October 2017 - 07:31 PM, said:

We get this topic every few days, do we really need it again?

 

Has it been a couple of days since the last time? If yes then of course we need it again.

leggasiini #13 Posted 17 October 2017 - 08:29 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 9661 battles
  • 5,811
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

View PostHammerhead20, on 16 October 2017 - 06:03 PM, said:

it's a Russian tank?

 

It must be "strong", because not a single Russian tank was "weak" or "bad".

 

Deal with it, comrade.

 

Object 268

 

Then again, it once was stupidly good so I dont think it counts.

 

 



Bucifel #14 Posted 17 October 2017 - 02:34 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27748 battles
  • 1,373
  • [3NRGY] 3NRGY
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013

View Postxtram3x, on 15 October 2017 - 07:31 PM, said:

We get this topic every few days, do we really need it again?

 

YES !

to show to WG their problems and stupid decisions !

 

but...if you dont want to see those topics...do you really need to read them and respond?

 

and i dont know about 907 now with 140 buffs....but Defender is a f*****g crap


Edited by Bucifel, 17 October 2017 - 02:35 PM.


Jumping_Turtle #15 Posted 17 October 2017 - 03:09 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 58583 battles
  • 5,115
  • [CNUT] CNUT
  • Member since:
    10-15-2013

View Postxtram3x, on 15 October 2017 - 07:31 PM, said:

We get this topic every few days, do we really need it again?

 

until it is nerfed indeed we do.

brumbarr #16 Posted 17 October 2017 - 03:13 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,290
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View Postleggasiini, on 17 October 2017 - 08:29 AM, said:

 

Object 268

 

Then again, it once was stupidly good so I dont think it counts.

 

 

 

T100, 430, IS4, SU12254,SU101,  kv4 kreslavksy, I can go on :)




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users