Jump to content


Update 9.20.1 Release


  • Please log in to reply
934 replies to this topic

Community #1 Posted 17 October 2017 - 03:28 PM

    Sergeant

  • Content Team
  • 0 battles
  • 26,409
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011
Jump in, try out new features and improvements, and let us know what you think.

The full text of the news item

TOLIKZ_ #2 Posted 17 October 2017 - 03:39 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 8757 battles
  • 18
  • [HRBLV] HRBLV
  • Member since:
    12-23-2016
I can finnaly complete TD-15 for Stug IV.
#hype

ellua #3 Posted 17 October 2017 - 03:45 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 1160 battles
  • 555
  • Member since:
    09-29-2011

*
POPULAR

Still no MM enough improvements. Give players more choices how they want play +/- 2 MM is just bad. Also separate arty units for only those who like it.

 



Sharp1903 #4 Posted 17 October 2017 - 03:46 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38455 battles
  • 1,870
  • Member since:
    01-10-2014
Oh nice, Fv4202 is still garbage !!!

JesperM71 #5 Posted 17 October 2017 - 03:50 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 38286 battles
  • 79
  • [AOS_] AOS_
  • Member since:
    03-09-2011
how about better pen for the Type 59 as you said :(

vV_TIO_Vv #6 Posted 17 October 2017 - 03:52 PM

    Corporal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16941 battles
  • 139
  • [-SJA-] -SJA-
  • Member since:
    01-07-2011
Buff the fv4202 and kv5 already!!

Homer_J #7 Posted 17 October 2017 - 03:54 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 29197 battles
  • 30,630
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

For those who can't read the news page.

 

Server down from 01:00 to 09:30 CEST (UTC+2)

That's midnight to 08:30 UK time.



Amun_RA #8 Posted 17 October 2017 - 04:08 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 43240 battles
  • 327
  • Member since:
    09-27-2011
WILL WE BE ABLE TO USE ORDERS EARNED IN CURRENT PERSONAL MISSIONS CAMPAIGN IN THE FUTURE CAMPAIGNS OR FOR SOMETHING ELSE?

WG, please respond if you read this! Thx!

Edited by Amun_RA, 17 October 2017 - 04:12 PM.


430Umad #9 Posted 17 October 2017 - 04:10 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 20738 battles
  • 260
  • [EX-4] EX-4
  • Member since:
    11-30-2016

So you will only be able to do the personal missions of the 260 with tier X vehicles?

 

seriously?



dennez #10 Posted 17 October 2017 - 04:17 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 17396 battles
  • 4,755
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    02-26-2013

T-34-3 HYPE!!!

 

 

Oh wait..  stil shitty 175 pen..



Czesare #11 Posted 17 October 2017 - 04:17 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 8714 battles
  • 8
  • [GIFTD] GIFTD
  • Member since:
    03-18-2016
so now th fv4202 is way worse than the p victoria and centurion 1. why not give it a turret buff? the first buff might have been a bit to mutch but then tone it down a bit not instantly make its turret bad like it was.

Smelly_Cat #12 Posted 17 October 2017 - 04:23 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 22228 battles
  • 466
  • Member since:
    05-06-2011

With regard to reward camo

  1. ​Standard camo give 4% bonus whereas bonus camo only 2% IIRC? What is the point applying the bonus camo apart from bragging?
  2. Do I get compensation in gold for permanent camo applied already?


Hezs #13 Posted 17 October 2017 - 04:24 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 25408 battles
  • 98
  • Member since:
    03-18-2011
Fv4202 got the turret buff, didn't you read the notes?

markje_94 #14 Posted 17 October 2017 - 04:35 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 9851 battles
  • 24
  • Member since:
    07-13-2012

View PostHezs, on 17 October 2017 - 04:24 PM, said:

Fv4202 got the turret buff, didn't you read the notes?

 

Yes, but they said that in the second CT version too. I truly hope it is buffed,  but we will only know tomorrow

 



Hezs #15 Posted 17 October 2017 - 04:38 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 25408 battles
  • 98
  • Member since:
    03-18-2011
Second ct notes were flawed anyway.

domnulrazvan #16 Posted 17 October 2017 - 04:41 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 23872 battles
  • 167
  • [BADD] BADD
  • Member since:
    03-20-2015

View Postdennez, on 17 October 2017 - 04:17 PM, said:

T-34-3 HYPE!!!

 

 

Oh wait..  stil shitty 175 pen..

 

It s enough... Stop raging. 



SM1AK #17 Posted 17 October 2017 - 04:45 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 16393 battles
  • 154
  • [SLOEX] SLOEX
  • Member since:
    09-24-2013
Still no MM fix for being more than 80% bottom tier!!!  THAT'S THE BIGGEST MM ISSUE AND PLAYERS ARE TELLING YOU THAT FOR MONTHS!!! BUT YOU ASSHOLES ARE JUST IGNORING THE PLAYERBASE!!! 

RiflemanThick #18 Posted 17 October 2017 - 04:51 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12978 battles
  • 210
  • [EGYPT] EGYPT
  • Member since:
    10-25-2012

Buff E 100's gun since it plays with Maus and Type 5 heavy now.. 246 pen is very low.

 

Edit: Please stop forcing us to use gold shells, it really [edited]the play experience to me and to many players, I like using Standard shells because I enjoy aiming at weak spots not just right click and left click with gold but when there is no weak spots at all with vehicles from same tier this means the game is fucked up, give Maus and type 5 heavy weak spots like you gave E 100. E 100 is super heavy tank with many weak spots so why not making other super heavies(Maus, Type 5 heavy) with few weak spots infront too?? btw.. E100's angle is not close to how great Maus and type 5 heavy's angle is so how is it fair for such tank(E100) to play with Maus and Type 5 heavy??????????????????????????????????????????????


Edited by RiflemanThick, 18 October 2017 - 12:01 PM.


immortal_sniper1 #19 Posted 17 October 2017 - 04:55 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 15600 battles
  • 264
  • [BL33T] BL33T
  • Member since:
    10-16-2015

3/5/7 mens

7/15 bottom

5/15 mid

3/15 top

but tX can only be top so TVIII will be mostly botttom



Mr_Deo #20 Posted 17 October 2017 - 04:56 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 41925 battles
  • 1,726
  • [ESAF] ESAF
  • Member since:
    01-30-2012

View PostHomer_J, on 17 October 2017 - 02:54 PM, said:

For those who can't read the news page.

 

Server down from 01:00 to 09:30 CEST (UTC+2)

That's midnight to 08:30 UK time.

 

Wow, thanks homer!...

Similar thing happened on WoWP... said server would go down in 6 hours and then half an hour later it just went offline, at least the notes have it correct this time.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users