Jump to content


FV4202's turret


  • Please log in to reply
38 replies to this topic

RiflemanThick #1 Posted 20 October 2017 - 09:55 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 12121 battles
  • 194
  • [EGYPT] EGYPT
  • Member since:
    10-25-2012

Question: Why WG decided to decrease the turret armor of FV4202 while Centurion and Victoria has better DPM,Speed,Armor,HP,View range,More shells,better velocity, So what FV4202 has over Cen and Victoria?

I was planning in buying FV4202 but what WG did annoyed me a lot :(

 

Why decrease the armor of FV4202 while the Regular tank and other premium tank have a lot better turret armor and other stuff mentioned above????????



qpranger #2 Posted 20 October 2017 - 10:01 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 30697 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013
Because that is how the dice rolled.

Sfinski #3 Posted 20 October 2017 - 10:03 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 29704 battles
  • 1,988
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013
Because they are greedy bastards. Most of the players didn't pay for the tank so it can't be as good as the rest prems. 

RiflemanThick #4 Posted 21 October 2017 - 03:44 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 12121 battles
  • 194
  • [EGYPT] EGYPT
  • Member since:
    10-25-2012

bumP

more opinions?



TsundereWaffle #5 Posted 21 October 2017 - 03:45 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 25812 battles
  • 10,734
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    03-31-2013
Because WG is incapable of balancing tanks

Derethim #6 Posted 21 October 2017 - 03:45 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 16426 battles
  • 1,717
  • Member since:
    04-03-2012

View PostSfinski, on 20 October 2017 - 10:03 PM, said:

Because they are greedy bastards. Most of the players didn't pay for the tank so it can't be as good as the rest prems. 

 

Agreed.

Comrade_Renamon #7 Posted 21 October 2017 - 03:55 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 9434 battles
  • 802
  • Member since:
    09-27-2011
Because it is not a heavy.

FluffyRedFox #8 Posted 21 October 2017 - 04:02 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 21564 battles
  • 7,691
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    12-05-2012
Because people bitched and whined that the buffed FV4202 would be OP, when in reality it'd still be a shitty Primo Victoria

DangerMouse #9 Posted 21 October 2017 - 04:03 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 24236 battles
  • 540
  • [FLOG] FLOG
  • Member since:
    10-28-2010

Because its a cheap Tier 8, if you want he decent one, the PV then open your wallet next time WG put it up for sale, #PTW

 

DM



Search_Warrant #10 Posted 21 October 2017 - 05:37 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 25976 battles
  • 5,287
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011

View PostDangerMouse, on 21 October 2017 - 03:03 PM, said:

Because its a cheap Tier 8, if you want he decent one, the PV then open your wallet next time WG put it up for sale, #PTW

 

DM

 

T-34-3 should be the best tier 8 med in game then right? as its most expensive.

RiflemanThick #11 Posted 21 October 2017 - 06:24 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 12121 battles
  • 194
  • [EGYPT] EGYPT
  • Member since:
    10-25-2012

View PostComrade_Renamon, on 21 October 2017 - 04:55 PM, said:

Because it is not a heavy.

 

What about Centurion and Victoria?

Userext #12 Posted 21 October 2017 - 06:30 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 16259 battles
  • 897
  • Member since:
    06-12-2011
I'm actually glad they didn't buff the turret so much because now maybe we can get its gun buffed. It'd be different to centurion and pvictoria and it'd receive much needed buff to its gun.

Comrade_Renamon #13 Posted 21 October 2017 - 06:37 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 9434 battles
  • 802
  • Member since:
    09-27-2011

View PostRiflemanThick, on 21 October 2017 - 05:24 PM, said:

 

What about Centurion and Victoria?

 

The joke really missed the point, was meaning to point out that WG has no problem buffing heavies to be absolutely nuts. They said it would have been OP with the turret buff, but the defender is fine apparently, not sure I agree with that. If they would have left the turret buff and dropped the hull buff it would have been fine.



AliceUnchained #14 Posted 21 October 2017 - 08:51 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 37820 battles
  • 8,520
  • [322] 322
  • Member since:
    10-18-2011

View PostUserext, on 21 October 2017 - 06:30 PM, said:

I'm actually glad they didn't buff the turret so much because now maybe we can get its gun buffed. It'd be different to centurion and pvictoria and it'd receive much needed buff to its gun.

 

If Wargaming developers (and balancing department) had any working brain matter, they would have considered and introduced a gun handling buff straight away. As the British now had their buff round, really don't count on any gun handling buff any time soon (or ever).

Bucifel #15 Posted 21 October 2017 - 09:28 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27727 battles
  • 1,373
  • [3NRGY] 3NRGY
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013
because FV its available for Gold, not only for Money...and WOT is more and more P2W

commer #16 Posted 21 October 2017 - 10:10 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38080 battles
  • 1,995
  • Member since:
    06-14-2011

View PostBucifel, on 21 October 2017 - 09:28 PM, said:

because FV its available for Gold, not only for Money...and WOT is more and more P2W

 

That's some shitty logic given Lowe is available for gold and it's one of the top3 prem tanks available in the game. 

truoste #17 Posted 21 October 2017 - 10:26 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 36465 battles
  • 1,282
  • Member since:
    08-20-2013

View PostRiflemanThick, on 20 October 2017 - 08:55 PM, said:

Question: Why WG decided to decrease the turret armor of FV4202 while Centurion and Victoria has better DPM,Speed,Armor,HP,View range,More shells,better velocity, So what FV4202 has over Cen and Victoria?

I was planning in buying FV4202 but what WG did annoyed me a lot :(

 

Why decrease the armor of FV4202 while the Regular tank and other premium tank have a lot better turret armor and other stuff mentioned above????????

 

I think the real question is why are you even considering buying tier 8 premium when you know that majority of your games are going to be bottom tier. Much fun against Mice and Types and what not? Want to grind credits? Git gut and do it with regular tier 9s.

5everin #18 Posted 21 October 2017 - 11:58 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 78396 battles
  • 1,613
  • [TEC] TEC
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011

View PostComrade_Renamon, on 21 October 2017 - 06:37 PM, said:

 

The joke really missed the point, was meaning to point out that WG has no problem buffing heavies to be absolutely nuts. They said it would have been OP with the turret buff, but the defender is fine apparently, not sure I agree with that. If they would have left the turret buff and dropped the hull buff it would have been fine.

 

Apparantly they have recently sproughted a conscience over that particluar crappy stunt so the Fv  stays weak in comparison to the abominations they have been churning out recently. They are now off to try another one instead, stay tuned.

Edited by 5everin, 22 October 2017 - 12:00 AM.


RiflemanThick #19 Posted 21 October 2017 - 11:58 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 12121 battles
  • 194
  • [EGYPT] EGYPT
  • Member since:
    10-25-2012

View Posttruoste, on 21 October 2017 - 11:26 PM, said:

 

I think the real question is why are you even considering buying tier 8 premium when you know that majority of your games are going to be bottom tier. Much fun against Mice and Types and what not? Want to grind credits? Git gut and do it with regular tier 9s.

 

Tier 9 rarly gives me above 10k(I used standard account) and I rarly lose money except with Emil 2 I lost credits with this tank more than other Tier 9. There is no regular tank can make you same amount of credits as premium t8.

I already have M4A1 rev and it is making me very good credits only when playing as Sniper, I played over 1k battles with it and It start to get boring so I wanted to use ''trade'' to get FV4202 but turret looks weaker than smiliar tanks and I just wanna know why..



commer #20 Posted 22 October 2017 - 12:26 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38080 battles
  • 1,995
  • Member since:
    06-14-2011

View Posttruoste, on 21 October 2017 - 10:26 PM, said:

 

I think the real question is why are you even considering buying tier 8 premium when you know that majority of your games are going to be bottom tier. Much fun against Mice and Types and what not? Want to grind credits? Git gut and do it with regular tier 9s.

 

tier8s grind more credits, WAY more than t9's. Get real.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users