Jump to content


14.05.2016 - Today --- 76827 Battles


  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

JaffaStar #1 Posted 22 October 2017 - 10:59 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 44590 battles
  • 275
  • Member since:
    04-25-2011

So  , ppl are not using bot s .. well .. then those who say that please explian this ... 

in 527 days one account have already 76827 battles , what means that each day , every day from that account something had played 145 battles ... real explanations ??? 

i have the name as well , but you know .. naming and shaming ... 

WN8 of 208 .. 

and PR of 2123 



Balc0ra #2 Posted 22 October 2017 - 11:24 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 62749 battles
  • 14,361
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

Well depends on what kind of bots. The old pathway bot and idle in base bot that we did see at least one of in every game 4-5 years ago, I've not seen in years since they added the zero XP idle penalty, or the self destruct penalty that caused them to die out. As they gained nothing from using it. So no most bots are just... bad players more so then anything that are passive for way to long. As I've seen active players with less WN8 then that. Most bots back in the day had less then 10 Eff, or more or less zero WN8. 200+ means you at least shot something now and then.

 

527 battles in 76827 days? That's 149 battles each day, and about 6 battles an hour. Considering how most complain about 15-0 wins in 3 mins. That won't take long. Heck most streamers do 50 ish battles in 8 hours. As in 5-6 battles an hour on average. Then again I suspect it's a shared account. And you would be amazed on how many of those there are around that have 4-5 players on one account, online 24/7, either with low or high WN8. The one most know of is EvilJoe, with close to 200K battles atm. As he is online 24/7 and have done more then 150 battles most days. 


Edited by Balc0ra, 22 October 2017 - 11:26 PM.


JaffaStar #3 Posted 22 October 2017 - 11:33 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 44590 battles
  • 275
  • Member since:
    04-25-2011

to share an account means permaban ... am i right ???

if it is not a shared account and that one is not using bot but he is playing that much time ... like around 20 - 24 hours / day ... that means that one is in very great danger of dieing of exhaustion ... so in any way that should be taken some measures ... but hey ... this is wot and anything is possible ...



zen_monk_ #4 Posted 23 October 2017 - 12:29 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 25307 battles
  • 457
  • Member since:
    05-08-2011

Public account in a gaming arcade.

 

Nothing new.

 

 



STLR #5 Posted 23 October 2017 - 08:36 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 30091 battles
  • 721
  • Member since:
    06-07-2013

View PostBalc0ra, on 22 October 2017 - 11:24 PM, said:

Well depends on what kind of bots. The old pathway bot and idle in base bot that we did see at least one of in every game 4-5 years ago, I've not seen in years since they added the zero XP idle penalty, or the self destruct penalty that caused them to die out. As they gained nothing from using it. So no most bots are just... bad players more so then anything that are passive for way to long. As I've seen active players with less WN8 then that. Most bots back in the day had less then 10 Eff, or more or less zero WN8. 200+ means you at least shot something now and then.

 

527 battles in 76827 days? That's 149 battles each day, and about 6 battles an hour. Considering how most complain about 15-0 wins in 3 mins. That won't take long. Heck most streamers do 50 ish battles in 8 hours. As in 5-6 battles an hour on average. Then again I suspect it's a shared account. And you would be amazed on how many of those there are around that have 4-5 players on one account, online 24/7, either with low or high WN8. The one most know of is EvilJoe, with close to 200K battles atm. As he is online 24/7 and have done more then 150 battles most days. 

 

Yes, EvilJoe is an old and consistent one :)) used to be top 1 for years... until the system references were updated with new parameters on which the number of battles doesn't really matter that much.. back then in 2013 when i started he had like 40k battles ..

qpranger #6 Posted 23 October 2017 - 08:40 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 30697 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013

Edited by qpranger, 23 October 2017 - 08:47 AM.


Kozzy #7 Posted 23 October 2017 - 08:44 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 38497 battles
  • 2,288
  • [EAB2] EAB2
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011
Bots in F2P game shock.  Also, this just in water is wet etc etc...

Homer_J #8 Posted 23 October 2017 - 09:01 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27001 battles
  • 27,652
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostJaffaStar, on 22 October 2017 - 11:33 PM, said:

to share an account means permaban ... am i right ???

 

Nope.

 

At least not in practice.



Jumping_Turtle #9 Posted 23 October 2017 - 09:32 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 58563 battles
  • 5,113
  • [CNUT] CNUT
  • Member since:
    10-15-2013

View PostHomer_J, on 23 October 2017 - 09:01 AM, said:

Nope.

 

At least not in practice.

 

It's even allowed. Just do not hope for any help from wg when something goes wrong with the acount a wg staff once said on the forum.



Homer_J #10 Posted 23 October 2017 - 09:44 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27001 battles
  • 27,652
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostJumping_Turtle, on 23 October 2017 - 09:32 AM, said:

 

It's even allowed. Just do not hope for any help from wg when something goes wrong with the acount a wg staff once said on the forum.

 

Indeed, just had a trawl through the game rules/EULA/TOS and there is a vague rule about not allowing anyone to know your password and that you are responsible for anything which happens if you allow someone else to use your account but as long as you keep control of the account there is nothing saying you can't let someone else play on it.



Bennie182 #11 Posted 23 October 2017 - 10:27 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 50351 battles
  • 1,090
  • Member since:
    03-13-2012

View PostJaffaStar, on 22 October 2017 - 10:59 PM, said:

So  , ppl are not using bot s .. well .. then those who say that please explian this ... 

in 527 days one account have already 76827 battles , what means that each day , every day from that account something had played 145 battles ... real explanations ??? 

i have the name as well , but you know .. naming and shaming ... 

WN8 of 208 .. 

and PR of 2123 

so what's the use of this topic?



tajj7 #12 Posted 23 October 2017 - 11:18 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 24356 battles
  • 13,836
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    03-30-2014

View PostJumping_Turtle, on 23 October 2017 - 08:32 AM, said:

 

It's even allowed. Just do not hope for any help from wg when something goes wrong with the acount a wg staff once said on the forum.

 

Pretty sure Anfield streams using accounts that clearly aren't his and IIRC he's a CC so there can't be any issue over it. 




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users