Jump to content


Romanian Tech Tree .. what say you!?

romanian tech tree

  • Please log in to reply
68 replies to this topic

DuncaN_101 #41 Posted 30 April 2018 - 07:12 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 53226 battles
  • 1,897
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011
Yeah how about no.
No thanks

Bulldog_Drummond #42 Posted 30 April 2018 - 10:14 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 29446 battles
  • 9,786
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    08-10-2014

View Postredblast, on 23 October 2017 - 09:58 AM, said:

What do you think about the picture!? 

You want a Romanian Tech Tree!?

 

More informations here: https://thearmoredpa...ree-wip-and-qa/

 

Oh, I've been waiting for this moment

 



Browarszky #43 Posted 30 April 2018 - 10:31 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 16096 battles
  • 3,737
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013

View PostBulldog_Drummond, on 30 April 2018 - 09:14 PM, said:

 

Oh, I've been waiting for this moment

 

 

Now's your chance to learn an easy word of Romanian: 'Da'.

Bulldog_Drummond #44 Posted 30 April 2018 - 10:42 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 29446 battles
  • 9,786
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    08-10-2014

View PostBrowarszky, on 30 April 2018 - 09:31 PM, said:

 

Now's your chance to learn an easy word of Romanian: 'Da'.

 

I did have some Yugoslav/Serbian GFs  over the years who said da da da a lot

 

Never knew what it meant.



ares354 #45 Posted 30 April 2018 - 10:45 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Beta Tester
  • 73803 battles
  • 3,224
  • Member since:
    12-05-2010
Fine by me. Ofc if we get copy paste Centurion it's fine. Copy paste of different nation is bad. 

Gardar7 #46 Posted 30 April 2018 - 11:32 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22857 battles
  • 1,645
  • [VKG-] VKG-
  • Member since:
    05-07-2011
Zrínyi in the Romanian tech tree? You are so wrong...

TungstenHitman #47 Posted 30 April 2018 - 11:37 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 22218 battles
  • 4,073
  • Member since:
    08-28-2016

I'd have nothing against any new nation as such, so long as it adds a little variety and difference in playstlye to the tanks that already exist which must be nigh on impossible at this stage since there are only so many combinations of stats available that doesn't end up just repeating the exact same stats as another tank.

 

Also, no more Russian derived "nations" pls, there are enough T-34, SU, IS and Obj derived foreign tanks in the game as it is, gets a bit pointless just to satisfy players from a particular country tbh. The Italian line with the new semi autoloader looks interesting and at least is a totally new approach and addition to the game much like the addition of the siege mode Swedes and these offer a new playstyle and fresh experience without ruining the game so something fresh and balanced like that, ya I can go along with that if that's what the Romanian tech tree would bring or any new line or nation would bring.



Browarszky #48 Posted 30 April 2018 - 11:39 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 16096 battles
  • 3,737
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013

View PostGardar7, on 30 April 2018 - 10:32 PM, said:

Zrínyi in the Romanian tech tree? You are so wrong...

 

​Seems the Romanians did not bother to put in the proper paper work before making good use of them... :B

ares354 #49 Posted 30 April 2018 - 11:47 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Beta Tester
  • 73803 battles
  • 3,224
  • Member since:
    12-05-2010

View PostTungstenHitman, on 30 April 2018 - 11:37 PM, said:

I'd have nothing against any new nation as such, so long as it adds a little variety and difference in playstlye to the tanks that already exist which must be nigh on impossible at this stage since there are only so many combinations of stats available that doesn't end up just repeating the exact same stats as another tank.

 

Also, no more Russian derived "nations" pls, there are enough T-34, SU, IS and Obj derived foreign tanks in the game as it is, gets a bit pointless just to satisfy players from a particular country tbh. The Italian line with the new semi autoloader looks interesting and at least is a totally new approach and addition to the game much like the addition of the siege mode Swedes and these offer a new playstyle and fresh experience without ruining the game so something fresh and balanced like that, ya I can go along with that if that's what the Romanian tech tree would bring or any new line or nation would bring.

 

Yes, more Shermans and Centurions is what we need, those are fine. 

Italian give us fake-ish Panther, German Leopard prototype and made up top. What a refresh. 

Bulldog_Drummond #50 Posted 30 April 2018 - 11:50 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 29446 battles
  • 9,786
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    08-10-2014

View Postares354, on 30 April 2018 - 10:47 PM, said:

 

Yes, more Shermans and Centurions is what we need, those are fine. 

Italian give us fake-ish Panther, German Leopard prototype and made up top. What a refresh. 

 

What we really need are more 47mm and 17lbr.

TungstenHitman #51 Posted 30 April 2018 - 11:58 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 22218 battles
  • 4,073
  • Member since:
    08-28-2016

View PostBulldog_Drummond, on 30 April 2018 - 10:50 PM, said:

 

What we really need are more 47mm and 17lbr.

 

WG should make another nation featuring Japanese super heavies. More varieties of the Type4 and 5 and O-ni etc, the games crying out for it only they should have more frontal armor, less rear armor where you can't get to anyway, oh and more alpha per shot since the current Japanese offerings require far too much skill.

Bulldog_Drummond #52 Posted 01 May 2018 - 12:01 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 29446 battles
  • 9,786
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    08-10-2014

View PostTungstenHitman, on 30 April 2018 - 10:58 PM, said:

 

WG should make another nation featuring Japanese super heavies. More varieties of the Type4 and 5 and O-ni etc, the games crying out for it only they should have more frontal armor, less rear armor where you can't get to anyway, oh and more alpha per shot since the current Japanese offerings require far too much skill.

 

It is not impossible that the putative Italian and Rumanian super-heavies might fill this much needed gap.

 

 



shikaka9 #53 Posted 01 May 2018 - 06:10 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 60107 battles
  • 166
  • Member since:
    02-27-2013
no way, because all tanks afk , the crew,  all in prison :trollface:

Edited by shikaka9, 01 May 2018 - 06:10 PM.


The_Skull_Killer #54 Posted 13 May 2018 - 07:55 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 1717 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    12-03-2015
The Romanians have most tanks : R-1, FT-17, R-2, R-3, T-3 (pz III), T-4 (pz IV), Hetzer, jgdpzIV, pz 35 t, pz 38 t, AH-IV, T-72, T-72M, TR-85, TR-85M Bizonul, TR-85M1, TR-580, TR-77, TR-77/580, TR-125, P-125, T-5 Panther, BMT-72, T-34, T-34-85, SD-100, Hummel TD, Tacam R-1, Tacam R-2, Tacam T-38, TR B2-4, TR-800, TR-55, TR-55A, TR-55AM, TR-55AM2, TR-55AM2B, TR-55M, and more...Wot Romanian Tech Tree (part 2).png

Browarszky #55 Posted 13 May 2018 - 08:42 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 16096 battles
  • 3,737
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013

View PostThe_Skull_Killer, on 13 May 2018 - 06:55 PM, said:

The Romanians have most tanks : R-1, FT-17, R-2, R-3, T-3 (pz III), T-4 (pz IV), Hetzer, jgdpzIV, pz 35 t, pz 38 t, AH-IV, T-72, T-72M, TR-85, TR-85M Bizonul, TR-85M1, TR-580, TR-77, TR-77/580, TR-125, P-125, T-5 Panther, BMT-72, T-34, T-34-85, SD-100, Hummel TD, Tacam R-1, Tacam R-2, Tacam T-38, TR B2-4, TR-800, TR-55, TR-55A, TR-55AM, TR-55AM2, TR-55AM2B, TR-55M, and more...Wot Romanian Tech Tree (part 2).png

 

So.. basically all WG would have needed to do was to create the Romanian tech tree and be done with it?

evilchaosmonkey #56 Posted 13 May 2018 - 08:43 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 16655 battles
  • 1,756
  • [EIGHT] EIGHT
  • Member since:
    05-04-2013

View PostBulldog_Drummond, on 30 April 2018 - 09:42 PM, said:

 

I did have some Yugoslav/Serbian GFs  over the years who said da da da a lot

 

Never knew what it meant.

 

Afraid to bust your bubble old bean, suspect they were just singing this.....

 



lnfernaI #57 Posted 13 May 2018 - 08:58 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 28906 battles
  • 3,652
  • [ALLGE] ALLGE
  • Member since:
    09-15-2012

what,we need more tanks that resemble USSR?

Is China, Poland and some others not enough for you?



Bulldog_Drummond #58 Posted 13 May 2018 - 09:26 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 29446 battles
  • 9,786
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    08-10-2014

View Postevilchaosmonkey, on 13 May 2018 - 07:43 PM, said:

 

Afraid to bust your bubble old bean, suspect they were just singing this.....

 

 

On the basis of Google Translate I will offer an alternative for Da Da.  Note the bulldog on the swimsuit, Sabrina and I are old and close friends.

 


Edited by Bulldog_Drummond, 13 May 2018 - 09:32 PM.


TheOddRogue #59 Posted 13 May 2018 - 09:45 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 9988 battles
  • 448
  • Member since:
    08-08-2012

What the [edited]is next, Ethiopian tech tree? Enough with tech trees of obscure countries. 

 

Fix all the [edited]existing tanks first. 



Bulldog_Drummond #60 Posted 13 May 2018 - 09:52 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 29446 battles
  • 9,786
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    08-10-2014

View PostTheOddRogue, on 13 May 2018 - 08:45 PM, said:

What the [edited]is next, Ethiopian tech tree? Enough with tech trees of obscure countries. 

 

Fix all the [edited]existing tanks first. 

 

Obscure?  Someone mentioned the other day that Romania had the 4th largest army in WW2.  And defended his position.  Not very effectively, but he had a go.

 

Read the Forum long enough and you will garner many unusual facts

 







Also tagged with romanian tech tree

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users