Jump to content


WG Matchmaking (the place where everyone is spamming at you "autist")

MM Why Wargaming

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
15 replies to this topic

Poll: Question to the developers. (23 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

What World of Tanks need in future?

  1. More overpowered premium tanks! (18 votes [9.63%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 9.63%

  2. More overpowered tech branches! (16 votes [8.56%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 8.56%

  3. On all maps more spots to boost and climb the gray area! (17 votes [9.09%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 9.09%

  4. Nerf all old tanks in the game! (15 votes [8.02%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 8.02%

  5. Make all maps more linear and corridor like! (16 votes [8.56%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 8.56%

  6. Make the MM with +4 tiers difference. (14 votes [7.49%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 7.49%

  7. Make the MM with +5 tiers difference... (15 votes [8.02%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 8.02%

  8. Make the platoons to be played only by yourself. (14 votes [7.49%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 7.49%

  9. Just shut off the MM at this point. (14 votes [7.49%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 7.49%

  10. Make the progress in the game even more slower! (17 votes [9.09%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 9.09%

  11. Then add another 300 tanks on the nations tech trees! (16 votes [8.56%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 8.56%

  12. Make Wargaming great again! (15 votes [8.02%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 8.02%

Vote Hide poll

TzarBuba #1 Posted 25 October 2017 - 06:44 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 36927 battles
  • 11
  • Member since:
    06-26-2011
Matchmaking is completely broken. I'm the first one that openly speaks about this. Wargaming are incapable of creating fair matchmaking. There's not even a single matchmaking complain in the forum. Don't know why I'm the first one complaining. The current state of World of Tanks is unplayable. Developers are lollygagging and not reading the forums or they choose to ignore it. The worst response to game community. At this point you need to make a video and talk about the reasons for this dumb MM implemented in the game. I'm speaking to you game devs. This game will be dead soon. Are you aware of this? I want my voice to be heard, so I will cry everyday. Many tears everyday for the next 200 years. For more information you can check my first post, I think there I solve the problem.

Edited by TzarBuba, 25 October 2017 - 06:47 PM.


Velvet_Underground #2 Posted 25 October 2017 - 06:48 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 22243 battles
  • 3,188
  • Member since:
    12-19-2014
Cowbell, this game definitely needs more cowbell.

unhappy_bunny #3 Posted 25 October 2017 - 06:51 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 18113 battles
  • 2,674
  • [-OC-] -OC-
  • Member since:
    08-01-2012

View PostTzarBuba, on 25 October 2017 - 06:44 PM, said:

Matchmaking is completely broken. No its not. I'm the first one that openly speaks about this. No you are not. Wargaming are incapable of creating fair matchmaking. There's not even a single matchmaking complain in the forum. Don't know why I'm the first one complaining. The current state of World of Tanks is unplayable. Developers are lollygagging and not reading the forums or they choose to ignore it. The worst response to game community. At this point you need to make a video and talk about the reasons for this dumb MM implemented in the game. I'm speaking to you game devs. This game will be dead soon. Are you aware of this? I want my voice to be heard, so I will cry everyday. Many tears everyday for the next 200 years. For more information you can check my first post, I think there I solve the problem.

 

Started to respond, then realise you are just a poor troll. Goodbye.



lord_chipmonk #4 Posted 25 October 2017 - 06:58 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 33952 battles
  • 10,251
  • [-HOW-] -HOW-
  • Member since:
    12-23-2012

View PostTzarBuba, on 25 October 2017 - 06:44 PM, said:

Matchmaking is completely broken. I'm the first one that openly speaks about this. 

 

I stopped here. No point reading further. 



BravelyRanAway #5 Posted 25 October 2017 - 07:06 PM

    General

  • Beta Tester
  • 22556 battles
  • 9,327
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    12-29-2010
I love ticking boxes.......so I ticked them all.:trollface:

TzarBuba #6 Posted 25 October 2017 - 07:10 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 36927 battles
  • 11
  • Member since:
    06-26-2011

View PostVelvet_Underground, on 25 October 2017 - 05:48 PM, said:

Cowbell, this game definitely needs more cowbell.

 

I have the same fever
 

View Postunhappy_bunny, on 25 October 2017 - 05:51 PM, said:

 

Started to respond, then realise you are just a poor troll. Goodbye.

 

Nope I'm interested to see what you have to say, really you need to check my first post I'm dead serious there.
 

View Postlord_chipmonk, on 25 October 2017 - 05:58 PM, said:

 

I stopped here. No point reading further. 

 

I'm fine with your choices
 

View PostBravelyRanAway, on 25 October 2017 - 06:06 PM, said:

I love ticking boxes.......so I ticked them all.:trollface:

 

My man
 

I_Gutmensch_Deluxe_I #7 Posted 25 October 2017 - 07:17 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 16960 battles
  • 200
  • Member since:
    09-20-2013
Just remove Arta

TzarBuba #8 Posted 25 October 2017 - 07:22 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 36927 battles
  • 11
  • Member since:
    06-26-2011

View PostI_Gutmensch_Deluxe_I, on 25 October 2017 - 06:17 PM, said:

Just remove Arta

 

I don't think this is the correct approaching way for them. Arteries are important for the game. For me personally I think they need to have new limitations. No more than one arty per team.

Homer_J #9 Posted 25 October 2017 - 07:51 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 28729 battles
  • 30,030
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

On that last option you spelled Artillery wrong.

 

#MAGA



DuncaN_101 #10 Posted 25 October 2017 - 07:56 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 53226 battles
  • 1,892
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011
I voted all except the last one... What's my prize?

gilly136 #11 Posted 25 October 2017 - 07:56 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 13222 battles
  • 62
  • Member since:
    04-14-2015

View PostVelvet_Underground, on 25 October 2017 - 06:48 PM, said:

Cowbell, this game definitely needs more cowbell.

 

i have a fever and the prescription is more cowbell baby

TzarBuba #12 Posted 25 October 2017 - 07:57 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 36927 battles
  • 11
  • Member since:
    06-26-2011

View PostHomer_J, on 25 October 2017 - 06:51 PM, said:

On that last option you spelled Artillery wrong.

 

#MAGA

 

k
 

View PostDuncaN_101, on 25 October 2017 - 06:56 PM, said:

I voted all except the last one... What's my prize?

 

I don't know WG have to ban you now, I guess
 

Tidal_Force #13 Posted 25 October 2017 - 08:22 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 16192 battles
  • 6,839
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    08-29-2012

View PostTzarBuba, on 25 October 2017 - 06:22 PM, said:

 

I don't think this is the correct approaching way for them. Arteries are important for the game. For me personally I think they need to have new limitations. No more than one arty per team.

 

Of course it is.

#REMOVE_ARTY_FROM_THE_GAME



Aikl #14 Posted 25 October 2017 - 08:49 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 25547 battles
  • 4,349
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

View PostTzarBuba, on 25 October 2017 - 06:16 PM, said:

 

Nope I'm interested to see what you have to say, really you need to check my first post I'm dead serious there.

 

While I'm all for topics complaining about game features, you do a rather poor job at appearing 'dead serious'.

 

View PostTzarBuba, on 25 October 2017 - 05:44 PM, said:

Matchmaking is completely broken.(...)
 

 

It's crap, but ok. Call it what you want to.

 

View PostTzarBuba, on 25 October 2017 - 05:44 PM, said:

 I'm the first one that openly speaks about this.

 

Hahahaha.

 

View PostTzarBuba, on 25 October 2017 - 05:44 PM, said:

Wargaming are incapable of creating fair matchmaking. 

 

Everything is not supposed to be fair, and while roflstomp matches aren't much fun, they are not a major problem. At least the match tends to be over quickly. Beats many other problems that creates fifteen-minute long Mexican standoffs.

 

View PostTzarBuba, on 25 October 2017 - 05:44 PM, said:

 There's not even a single matchmaking complain in the forum.

 

Pigs can fly, yes.

 

View PostTzarBuba, on 25 October 2017 - 05:44 PM, said:

Don't know why I'm the first one complaining.
 

 

You might not be the first,

But you're easily one of the worst

I believe this to be true

So please seal your lips with glue

 

View PostTzarBuba, on 25 October 2017 - 05:44 PM, said:

 The current state of World of Tanks is unplayable.

 

This is not even worth commenting on.

 

View PostTzarBuba, on 25 October 2017 - 05:44 PM, said:

Developers are lollygagging and not reading the forums or they choose to ignore it. 

 

Well, most of this forum is pure crap, and would be a horrible source for feedback. It's true for general EU community relations, however.

 

View PostTzarBuba, on 25 October 2017 - 05:44 PM, said:

 At this point you need to make a video and talk about the reasons for this dumb MM implemented in the game. 
 

 

Many players actually like it. I don't. I think that three top tier tanks is a horrible idea with a +/-2MM, and it's even extremely boring to be on the top three.

 

I've tried polling the forums. Most are above-average players. The ones that "shouldn't" like this setup. Many don't, but they apparently think the main stated benefit of 3-5-7 (easier to be bottom tier) is good. It's thus a fine reason on its own. It works terribly in practice, because of other reasons, but still. Can't complain about everything.

 

Did you know that matchmaking used to be literally +4/5? years ago? Dead serious. No premium ammo either. Have fun with StuG III against IS-7! :D

 

View PostTzarBuba, on 25 October 2017 - 05:44 PM, said:

 I'm speaking to you game devs. This game will be dead soon. Are you aware of this?

 

Most likely it'll live for long enough even the way it's going nowadays. Driving tanks is a really good idea, so it'll take time to die. Might not be much fun in the end, though. It seldom is when you have 15vs15 camping tanks; which is kind of where this meta is going.

 

View PostTzarBuba, on 25 October 2017 - 05:44 PM, said:

I want my voice to be heard, so I will cry everyday. Many tears everyday for the next 200 years. For more information you can check my first post, I think there I solve the problem.
 

 

Spoiler

 

Seriously, accept that the game is going where WG wants, and use your (seemingly limited) abilities to complain about things we might be able to influence. Like the lack of interaction with WGEU on the forums, or the fact that a WG event in Bucharest, occupying three employees, seemingly renders the EU Community team without resources to respond to what amounted to a PR shitstorm.

 

 

View PostBravelyRanAway, on 25 October 2017 - 06:06 PM, said:

I love ticking boxes.......so I ticked them all.:trollface:

 

It must be done, even if this had been an interesting topic with a relevant poll and a well-written argument for improving matchmaking.

Edited by Aikl, 25 October 2017 - 08:50 PM.


Fighto #15 Posted 25 October 2017 - 10:28 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 35139 battles
  • 908
  • [TAC] TAC
  • Member since:
    02-09-2011
U missed the WG fire extinguishers , a snip at 100€.

Jbnn #16 Posted 26 October 2017 - 09:14 AM

    Moderator

  • Moderator
  • 9598 battles
  • 649
  • [WG_M] WG_M
  • Member since:
    05-23-2017
I will have to close this thread as we already have a pinned thread for MM discussions. For every kind of feedback regarding MM leave it there please.
Avoid creating new threads to discuss topics already under discussion. 

Have a nice day.






Also tagged with MM, Why, Wargaming

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users