Jump to content


Is it me or i the MM even worse than it was before?


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

HundeWurst #1 Posted 27 October 2017 - 07:05 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 67720 battles
  • 4,278
  • [FAME] FAME
  • Member since:
    02-06-2012

OK now we get the rather long q-times quit often on tier 10. That would be alright if the MM would also produce new and improved results but in the end nothing has changed.

 

Whatever they are doing its not working... Can we please stop?



Aikl #2 Posted 27 October 2017 - 07:06 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 25167 battles
  • 4,253
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011
I would guess that it's delaying because the goal is to 'force' people who want to into grand battles?

bstb3 #3 Posted 27 October 2017 - 07:07 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 37350 battles
  • 237
  • [VBRJ] VBRJ
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013
Yesterday I was in several battles at TX that were almost exclusively heavy tanks - literally 12 / 13 HT's per side. Haven't seen that in a long time, and certainly not in such quick succession. Does make me think they have changed something in the algorithm that is causing some weird results.

Havenless #4 Posted 27 October 2017 - 07:08 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 454 battles
  • 435
  • [-UM] -UM
  • Member since:
    12-18-2014
I think the way to solve this is to go +3/-3, changing arty so it will be easier to play and release a new Russian premium heavy. Fixed.

Edited by Havenless, 27 October 2017 - 07:09 PM.


mortalsatsuma #5 Posted 27 October 2017 - 07:21 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 13088 battles
  • 1,593
  • Member since:
    06-13-2014

View PostHavenless, on 27 October 2017 - 07:08 PM, said:

I think the way to solve this is to go +3/-3, changing arty so it will be easier to play and release a new Russian premium heavy. Fixed.

 

I would say don't give WG ideas but who are we kidding at this point, they're probably in the middle of implementing all of that for the next patch.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users