Jump to content


T110E5 weak

E5 buff

  • Please log in to reply
60 replies to this topic

Gamer_account_x #1 Posted 01 November 2017 - 09:42 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 11971 battles
  • 17
  • [EL_SQ] EL_SQ
  • Member since:
    11-15-2015
E5 too weak no penetration no armor and every shoot ammo rack. pls buff

japtank #2 Posted 01 November 2017 - 10:21 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27611 battles
  • 1,046
  • Member since:
    04-20-2012

I'm very surprised all the 5A players haven't jumped the gun already to tell you the E5 is balanced.

Weird...



JakeRoook #3 Posted 01 November 2017 - 10:22 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 260 battles
  • 276
  • Member since:
    04-20-2013
nice(top1 atm) tank for sleipnir moves though,  but slow as , idk why ppl play it

Edited by JakeRoook, 01 November 2017 - 10:23 PM.


soul3ater #4 Posted 01 November 2017 - 10:23 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18438 battles
  • 559
  • [OMNIA] OMNIA
  • Member since:
    07-27-2012

View Postjaptank, on 01 November 2017 - 09:21 PM, said:

I'm very surprised all the 5A players haven't jumped the gun already to tell you the E5 is balanced.

Weird...

 

says the guy who thinks type 4 and 5 are balanced. 

ExclamationMark #5 Posted 01 November 2017 - 10:23 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 16679 battles
  • 3,727
  • Member since:
    04-12-2013
yes please bring it back to post nerf, it was fine then, completely balanced :))))

ExclamationMark #6 Posted 01 November 2017 - 10:25 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 16679 battles
  • 3,727
  • Member since:
    04-12-2013

View PostJakeRoook, on 01 November 2017 - 10:22 PM, said:

nice(top1 atm) tank for sleipnir moves though,  but slow as , idk why ppl play it

 

yes, very good tank for sleipnov move

brumbarr #7 Posted 01 November 2017 - 10:31 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,283
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View Postjaptank, on 01 November 2017 - 10:21 PM, said:

I'm very surprised all the 5A players haven't jumped the gun already to tell you the E5 is balanced.

Weird...

 

As a 5A player I tell you the E5 is UP ad I prpose the followign buffs:

-reduce cupola height by 50%

-buff dpm by 5%

-buff topspeed to 40

 



JakeRoook #8 Posted 01 November 2017 - 10:32 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 260 battles
  • 276
  • Member since:
    04-20-2013

View Postbrumbarr, on 01 November 2017 - 09:31 PM, said:

 

As a 5A player I tell you the E5 is UP ad I prpose the followign buffs:

-reduce cupola height by 50%

-buff dpm by 5%

-buff topspeed to 40

 

you forgot to make it premium, smart boy



Derethim #9 Posted 01 November 2017 - 10:34 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 16421 battles
  • 1,711
  • Member since:
    04-03-2012

View Postbrumbarr, on 01 November 2017 - 10:31 PM, said:

 

As a 5A player I tell you the E5 is UP ad I prpose the followign buffs:

-reduce cupola height by 50%

-buff dpm by 5%

-buff topspeed to 40

 

 

Except the top speed. I don't think that's necessary..

brumbarr #10 Posted 01 November 2017 - 10:37 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,283
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostDerethim, on 01 November 2017 - 10:34 PM, said:

 

Except the top speed. I don't think that's necessary..

 

I dont think dpm and cupola buff are enough, and I cant think of any other buff that will not make it more similar to a SC , the topspeed reinforces its role as a ehavium.

Dava_117 #11 Posted 01 November 2017 - 10:59 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 17559 battles
  • 2,151
  • [B-BAS] B-BAS
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

View Postbrumbarr, on 01 November 2017 - 10:31 PM, said:

 

As a 5A player I tell you the E5 is UP ad I prpose the followign buffs:

-reduce cupola height by 50%

-buff dpm by 5%

-buff topspeed to 40

 

 

I disagree with cupola dimension. You have to fit a man inside it. But as an heavyum I would instead buff dispersion on the move parameter, to make it easier to shoot on the move, preventing enemy to have a clear shot on the cupola.

Edited by Dava_117, 01 November 2017 - 11:00 PM.


Derethim #12 Posted 01 November 2017 - 11:00 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 16421 battles
  • 1,711
  • Member since:
    04-03-2012

View PostDava_117, on 01 November 2017 - 10:59 PM, said:

 

I disagree with cupola dimension. You have to fit a man inside it. But as an heavyum I would instead buff dispersion on the move parameter, to make it easier to shoot on the move, preventing enemy to have a clear shot on the cupola.

 

There are cupola turrets way smaller in this game. I think it's alright.

Realism is bad for WoT.



brumbarr #13 Posted 01 November 2017 - 11:08 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,283
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostDava_117, on 01 November 2017 - 10:59 PM, said:

 

I disagree with cupola dimension. You have to fit a man inside it. But as an heavyum I would instead buff dispersion on the move parameter, to make it easier to shoot on the move, preventing enemy to have a clear shot on the cupola.

 

you dont need t ofit a man inside it, just a mans head, and all other cupolas i nthe game are way smaller, so obviously it works in real life...

And improvgn he gun handling just makes it a SC/FV



Dava_117 #14 Posted 01 November 2017 - 11:57 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 17559 battles
  • 2,151
  • [B-BAS] B-BAS
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

View Postbrumbarr, on 01 November 2017 - 11:08 PM, said:

 

you dont need t ofit a man inside it, just a mans head, and all other cupolas i nthe game are way smaller, so obviously it works in real life...

And improvgn he gun handling just makes it a SC/FV

 

Well, other cupolas don't have a machingun... BTW, the cupola IMMO should stay. If you agree that E5 should play as an heavium, better dipersion on travers and movement should help more than the cupola. May be it will become similar to SC, but wouldn't the cupola buff you suggest do the same?

japtank #15 Posted 02 November 2017 - 12:37 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27611 battles
  • 1,046
  • Member since:
    04-20-2012

View Postsoul3ater, on 01 November 2017 - 10:23 PM, said:

 

says the guy who thinks type 4 and 5 are balanced. 

 

The type 5 (the 4 is piece of junk, let it rot in peace) is broken but not overpowered. That's my point, and it has nothing to do with balance, while, admitedly, it serves the purpose artillery was supposed to  serve but don't derail the thread, thx.

__H3H3__ #16 Posted 02 November 2017 - 09:35 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 29971 battles
  • 577
  • [OXIDE] OXIDE
  • Member since:
    12-09-2013
T110E5 is a joke compared to the 5A. That tumor is too big its not even fun anymore.

MegaDeltaFighter #17 Posted 02 November 2017 - 09:55 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 31547 battles
  • 90
  • [GRFIN] GRFIN
  • Member since:
    08-10-2016
I think the whole 110e series have weak frontal armor, 110e3 110e4 and e5 I just researched and bought e3 T95 felt to have better armor compared to 110e3

_Sensation_ #18 Posted 02 November 2017 - 10:17 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 6043 battles
  • 279
  • [OMNI] OMNI
  • Member since:
    01-10-2017
Why play E5 when Super Conqueror is let's say.... Better in everything?

japtank #19 Posted 02 November 2017 - 10:18 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27611 battles
  • 1,046
  • Member since:
    04-20-2012

View PostMegaDeltaFighter, on 02 November 2017 - 09:55 AM, said:

I think the whole 110e series have weak frontal armor, 110e3 110e4 and e5 I just researched and bought e3 T95 felt to have better armor compared to 110e3

 

That's because of the lowerplate size.

The E3 is hard to miss, the T95 is hard to hit.

And the T95 has side armor too, and very small cupolas.

Win curves cleary show the T95 is way better than the E3.



MegaDeltaFighter #20 Posted 02 November 2017 - 10:30 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 31547 battles
  • 90
  • [GRFIN] GRFIN
  • Member since:
    08-10-2016

View Postjaptank, on 02 November 2017 - 10:18 AM, said:

 

That's because of the lowerplate size.

The E3 is hard to miss, the T95 is hard to hit.

And the T95 has side armor too, and very small cupolas.

Win curves cleary show the T95 is way better than the E3.

 

you are right and that's why I think the frontal armor needs a buff to be adequate to a tier X destroyer  





Also tagged with E5, buff

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users