Jump to content


Unexpected Performance Records - What's Yours?


  • Please log in to reply
25 replies to this topic

CircleOfSorrow #1 Posted 03 November 2017 - 10:09 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 28819 battles
  • 1,986
  • Member since:
    12-26-2012

At some stage I looked at my WR in both my T-54 and my Mod 1, and I had a 44 and 54 percent win-rate respectively.  I use the same crew, equipment, consumables, and playstyle in both of them.  Even though the T-54 is arguably much stronger for it's tier, my performance is much stronger in the Mod 1.

 

Anybody else got a set like this?



IncandescentGerbil #2 Posted 04 November 2017 - 01:45 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 35666 battles
  • 1,443
  • Member since:
    11-24-2015
52% in t54; 49% mod 1. Both over many, many games. I pretty much despise the mod 1 by now, but keep on playing it because I'm morally opposed to buying another premium.

TsundereWaffle #3 Posted 04 November 2017 - 02:00 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 26579 battles
  • 10,906
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    03-31-2013

58% in the Cromwell and 66% in the Cromwell B

Besides that, most similar tanks are pretty sinilar as well when it comes to wr



HassenderZerhacker #4 Posted 04 November 2017 - 03:15 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 25496 battles
  • 2,239
  • [1DPG] 1DPG
  • Member since:
    09-09-2015

I have often wondered if players were randomly assigned durable bonuses and maluses to individual tanks' winrates.

A possible advantage for WG of doing this would be to improve in-battle tank diversity.

 



ExclamationMark #5 Posted 04 November 2017 - 03:25 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 16679 battles
  • 3,727
  • Member since:
    04-12-2013

113 - 16 games, 31% wr, 2.7k DPG

E4 - 19 games, 21% wr 3.3k DPG... this one is especially sad because even triple platooning after 10 games didn't help one bit 

T28 Prot. - 21 games, 91% wr, 3k dpg... no I didn't play it during the solo platoon bug, definitely not :trollface:

 

Game wise - highest base exp game I've had to date was completely unexpected - playing borderline drunk at 2am in VK100.01P, and I get this: http://wotreplays.eu...e/3608111#stats :D



Havenless #6 Posted 04 November 2017 - 03:36 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 454 battles
  • 435
  • [-UM] -UM
  • Member since:
    12-18-2014

View PostExclamationMark, on 04 November 2017 - 05:25 AM, said:

113 - 16 games, 31% wr, 2.7k DPG

E4 - 19 games, 21% wr 3.3k DPG... this one is especially sad because even triple platooning after 10 games didn't help one bit 

 

aim for weak spots :) flank maus :) this is how u win more :)



ExclamationMark #7 Posted 04 November 2017 - 03:39 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 16679 battles
  • 3,727
  • Member since:
    04-12-2013

View PostHavenless, on 04 November 2017 - 03:36 AM, said:

aim for weak spots :) flank maus :) this is how u win more :)

 

:)))))

JocMeister #8 Posted 04 November 2017 - 05:57 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 21748 battles
  • 1,854
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    08-03-2015

Type 61, 74 Battles, 37% WR (WTF?) 1960 DPG

T-54 276 Battles 59% WR 1895 DPG.

 

 



Headless_Rooster #9 Posted 04 November 2017 - 10:56 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 9995 battles
  • 515
  • [W-UNI] W-UNI
  • Member since:
    01-04-2017
Grinding T-44, first 150 battles from stock got the WR up to 56% and got the first mark, thought I'd found a tank the suits me, another 70 battles elited and I've got it down to 44% :confused:

CircleOfSorrow #10 Posted 04 November 2017 - 12:21 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 28819 battles
  • 1,986
  • Member since:
    12-26-2012

View PostHeadless_Rooster, on 04 November 2017 - 09:56 AM, said:

Grinding T-44, first 150 battles from stock got the WR up to 56% and got the first mark, thought I'd found a tank the suits me, another 70 battles elited and I've got it down to 44% :confused:

 

That has happened to me, and it does really suck.



Lil_Dimitry #11 Posted 04 November 2017 - 12:25 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 2318 battles
  • 204
  • Member since:
    12-07-2014

Tier 9 is harder to play than tier 8, hence why your performance drops when you go 1 tier higher, it will drop even more when you go to tier 10.

 

  



Aikl #12 Posted 04 November 2017 - 12:38 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 25167 battles
  • 4,253
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

View PostExclamationMark, on 04 November 2017 - 02:25 AM, said:

(...)

Game wise - highest base exp game I've had to date was completely unexpected - playing borderline drunk at 2am in VK100.01P, and I get this: http://wotreplays.eu...e/3608111#stats :D

 

Seems balanced. :)

(Not that you could do decent with a potato-cannon armed 2CV, but still. Da-yum.)



Mimos_A #13 Posted 04 November 2017 - 12:42 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22118 battles
  • 1,842
  • [QSF-L] QSF-L
  • Member since:
    05-30-2015
Jagdpanther... Hall of fame had me in the top 50 of players at some point, now still at something like 70. I can't get a win in it for the life of me though... 43% wins after over a 100 games...

IncandescentGerbil #14 Posted 04 November 2017 - 12:43 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 35666 battles
  • 1,443
  • Member since:
    11-24-2015

View PostLil_Dimitry, on 04 November 2017 - 12:25 PM, said:

Tier 9 is harder to play than tier 8, hence why your performance drops when you go 1 tier higher, it will drop even more when you go to tier 10.

 

  

I have to say I find Tier 9 much easier, generally, than 8 or 10. 



Enforcer1975 #15 Posted 04 November 2017 - 12:51 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 20465 battles
  • 10,528
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014

View PostLil_Dimitry, on 04 November 2017 - 12:25 PM, said:

Tier 9 is harder to play than tier 8, hence why your performance drops when you go 1 tier higher, it will drop even more when you go to tier 10.

 

 

 

I wouldn't say so. Tier 9 has more or less prefferential matchmaking and are way stronger than most tier 8 tanks. Every mistake might be more fatal compared to lower tiers and it will cost you more. Other than that if you understand game mechanics half way which a lot of failrushers don't you can more or less breal even in the long run. I might not be that good in my Obj 140 yet but i don't see a reason why i have a better WR in the T49 of which half the games is played post LT scramble compared to the T-54 or T-54 ltwt. My T-30 and especially the T-10 have better WR. I play both the T49 and ltwt aggressively and i have almost 7% less WR in the ltwt which imo is more suited for aggressive gameplay.

X534 #16 Posted 04 November 2017 - 02:57 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 23475 battles
  • 1,339
  • [BAC0N] BAC0N
  • Member since:
    05-16-2011

Gets 61.93% WR with the jagdpanther 2 with 331 battles

 

Tries out the Ferdinand: 12.50% WR and rage sold.

 

Also comparing my Lowe and Tiger 2 together is rather laughable as they should both have a similar playstyle: Lowe has 66.79% WR while my tiger 2 only has 49.46% WR (lol?)



ClassicFrog #17 Posted 04 November 2017 - 03:06 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 44194 battles
  • 2,981
  • Member since:
    04-05-2012
While you can influence the game, the more skill you have the greater the influence, it's still very random. And you don't even need to look at two similar tanks. Look at one of them. Any of them. Haven't you ever had a loss streak where you simply could not win and then suddenly you had a chain of victories, one after another, still in the same tank? So there you have it. There is no magical difference between tanks. It's just the random nature of the game itself. Don't try to give it more credit it deserves. It will only spoil your fun.

Edited by ClassicFrog, 04 November 2017 - 03:07 PM.


Lil_Dimitry #18 Posted 04 November 2017 - 03:17 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 2318 battles
  • 204
  • Member since:
    12-07-2014

View PostEnforcer1975, on 04 November 2017 - 01:51 PM, said:

 

I wouldn't say so. Tier 9 has more or less prefferential matchmaking and are way stronger than most tier 8 tanks. Every mistake might be more fatal compared to lower tiers and it will cost you more. Other than that if you understand game mechanics half way which a lot of failrushers don't you can more or less breal even in the long run. I might not be that good in my Obj 140 yet but i don't see a reason why i have a better WR in the T49 of which half the games is played post LT scramble compared to the T-54 or T-54 ltwt. My T-30 and especially the T-10 have better WR. I play both the T49 and ltwt aggressively and i have almost 7% less WR in the ltwt which imo is more suited for aggressive gameplay.

 

   It's very hard to judge what someone is doing wrong by looking at his stats, for me personally I need a couple of replays to give advice to someone who wants to improve. That being said, it does seem that the sweetspot for the current MM is tier 9 (especially for light tanks). 

 

  I don't know what you're doing wrong in the ltwt and the t54 compared to the t49 but you obviously are, it's up to you to figure it out what exactly is the problem. Maybe you're just not bullying lowtiers in your t54ltwt and your t54, which you should, maybe you're playing too aggressive, maybe you're not doing the initial spotting, it could be a dozen different reasons why you fail to perform.

 

  But overall, the lower the tier the easier it is to play.



W0Z #19 Posted 04 November 2017 - 03:38 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 51226 battles
  • 810
  • Member since:
    01-30-2011

Type 5 Chi-Ri

284 games 58% W/R. Thats grinding it from stock with a crew with no skills.



Enforcer1975 #20 Posted 04 November 2017 - 03:43 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 20465 battles
  • 10,528
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014

View PostLil_Dimitry, on 04 November 2017 - 03:17 PM, said:

 

   It's very hard to judge what someone is doing wrong by looking at his stats, for me personally I need a couple of replays to give advice to someone who wants to improve. That being said, it does seem that the sweetspot for the current MM is tier 9 (especially for light tanks).

 

  I don't know what you're doing wrong in the ltwt and the t54 compared to the t49 but you obviously are, it's up to you to figure it out what exactly is the problem. Maybe you're just not bullying lowtiers in your t54ltwt and your t54, which you should, maybe you're playing too aggressive, maybe you're not doing the initial spotting, it could be a dozen different reasons why you fail to perform.

 

  But overall, the lower the tier the easier it is to play.

 

I'm probably just too aggressive in it compared to the T49 and relying too much on the team to come and help out when i have spotted the first enemy tanks and stop their initial push, the thing is it's difficult to get away sometimes when you are "too far ahead" of your redline camping team. Same with the T-54. It's a med sure but it has a more or less good turret to go hulldown at certain spots.

My biggest mistake i never learn from is to rely on the team to advance to key positions and i'm always left alone, really have to work on that. Seems it works out better in some tanks like f.e. the T-10 because it is a lot stronger than the T-54 in most situations. I rarely go into a cqb fight when i see i can make a difference pushing with the meds.


 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users