Jump to content


Update 9.21 Preview


  • Please log in to reply
179 replies to this topic

ybsone #21 Posted 09 November 2017 - 12:31 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 22289 battles
  • 96
  • Member since:
    06-07-2012
I look forward to this tier9 tank, I hope it will be simillar to M103

Dollars87 #22 Posted 09 November 2017 - 12:32 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 31417 battles
  • 151
  • Member since:
    03-22-2011

Havent won any match in 2 days , maybe in this patch  they will fix they  "balancer" ... NOT

Edited  [edited], and i dont care if its rude , they deserver every bad thing ,they  earned it...

 

This post has been edited by the moderation team due to swearing. 


Edited by VMX, 11 November 2017 - 12:06 PM.


Berto72 #23 Posted 09 November 2017 - 12:41 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 65438 battles
  • 1,579
  • [ORKI2] ORKI2
  • Member since:
    03-22-2011

Badger:

if confirmed, 22 deg of turn is 3 deg below the worse TD X turn.

really too slow, too much slow.



paolotk #24 Posted 09 November 2017 - 12:46 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 38371 battles
  • 816
  • [ORKI] ORKI
  • Member since:
    07-26-2012
How many new bugs will come with this update?

etody77 #25 Posted 09 November 2017 - 12:47 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 77903 battles
  • 1,478
  • [JMA] JMA
  • Member since:
    09-12-2015

Because someone mentioned the ' Mighty Premium Ammo', can we have increased prices for this kind of ammo please? It seams that many people are spending money to buy this kind of ammo, evenon low tiers ( i was killed in my L-60, tier 2 swedish premium LT with premium ammo). If the rich childrens want to buy good stats and winrate, atleast take their money, WG.



Jethro_Grey #26 Posted 09 November 2017 - 12:59 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 5123 battles
  • 851
  • [KAIN] KAIN
  • Member since:
    08-01-2015

I suggest to decrease the price of premium ammo significantly.

A lot of players fire it anyway, it would alow us to make still some profit and it would pi$$ off the entire "remove premium ammo" faction to no end! Win-Win!



DoomHerald #27 Posted 09 November 2017 - 01:05 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 72416 battles
  • 212
  • [VNOMS] VNOMS
  • Member since:
    09-13-2013
Yesterday when I was playing in my Super Conqueror I had 5 (five!) grand battles in a row! I don't complain as I won 4 of them and 1 draw (with empty clip), but new epic maps are vastly needed for sure. And maybe increasing ammo capacity for that mode, cause for example FV215b has only 35 shells and it will run out of ammo even faster than the SupConq.

NoTactic0_0 #28 Posted 09 November 2017 - 01:14 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 32697 battles
  • 39
  • [3DBFE] 3DBFE
  • Member since:
    03-01-2013
Ok, ok. But where are the HD maps promissed for this year?

ilDuca #29 Posted 09 November 2017 - 01:18 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Beta Tester
  • 24928 battles
  • 87
  • [JOULE] JOULE
  • Member since:
    01-07-2011

Good another nice tier X get removed, prepare your gold to unlock the deathstar since it will be replaced by a crap t95 with tier X MM.....

Forget about the buff to the others tank in the line since when the line in good the tier X has to sucks(except russians).



Burty61 #30 Posted 09 November 2017 - 01:19 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 12472 battles
  • 715
  • Member since:
    04-28-2013

View Postybsone, on 09 November 2017 - 12:31 PM, said:

I look forward to this tier9 tank, I hope it will be simillar to M103

 Hopefully better than the M103 as that is a bit mediocre to average at best.



leggasiini #31 Posted 09 November 2017 - 01:19 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 18176 battles
  • 6,487
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

View PostBurty61, on 09 November 2017 - 02:19 PM, said:

 Hopefully better than the M103 as that is a bit mediocre to average at best.

 

Think tier 9 Liberte.

NoPoet406 #32 Posted 09 November 2017 - 01:23 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 2444 battles
  • 509
  • [USAW] USAW
  • Member since:
    07-01-2016

Finally, the British AT line gets some love. Unfortunately it seems like the love is only going to the top tiers as usual, although I'm about to purchase an AT8 so hopefully this will be fixed, as I've heard it is one of the more reviled tanks (tier 5 armour in tier 6, 7 and 8 games, in a tank that is one of the slowest in the game). Would have loved better terrain resistance, a better choice of engines etc, considering how Russian tanks all seem to have super-duper engine lineups. What's wrong with "gimmicking" a few ahistorical engine choices, considering the AT tanks didn't exist anyway? EDIT: Given that the article is vague, how will my AT 15A be affected? It's invincible in some games, I've taken on whole armies and driven straight over them, then in other games I've been ROFLstomped immediately. Some consistency would be nice.

 

Also - we should get some form of compensation for the disastrous chat problems. It might seem like nothing, but people are paying to play this game and we expect some form of redress for WG's mistakes. And regardless of the source of the chat problems, this is WG's game, this is WG's service, so WG needs to make amends. They haven't even apologised.


Edited by NoPoet406, 09 November 2017 - 01:25 PM.


LCpl_Jones #33 Posted 09 November 2017 - 01:29 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14111 battles
  • 1,430
  • Member since:
    06-17-2017

View Postetody77, on 09 November 2017 - 12:17 PM, said:

 

...... And try to fight 1 vs 1 against a cromwell in open field, T34 has nochances to win

 

 

so a big slow tank can't beat an agile fast tank in an open field, no crapshirlock. would be a different outcome in a street fight though wouldn't it

 

you wouldn't beat a striv s1 either simply because you wouldn't see it

 

the being in an open field is the problem 

 



options71 #34 Posted 09 November 2017 - 01:53 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 53896 battles
  • 39
  • [FILO] FILO
  • Member since:
    06-08-2011

Why not plus 1 minus1 mm?

Why  not remove gold  ammo..?

Why not use new maps  (reworked  previous  ones)

Why  not proper  test game before release  new  update?

Community adresses  these  issues  on daily  basis... but 



etody77 #35 Posted 09 November 2017 - 02:08 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 77903 battles
  • 1,478
  • [JMA] JMA
  • Member since:
    09-12-2015

View PostLCpl_Jones, on 09 November 2017 - 01:29 PM, said:

 

 

so a big slow tank can't beat an agile fast tank in an open field, no crapshirlock. would be a different outcome in a street fight though wouldn't it

 

you wouldn't beat a striv s1 either simply because you wouldn't see it

 

the being in an open field is the problem 

 

 

T34 is not good in street fights too. Because he has very poor frontal armour. The big dispersion and big accuracy make this tank useless in maps like prokhorovka. Maybe you are a defender owner and yeah, you like to smash other tier 8 premium tanks. And try to fight on a street with maus or type5 heavy. I buyed T34 to make credits, but i make more credits with O-Ni against tier 9

Edited by etody77, 09 November 2017 - 02:16 PM.


ManaFortress #36 Posted 09 November 2017 - 02:20 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 7337 battles
  • 60
  • Member since:
    01-28-2012

View Postfranar, on 09 November 2017 - 01:14 PM, said:

Ok, ok. But where are the HD maps promissed for this year?

 

HD maps where never promised to be released this year.

It is likley they want to finish converting some more of the SD maps into HD before they introduce HD maps,

since once they make the HD map change, they will nolonger be able to have SD maps in the game anymore.

(Since the HD maps use a different game engine.)

 

To only have 12 Maps is probably too few, especially since many of them have teir restrictions, so they will probably wait untill they have converted more maps to HD.

The fact that they are just about to release another SD map for grand battles, should imply that HD map introduction is still not coming anytime soon.

I assume that atleast one grand battles map will need to be converted into HD before HD maps are to be released, else they would need to disable that gamemode.


Edited by ManaFortress, 09 November 2017 - 02:25 PM.


nicholas81 #37 Posted 09 November 2017 - 02:24 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 100218 battles
  • 55
  • [RO-AF] RO-AF
  • Member since:
    05-04-2013

you eliminated AP shells from artys because it was dealing a lot of damage/shoot , but u didnt do anything about brithis td's that destroys tier 10 with 1 shoot. 

FV183 shootig HE -1800 dmg/shot

T92 shooting HE - 600 dmg/ shoot

why u keep FV183 in game? ..

 



jack_timber #38 Posted 09 November 2017 - 02:25 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 42872 battles
  • 3,612
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    07-26-2014

New map great

New map for GB great

New T10 British TD great

New French heavies not interested

So 3 out 4 ain't at all bad

Forgot... Keep deathstar great

So 4 out 5 now


Edited by jack_timber, 09 November 2017 - 02:27 PM.


Berto72 #39 Posted 09 November 2017 - 02:42 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 65438 battles
  • 1,579
  • [ORKI2] ORKI2
  • Member since:
    03-22-2011

View PostilDuca, on 09 November 2017 - 12:18 PM, said:

Good another nice tier X get removed, prepare your gold to unlock the deathstar since it will be replaced by a crap t95 with tier X MM.....

Forget about the buff to the others tank in the line since when the line in good the tier X has to sucks(except russians).

 

with this, looks like you have not any idea about this. and about badgers stats compared to t95.

edit: and looks like you have not any idea about tier X  in general too...


Edited by Berto72, 09 November 2017 - 03:09 PM.


Psticide #40 Posted 09 November 2017 - 02:43 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 46105 battles
  • 348
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

stop removing inscriptions and camos from my tanks, its rude , invasive and downright bad busines practise, costing u my gold, no way im giving u guys another cent if u keep changing stuff and not compensating me.

 

Still have a arty crew member with AP shell skill that is useles cause u decided to change stuff that didnt need changing and offered no fix for it. U think im gonna pay gold for your incompetence .... think again, my gold going to war blunder 

 

and say again how obj216 has enough ammo for grand battles, i dare u to fracking say that out loud in public again, ur clueles and pissing of your customers needlesly through sheer incompetence.  ....  no need to mention friend list and no communication about it, thats how WG EU Rolls these days ... deaf and mute


Edited by Psticide, 09 November 2017 - 02:45 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users