Jump to content


Can we all at least agree on one thing?


  • Please log in to reply
27 replies to this topic

Poll: Tanks with rear-mounted turrets are lame. Yes? (47 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

Tanks with rear-mounted turrets are lame. Yes?

  1. Yes, they are lame. (15 votes [31.91%])

    Percentage of vote: 31.91%

  2. No, they are not lame. (32 votes [68.09%])

    Percentage of vote: 68.09%

Vote Hide poll

qpranger #1 Posted 13 November 2017 - 11:35 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 33765 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013
Tanks with rear-mounted turrets are lame. Yes?

Edited by qpranger, 13 November 2017 - 11:36 PM.


TheOddRogue #2 Posted 13 November 2017 - 11:38 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 10104 battles
  • 475
  • Member since:
    08-08-2012

View Postqpranger, on 13 November 2017 - 10:35 PM, said:

Tanks with rear-mounted turrets are lame. Yes?

 

In general it is a disadvantage and can be awkward to play with. 

 

But if the tank has features that compensates the awkwardness, such as obj 416 for example, it can be a powerful and quite enjoyable tank to play. 



Pvt_Duffer #3 Posted 13 November 2017 - 11:42 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 16667 battles
  • 3,200
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-11-2011

But the Chrysler, it's totally OP.

isn't it?



Enforcer1975 #4 Posted 13 November 2017 - 11:42 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 20973 battles
  • 10,932
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014
Hamsters are lame.

qpranger #5 Posted 13 November 2017 - 11:45 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 33765 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013

View PostEnforcer1975, on 14 November 2017 - 12:42 AM, said:

Dingers are lame.

 

OK.



TheOddRogue #6 Posted 13 November 2017 - 11:54 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 10104 battles
  • 475
  • Member since:
    08-08-2012
Why is everyone suddenly hating on Qpranger, he is a harmless shitposting hamster :)

unhappy_bunny #7 Posted 14 November 2017 - 12:01 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 18577 battles
  • 2,862
  • [-OC-] -OC-
  • Member since:
    08-01-2012

View PostTheOddRogue, on 13 November 2017 - 11:54 PM, said:

Why is everyone suddenly hating on Qpranger, he is a harmless shitposting hamster :)

 

He's a QPR fan. Isnt that enough of a reason.

 

Actually, on reflection, it is more of a reason to show him sympathy or even pity. 

 

We need a World Hug a Hamster day.


Edited by unhappy_bunny, 14 November 2017 - 12:03 AM.


xx984 #8 Posted 14 November 2017 - 12:03 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 56427 battles
  • 2,617
  • [SHEKL] SHEKL
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013
Drive backwards. Problem solved. 

cragarion #9 Posted 14 November 2017 - 12:06 AM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 44612 battles
  • 2,846
  • Member since:
    07-10-2010

The only people who think they are lame are the ones who don't know how to use them,

rear turreted tanks make the best wall scrapers,

you don't have to back so much of your tank out before you can bring your gun to bear,



xx984 #10 Posted 14 November 2017 - 12:06 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 56427 battles
  • 2,617
  • [SHEKL] SHEKL
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013

View Postcragarion, on 13 November 2017 - 11:06 PM, said:

The only people who think they are lame are the ones who don't know how to use them,

rear turreted tanks make the best wall scrapers,

you don't have to back so much of your tank out before you can bring your gun to bear,

FV215B, Pz VII, VK 72 say hi :hiding:



Rati_Festa #11 Posted 14 November 2017 - 12:16 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 44393 battles
  • 1,640
  • Member since:
    02-10-2012
The obj 430 II is a beast in the right hands. It predecessor is also v good in a different way, sniping. The heavy versions need some tlc but still have their uses imo.

Strappster #12 Posted 14 November 2017 - 12:52 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 25613 battles
  • 9,984
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View Postunhappy_bunny, on 13 November 2017 - 11:01 PM, said:

He's a QPR fan.

 

I've always read it as q-pranger, which makes him a Dinger fan but he couldn't quite remember the clan's name when he signed up.

 

Bless 'im. :great:



HeidenSieker #13 Posted 14 November 2017 - 01:06 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 10046 battles
  • 4,652
  • Member since:
    03-26-2016

View Postqpranger, on 13 November 2017 - 11:35 PM, said:

Tanks with rear-mounted turrets are lame. Yes?

 

That does not compute. Tanks have no legs.

Homer_J #14 Posted 14 November 2017 - 01:15 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 29705 battles
  • 31,448
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostStrappster, on 13 November 2017 - 11:52 PM, said:

 

I've always read it as q-pranger, 

 

Me to, or QP-Ranger, which I imagined as something like the Lone Ranger but in hamster form.



Pvt_Duffer #15 Posted 14 November 2017 - 02:00 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 16667 battles
  • 3,200
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-11-2011
News at 11 (01:00), no, we can't all agree on one thing.

Balc0ra #16 Posted 14 November 2017 - 02:08 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 67385 battles
  • 17,103
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
As a 416 owner... I have to disagree with you on that one.

Tomotorqemada #17 Posted 14 November 2017 - 03:32 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 17512 battles
  • 415
  • Member since:
    03-21-2017

View Postunhappy_bunny, on 14 November 2017 - 12:01 AM, said:

 

He's a QPR fan. Isnt that enough of a reason.

 

Actually, on reflection, it is more of a reason to show him sympathy or even pity. 

 

We need a World Hug a Hamster day.

 

When I had rats, hamsters were perfect food for them
PS obviously nothing to do with the OP bloke

Edited by Tomotorqemada, 14 November 2017 - 03:33 AM.


TheOddRogue #18 Posted 14 November 2017 - 03:36 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 10104 battles
  • 475
  • Member since:
    08-08-2012

View Postxx984, on 13 November 2017 - 11:03 PM, said:

Drive backwards. Problem solved. 

 

Lol! Lucky I wasn't drinking coffee, I would've ruined my monitor xD.

TheOddRogue #19 Posted 14 November 2017 - 03:38 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 10104 battles
  • 475
  • Member since:
    08-08-2012

View PostHomer_J, on 14 November 2017 - 12:15 AM, said:

 

Me to, or QP-Ranger, which I imagined as something like the Lone Ranger but in hamster form.

 

I just realized I read it as QP-ranger, Feels kinda awkward saying Q...Pranger, Pranger doesn't really come of the mouth all so naturally.

Homer_J #20 Posted 14 November 2017 - 03:52 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 29705 battles
  • 31,448
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostTheOddRogue, on 14 November 2017 - 02:38 AM, said:

 

Feels kinda awkward saying Q...Pranger, Pranger doesn't really come of the mouth all so naturally.

 

Well a prang is slang for a motoring or aircraft accident, so a pranger would be someone prone to crashing into things.

 

Or apparently a pranger is a punishment device used for public humiliation, which seems somehow appropriate. 

Maybe that's what the post liking is all about. :unsure:


Edited by Homer_J, 14 November 2017 - 03:55 AM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users