Jump to content


Buff the armor of Type4.


  • Please log in to reply
32 replies to this topic

Search_Warrant #1 Posted 16 November 2017 - 10:37 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 26690 battles
  • 5,892
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011

GOT YAH! but seriously... buff this things armor SOMEWHERE as im playing this trash heap and arty is nailing me for 500+ which is wrong and unfair. how can arty actually deal such stupid ammount of damage to my SUPER HEAVY? i cant move i cant push i cant do anything! this thing takes stupid ammounts of HE damage for no god dam reason.

 

I dont care if you hate it coz of the gun i really dont. but if WG fix this things gun in the future. i expect my tank not to take 500+ hits from arty all the god dam time, hell. i got ammoracked yeh..ammorack damaged by arty frontally. the things already got a aids gun. 21 second reload.. i get ammoracked i should just get sent to garage and compensated for emotional damages. this thing already goes horrificly slow but you buffed tanks like T28/proto top speed because it was too slow? now get stunned by arty... its wrist cuttingly bad.

 

#WeFixedArty



Balc0ra #2 Posted 16 November 2017 - 10:53 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 64454 battles
  • 15,472
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

 Not what you said about super heavies 2 days ago. But mkay. I guess -2 really don't need a chance vs it if you buff the armor or?

 

Just trying to understand your angle vs what you wanted about the Maus. As tier for tier, this is really not much better.


Edited by Balc0ra, 16 November 2017 - 10:53 PM.


Tiger_Panzermeyer #3 Posted 16 November 2017 - 10:53 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 9075 battles
  • 121
  • Member since:
    04-06-2017
first buff is6

Search_Warrant #4 Posted 16 November 2017 - 11:01 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 26690 battles
  • 5,892
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011

View PostBalc0ra, on 16 November 2017 - 09:53 PM, said:

 Not what you said about super heavies 2 days ago. But mkay. I guess -2 really don't need a chance vs it if you buff the armor or?

 

Just trying to understand your angle vs what you wanted about the Maus. As tier for tier, this is really not much better.

 

Im not saying buff usefull armor that hurts lower tiers. im saying buff that magical super low armor place that arty HE doesent royally crew the tank from arty.

Scabolcz #5 Posted 16 November 2017 - 11:06 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 13563 battles
  • 332
  • Member since:
    07-16-2014

View PostTiger_Panzermeyer, on 16 November 2017 - 10:53 PM, said:

first buff is6

 

Edited a lot...

EDIT: Why is P E N I S censured btw?

 

This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks. 


Edited by VMX, 18 November 2017 - 12:08 PM.


Dis4ster #6 Posted 16 November 2017 - 11:17 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 27952 battles
  • 2,940
  • Member since:
    02-12-2012

View PostScabolcz, on 16 November 2017 - 11:06 PM, said:

 

Edited a lot...

EDIT: Why is P E N I S censured btw?

 

Because of to high penetration value.

Edited by VMX, 18 November 2017 - 12:09 PM.


CaptainThunderWalker #7 Posted 16 November 2017 - 11:25 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 18937 battles
  • 1,297
  • Member since:
    09-25-2015

View PostSearch_Warrant, on 16 November 2017 - 11:01 PM, said:

 

Im not saying buff usefull armor that hurts lower tiers. im saying buff that magical super low armor place that arty HE doesent royally crew the tank from arty.

 

...Type 64 received a huge buff with 9.18 because of the loss of its scout MM, to the point it's borderline broken.

And you want to buff it even more?

 

No ty, that thing should remain vulnerable to HE.



japtank #8 Posted 17 November 2017 - 12:07 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27619 battles
  • 1,046
  • Member since:
    04-20-2012

Type 4 has weakspots.

It like it the way it is.



Dava_117 #9 Posted 17 November 2017 - 12:20 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 18597 battles
  • 2,765
  • [B-BAS] B-BAS
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah

 

No... ahahahahahah...

 

On a serious note, you already got 250mm of frontal armour and 50-60mm of roof. What more may you want from a tier 9? 



JocMeister #10 Posted 17 November 2017 - 05:58 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 21882 battles
  • 1,878
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    08-03-2015

View PostSearch_Warrant, on 16 November 2017 - 10:37 PM, said:

GOT YAH! but seriously... buff this things armor SOMEWHERE as im playing this trash heap and arty is nailing me for 500+ which is wrong and unfair. how can arty actually deal such stupid ammount of damage to my SUPER HEAVY? i cant move i cant push i cant do anything! this thing takes stupid ammounts of HE damage for no god dam reason.

 

I dont care if you hate it coz of the gun i really dont. but if WG fix this things gun in the future. i expect my tank not to take 500+ hits from arty all the god dam time, hell. i got ammoracked yeh..ammorack damaged by arty frontally. the things already got a aids gun. 21 second reload.. i get ammoracked i should just get sent to garage and compensated for emotional damages. this thing already goes horrificly slow but you buffed tanks like T28/proto top speed because it was too slow? now get stunned by arty... its wrist cuttingly bad.

 

#WeFixedArty

 

So arty hitting you for 500+ despite your armor is "wrong and unfair"? But when you do the same thing in your retarded ebola Type its all fine? I mean hitting a hull down IS7 for 500+ is legit eh?

 

Seriously. You are not getting any sympathy from me for playing that retarded idiot proof pile of manure that brings NOTHING positive to the game.

 


Edited by JocMeister, 17 November 2017 - 06:24 AM.


Excavatus #11 Posted 17 November 2017 - 06:51 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 18897 battles
  • 1,653
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    07-28-2013

View PostDava_117, on 17 November 2017 - 02:20 AM, said:

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah

 

No... ahahahahahah...

 

On a serious note, you already got 250mm of frontal armour and 50-60mm of roof. What more may you want from a tier 9? 

 

200+ on the roof may be?

vasilinhorulezz #12 Posted 17 November 2017 - 08:18 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22780 battles
  • 1,097
  • Member since:
    09-26-2014

View PostCaptainThunderWalker, on 16 November 2017 - 11:25 PM, said:

 

...Type 64 received a huge buff with 9.18 because of the loss of its scout MM, to the point it's borderline broken.

And you want to buff it even more?

 

No ty, that thing should remain vulnerable to HE.

 

Wrong thread or bad troll attemt? Who knows...

ZlatanArKung #13 Posted 17 November 2017 - 08:23 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 5,112
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View PostSearch_Warrant, on 16 November 2017 - 10:37 PM, said:

GOT YAH! but seriously... buff this things armor SOMEWHERE as im playing this trash heap and arty is nailing me for 500+ which is wrong and unfair. how can arty actually deal such stupid ammount of damage to my SUPER HEAVY? i cant move i cant push i cant do anything! this thing takes stupid ammounts of HE damage for no god dam reason.

 

I dont care if you hate it coz of the gun i really dont. but if WG fix this things gun in the future. i expect my tank not to take 500+ hits from arty all the god dam time, hell. i got ammoracked yeh..ammorack damaged by arty frontally. the things already got a aids gun. 21 second reload.. i get ammoracked i should just get sent to garage and compensated for emotional damages. this thing already goes horrificly slow but you buffed tanks like T28/proto top speed because it was too slow? now get stunned by arty... its wrist cuttingly bad.

 

#WeFixedArty

Why not remove arty instead?



leggasiini #14 Posted 17 November 2017 - 08:24 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 12463 battles
  • 6,084
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

Partially agree.

 

However, absolutely nope if they dont touch the derp gun first.

 

Im glad that the Type 4 is awful to play, has insanely long grind to Type 5 and you got a choice of either making it semi-okay (but atill godawful to play) but very expensive or not expensive but just trash (any other option other than gold spam derp). It prevents from some people reaching the Type 5. If the Type 4 was more comfier to grind that would mean more Type 5s and we do not need more Type 5s in battles.

 

They need to remove the derp and completely overhaul the armor layout (which involves removing cheeks, buffing upper plate, buffing mantlet, but then nerfing the LFP, cupola (make it smaller but weaker, like VK 4502 B cupola) and nerfing the spaced armor over side a bit). Directly buffing it is not an option, though, because that might create problems. That way it has weakspots but it can actually use its armor more properly than now. The armor layout is indeed annoying to use because you cannot rly angle it other than angling front from corners (which still does absolutely nothing VS gold).

 

Im in all for making the armor layout way more comfortable but im against giving it absolutely any buffs (other than buffing AP guns) as long as the derp gun stays the way it is (even if the gun stats are awful on Type 4, its still very cancer to fight against).

 

Type 4 is the definition of absolutely shitty game mechanic. Atleast Type 5 is semi-fun to play (even if it still can be frustrating at times). Type 4 is both cancer to play with it and cancer to play against. Literally no one enjoys it. And its p2w and to reliably pen it you need p2w back at it (you can actually pen it with AP unlike type5 but its enough unreliable to the point that I still load gold VS it). You cant go much worse with non-arty tank.


Edited by leggasiini, 17 November 2017 - 08:27 AM.


Dava_117 #15 Posted 17 November 2017 - 10:50 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 18597 battles
  • 2,765
  • [B-BAS] B-BAS
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

View PostExcavatus, on 17 November 2017 - 06:51 AM, said:

 

200+ on the roof may be?

 

Seems legit...

:teethhappy:



BravelyRanAway #16 Posted 17 November 2017 - 11:41 AM

    General

  • Beta Tester
  • 22408 battles
  • 8,768
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    12-29-2010

View PostBalc0ra, on 16 November 2017 - 09:53 PM, said:

 Not what you said about super heavies 2 days ago. But mkay. I guess -2 really don't need a chance vs it if you buff the armor or?

 

Just trying to understand your angle vs what you wanted about the Maus. As tier for tier, this is really not much better.

I'll condense it for you......."Nerf the tanks I don't have and buff the tanks I play"



Bennie182 #17 Posted 17 November 2017 - 12:06 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 51697 battles
  • 1,288
  • [WGL-A] WGL-A
  • Member since:
    03-13-2012

View PostSearch_Warrant, on 16 November 2017 - 10:37 PM, said:

GOT YAH! but seriously... buff this things armor SOMEWHERE as im playing this trash heap and arty is nailing me for 500+ which is wrong and unfair. how can arty actually deal such stupid ammount of damage to my SUPER HEAVY? i cant move i cant push i cant do anything! this thing takes stupid ammounts of HE damage for no god dam reason.

 

I dont care if you hate it coz of the gun i really dont. but if WG fix this things gun in the future. i expect my tank not to take 500+ hits from arty all the god dam time, hell. i got ammoracked yeh..ammorack damaged by arty frontally. the things already got a aids gun. 21 second reload.. i get ammoracked i should just get sent to garage and compensated for emotional damages. this thing already goes horrificly slow but you buffed tanks like T28/proto top speed because it was too slow? now get stunned by arty... its wrist cuttingly bad.

 

#WeFixedArty

unfair?Edited.. look at your own gun. does a lot more damage and needs 0 aiming. also it has no weakspots on front. don't dare to call those things on front "weakspots".

 

#balancedtype4 #nerftype4

 

--> This post has been edited by the moderation because naming hypoc*isy is not allowed I guess <-- #muteFoch


Edited by Bennie182, 18 November 2017 - 12:47 PM.


CaptainThunderWalker #18 Posted 17 November 2017 - 12:23 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 18937 battles
  • 1,297
  • Member since:
    09-25-2015

View Postvasilinhorulezz, on 17 November 2017 - 08:18 AM, said:

 

Wrong thread or bad troll attemt? Who knows...

 

I assume I have been very tired.

Stereoscope #19 Posted 17 November 2017 - 02:07 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 78465 battles
  • 218
  • Member since:
    10-25-2012

I think all Japanese tanks should get a large buff in armor.  IF for nothing else, to keep them as close to real as possible.  The Japanese tanks of WWII were famous for their huge armor and guns.  The Japanese designed them to deal easily with the heavy AT guns and tanks of the Chinese.

 



PaiNzzz #20 Posted 17 November 2017 - 02:10 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 16472 battles
  • 141
  • Member since:
    07-23-2011

hahahahahaha

χαχαχαχαχαχαχα

jajajajajajajajaja

xaxaxaxaxaxaxa

and again hahahahahahahaha

and yet again a little more hahaha!

Thank you!






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users