Jump to content


Analysis Of Non-Pen Shots VS Paper


  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

TungstenHitman #1 Posted 18 November 2017 - 01:50 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 21424 battles
  • 3,996
  • Member since:
    08-28-2016

Edit- I guess was just some ropey dispersion pattern after all and what appeared to be perfect hits were finding tracks and auot-bounce locations after all, even if it was with alarming regularity, never mind. Might as well close thread I suppose...

 

http://wotreplays.eu/site/3944375#stats

 

 

 

 


Edited by TungstenHitman, 18 November 2017 - 10:13 AM.


SovietBias #2 Posted 18 November 2017 - 01:55 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 37354 battles
  • 1,300
  • Member since:
    06-10-2013
'Analysis '

Aikl #3 Posted 18 November 2017 - 02:06 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 25247 battles
  • 4,349
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

Timestamps are really helpful if you want us to look at specifics.

Let's see... in time remaining:

11:20: Shot hits the rear wheel. https://i.imgur.com/66r6vpr.jpg

11:05: Shot hits the rear track wheel https://i.imgur.com/Pmg7aF0.jpg

10:50: Hits on the 'roof', not the side, because the S1 moved. https://i.imgur.com/SwBJpIy.jpg

09:04: Hits the track on the T20 (and tracks him) https://i.imgur.com/ne1awnu.jpg

07:34: Don't use autoaim unless you have to focus on the driving; even though it can be more effective to autoaim if you have to turn the hull to track the target.

 

The 'tracer' effect is likely not too accurate (IIRC it's client-generated), but if we look at the shot itself it should be fine. This might be due to the replay, of course, but still kinda funny, shot tracer 'bends' to sync up with where the shot hits: https://i.imgur.com/MBhwIVC.jpg

 

No need for a tinfoil hat here, you just have a moody gun with slow shell velocity for the most part.


Edited by Aikl, 18 November 2017 - 02:10 AM.


TungstenHitman #4 Posted 18 November 2017 - 02:40 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 21424 battles
  • 3,996
  • Member since:
    08-28-2016

View PostAikl, on 18 November 2017 - 01:06 AM, said:

Timestamps are really helpful if you want us to look at specifics.

Let's see... in time remaining:

11:20: Shot hits the rear wheel. https://i.imgur.com/66r6vpr.jpg

11:05: Shot hits the rear track wheel https://i.imgur.com/Pmg7aF0.jpg

10:50: Hits on the 'roof', not the side, because the S1 moved. https://i.imgur.com/SwBJpIy.jpg

09:04: Hits the track on the T20 (and tracks him) https://i.imgur.com/ne1awnu.jpg

07:34: Don't use autoaim unless you have to focus on the driving; even though it can be more effective to autoaim if you have to turn the hull to track the target.

 

The 'tracer' effect is likely not too accurate (IIRC it's client-generated), but if we look at the shot itself it should be fine. This might be due to the replay, of course, but still kinda funny, shot tracer 'bends' to sync up with where the shot hits: https://i.imgur.com/MBhwIVC.jpg

 

No need for a tinfoil hat here, you just have a moody gun with slow shell velocity for the most part.

 

In real time those shots seem so spot middle lol.. thanks for the freeze frame images anyway was very interesting just how wide of the middle and apparent trajectory they were in reality vs how the appeared to be during a live battle

Hedgehog1963 #5 Posted 18 November 2017 - 03:07 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 51189 battles
  • 7,425
  • [DIRTY] DIRTY
  • Member since:
    04-26-2011
A lack of understanding of the basic mechanics of how WoT works is no base for "analysis."

ZlatanArKung #6 Posted 18 November 2017 - 08:00 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 5,112
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014
Analysis not found.

Homer_J #7 Posted 18 November 2017 - 08:41 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 28291 battles
  • 29,477
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostTungstenHitman, on 18 November 2017 - 12:50 AM, said:

 I only hope this isn't a bad example because I haven't watched it 

 

You don't think maybe watching it before posting it would have been a good idea?



RamRaid90 #8 Posted 18 November 2017 - 12:40 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 21067 battles
  • 6,348
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

View PostHomer_J, on 18 November 2017 - 07:41 AM, said:

You don't think maybe watching it before posting it would have been a good idea?

 

I would have thought that is the basis for an analysis....

BP_OMowe #9 Posted 18 November 2017 - 11:09 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 24764 battles
  • 2,047
  • [-GY-] -GY-
  • Member since:
    01-08-2013

View PostHedgehog1963, on 18 November 2017 - 03:07 AM, said:

A lack of understanding of the basic mechanics of how WoT works is no base for "analysis."

 

Utterly missing the topic is no base for snide remarks.

Hedgehog1963 #10 Posted 18 November 2017 - 11:28 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 51189 battles
  • 7,425
  • [DIRTY] DIRTY
  • Member since:
    04-26-2011

View PostBP_OMowe, on 18 November 2017 - 10:09 PM, said:

 

Utterly missing the topic is no base for snide remarks.

 

And Op acknowledges the issue and wants the thread closed... so...

Jigabachi #11 Posted 18 November 2017 - 11:43 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17923 battles
  • 18,896
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

View PostHomer_J, on 18 November 2017 - 08:41 AM, said:

You don't think maybe watching it before posting it would have been a good idea?

Not if you desperately want to spam a thread every second day...



Homer_J #12 Posted 19 November 2017 - 08:34 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 28291 battles
  • 29,477
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostHedgehog1963, on 18 November 2017 - 10:28 PM, said:

 

And Op acknowledges the issue and wants the thread closed... so...

 

I have to say it's good to see OP both brought a replay and was happy with the explanation. :great:




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users