Jump to content


9.21 Custom camo system - poll

#customcamo #poll

  • Please log in to reply
43 replies to this topic

Poll: 9.21 Custom camo system (110 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

Custome camo is coming. You will ...

  1. use Cust. camo. I want to play with my Pink E100 on the battlefield. (28 votes [25.45%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 25.45%

  2. turn off this feature. I do not want to see Pink E100 on the battlefield. (72 votes [65.45%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 65.45%

  3. do not buy Cust. camo but turn it on. I do not waste my money but I want to see Pink E100 on the battlefield. (10 votes [9.09%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 9.09%

Vote Hide poll

Yaccay #1 Posted 27 November 2017 - 07:54 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31988 battles
  • 1,900
  • Member since:
    11-21-2012
Share your opinion.

Dava_117 #2 Posted 27 November 2017 - 07:56 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 18559 battles
  • 2,748
  • [B-BAS] B-BAS
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014
Third option, but just if pink tanks get -10% cammo value. :trollface:

Erwin_Von_Braun #3 Posted 27 November 2017 - 08:18 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 37396 battles
  • 4,530
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-25-2014

View PostDava_117, on 27 November 2017 - 06:56 PM, said:

Third option, but just if pink tanks get -10% cammo value. :trollface:

 

Add an extra zero to that -10% and we're nearly there:trollface:

xx984 #4 Posted 27 November 2017 - 08:27 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 52988 battles
  • 2,381
  • [GO-IN] GO-IN
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013
Whats the issue here? don't like it you will be able to turn it off, Just remember this is an arcade game, Not some game that pretends to be ultra realistic like War Thunder does. If people want different colour tanks than why not? its a way for WG to make money without bringing new OP tier 8 prems

pathed91 #5 Posted 27 November 2017 - 09:45 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 17841 battles
  • 199
  • Member since:
    03-09-2014

View Postxx984, on 27 November 2017 - 08:27 PM, said:

Whats the issue here? don't like it you will be able to turn it off, Just remember this is an arcade game, Not some game that pretends to be ultra realistic like War Thunder does. If people want different colour tanks than why not? its a way for WG to make money without bringing new OP tier 8 prems

 

The issue is the same as the anime tanks, the look just doesn't fit the game and would ruin the immersion for a lot of people. Personally I think the special camo schemes on tanks like Patriot are just as bad and should never have been introduced.

 

If the implement it in a way where you take current camo patterns and change it to reasonable colors (so NOT something like pink with purple stripes) I would be okay with it.



xx984 #6 Posted 27 November 2017 - 11:40 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 52988 battles
  • 2,381
  • [GO-IN] GO-IN
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013

View Postpathed91, on 27 November 2017 - 08:45 PM, said:

 

The issue is the same as the anime tanks, the look just doesn't fit the game and would ruin the immersion for a lot of people. Personally I think the special camo schemes on tanks like Patriot are just as bad and should never have been introduced.

 

If the implement it in a way where you take current camo patterns and change it to reasonable colors (so NOT something like pink with purple stripes) I would be okay with it.

 

It has the option to turn it off tho? So if you dont want your immersion broken (in an arcade tank game with health bars and all sorts lul) then disable the unhistorical colours? simple as that, you wont even see liberte or patriot etc

 

With the Anime weeb tanks, there is not a option to never see them in battle, otherwise i would be fine with them also. (Even if they havent been introduced on EU, on SEA server everyone has to get into battles with them and cannot enable a "never see these tanks in battle" kind of thing Afaik)


Edited by xx984, 27 November 2017 - 11:41 PM.


Jigabachi #7 Posted 27 November 2017 - 11:46 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17858 battles
  • 18,534
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011
...wait for the finished feature before making a decision.

Homer_J #8 Posted 28 November 2017 - 12:02 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27652 battles
  • 29,000
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostJigabachi, on 27 November 2017 - 10:46 PM, said:

...wait for the finished feature before making a decision.

 

That's not in keeping with this forum's tradition of pitchforks and torches.

brumbarr #9 Posted 28 November 2017 - 12:25 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostJigabachi, on 27 November 2017 - 11:46 PM, said:

...wait for the finished feature before making a decision.

Yeah, because when the feature is implemented they have time to change it. Experience has proven that if something is off, complain before its finished, otherwise you will get a bad thing implemented into the game. 

 



xx984 #10 Posted 28 November 2017 - 12:32 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 52988 battles
  • 2,381
  • [GO-IN] GO-IN
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013

View Postbrumbarr, on 27 November 2017 - 11:25 PM, said:

Yeah, because when the feature is implemented they have time to change it. Experience has proven that if something is off, complain before its finished, otherwise you will get a bad thing implemented into the game. 

 

 

but its not really a bad thing

speedphlux #11 Posted 28 November 2017 - 12:32 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 42490 battles
  • 1,704
  • [TZAR] TZAR
  • Member since:
    01-28-2011
Does look rather ugly. Would not use it in its current form. Would much rather see the already existing patterns have the abilities to change their colors then this poo.

OreH75 #12 Posted 28 November 2017 - 12:39 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 46926 battles
  • 1,984
  • [RANGR] RANGR
  • Member since:
    05-29-2013
Didnt vote, I miss the option "I couldn't care less if qpranger painted his tank pink".

Pantzer #13 Posted 28 November 2017 - 01:03 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 19561 battles
  • 158
  • Member since:
    06-30-2011

I love how people immediately gets upset and, as Homer_J said, brings out the pitchforks...

 

I like this new feature and have made a few post myself about a new camo system so I'm happy they finally make it.

 

And you can turn it off so there isn't any problem at all. I rather want people to have the chose then not to. So all good. Nice job WG.



xx984 #14 Posted 28 November 2017 - 01:10 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 52988 battles
  • 2,381
  • [GO-IN] GO-IN
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013

View PostPantzer, on 28 November 2017 - 12:03 AM, said:

I love how people immediately gets upset and, as Homer_J said, brings out the pitchforks...

 

I like this new feature and have made a few post myself about a new camo system so I'm happy they finally make it.

 

And you can turn it off so there isn't any problem at all. I rather want people to have the chose then not to. So all good. Nice job WG.

 

Exactly this.

 

And i cant stress it enough, Its a way for WG to monetize and make money with means other than prem account, and without releasing the next OP tier 8 prem, Its a win win.

 

Its a great thing, It allows people who want to be different and have a unique look do so, while also letting those who dont want to see it, be able to disable and not see it. Wargaming takes a step in the right direction and plans to introduce quite a novel feature and people start a riot about it. Yes they still need to fix MM but its most likely different people that work on this compared the the MM and Balancing teams, so its not really halting any progress there. No wonder WG does stupid things sometimes, When they actually do something nice people act like its the worst thing ever.



TheOddRogue #15 Posted 28 November 2017 - 01:16 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 9985 battles
  • 443
  • Member since:
    08-08-2012

OMGF THIS BEST crapSINCE PATCH 3

 

IM GONA MAKE STPUDIST crapEVER AS CAMO, I WILLL OFEND TYTOUR EYHES SO BADÖLY U QUITE GAME.



Yaccay #16 Posted 28 November 2017 - 07:55 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31988 battles
  • 1,900
  • Member since:
    11-21-2012

I like the result of this poll.

What is the point to paint your E100 to pink, if 71% of the players WILL NOT see it?



Hedgehog1963 #17 Posted 28 November 2017 - 08:48 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 50900 battles
  • 7,356
  • [DIRTY] DIRTY
  • Member since:
    04-26-2011
I run some mods that remove the WG logos from the AMX 12 57 and Super Bulldog.  My only worry is that swittcing off custom camouflage will stop those from working.

brumbarr #18 Posted 28 November 2017 - 08:48 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View Postxx984, on 28 November 2017 - 12:32 AM, said:

 

but its not really a bad thing

 

I never said it was :) 

 

Its fine for me, if you dont wanna see it turn it off, and its  better for people who do  want it.



jack_timber #19 Posted 28 November 2017 - 08:56 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 32454 battles
  • 1,886
  • Member since:
    07-26-2014

Not fussed either of the three ways:)

Don't like it switch off, like keep it enabled.



Homer_J #20 Posted 28 November 2017 - 09:40 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27652 battles
  • 29,000
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View Postxx984, on 27 November 2017 - 11:32 PM, said:

 

but its not really a bad thing

 

It's very reminiscent of tank horns, which we persuaded WG was a bad idea too.

 

and

View PostYaccay, on 28 November 2017 - 06:55 AM, said:

 

What is the point to paint your E100 to pink, if 71% of the players WILL NOT see it?

If I have paid for something then I didn't do it just for me.  If I bought a hat in TF2 I would want everyone to see it.  If I buy a pink turret for my IS-7 because I think it looks like a boobie then I want everyone to see it.  Making it optional doesn't make any sense.  Making it at all is disgusting.


Edited by Homer_J, 28 November 2017 - 09:41 AM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users