Jump to content


Petition for T110E5


  • Please log in to reply
40 replies to this topic

Poll: T110E5 (86 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

T110E5 armor

  1. We want old T110E5 armor (40 votes [46.51%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 46.51%

  2. Leave it like it is (46 votes [53.49%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 53.49%

Vote Hide poll

_TRT_MRT_SMRT_ #1 Posted 28 November 2017 - 10:36 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 38026 battles
  • 36
  • Member since:
    11-22-2013

We want our armor back!!!!....Personally i will never spend any money on this game until they start to respect us.

Why we spent months to grind T110E5 and at the end we got a crippled tank???

 

Lets see how many players want old T110E5 back



_EXODUZ_ #2 Posted 28 November 2017 - 10:39 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 34617 battles
  • 1,936
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    11-05-2014
Old E5 would be more or less fine right now, but pretty sure they don't care, it had it's glory. Don't expect anything for another year or so.

brumbarr #3 Posted 28 November 2017 - 10:39 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

No, It needs a buff, but it doesnt need its old armor back ,that old armor was as retarded as the vk1001P cupola.

 

Instead, buff it to enforce its role:

-buff topspeed to 40

-buff DPM to 2600 base

-make cupola the size of M48 cupola, but also make it only 200mm thick.



uglycousin #4 Posted 28 November 2017 - 10:43 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 43179 battles
  • 3,540
  • [TFUK] TFUK
  • Member since:
    09-01-2014

View Post_TRT_MRT_SMRT_, on 28 November 2017 - 11:36 AM, said:

We want our armor back!!!!....Personally i will never spend any money on this game until they start to respect us.

Why we spent months to grind T110E5 and at the end we got a crippled tank???

 

Lets see how many players want old T110E5 back

 

I agree with a buff, but maybe not just "the old" one.

 

View Postbrumbarr, on 28 November 2017 - 11:39 AM, said:

No, It needs a buff, but it doesnt need its old armor back ,that old armor was as retarded as the vk1001P cupola.

 

Instead, buff it to enforce its role:

-buff topspeed to 40

-buff DPM to 2600 base

-make cupola the size of M48 cupola, but also make it only 200mm thick.

 

More like this would be fine.



HugSeal #5 Posted 28 November 2017 - 10:55 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 22717 battles
  • 2,010
  • [SWEC] SWEC
  • Member since:
    05-10-2012
Isn't the old e5 armour pretty similar to the current one? Well, the cupola was a little weaker on the old model though.

ExclamationMark #6 Posted 28 November 2017 - 10:56 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 16679 battles
  • 3,727
  • Member since:
    04-12-2013

Nope.

A weakspot should be a weakspot, not something that you have to shoot gold at to have a 50/50 chance at penning. Just reduce the size of the cupula, give it a speed buff maybe, and buff DPM.

View PostHugSeal, on 28 November 2017 - 10:55 AM, said:

Isn't the old e5 armour pretty similar to the current one? Well, the cupola was a little weaker on the old model though.

 

It got a buff at some point to where the LFP and cupula were 50/50 pens with gold on a lot of tanks.


Edited by ExclamationMark, 28 November 2017 - 10:57 AM.


HugSeal #7 Posted 28 November 2017 - 11:06 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 22717 battles
  • 2,010
  • [SWEC] SWEC
  • Member since:
    05-10-2012

View PostExclamationMark, on 28 November 2017 - 10:56 AM, said:

It got a buff at some point to where the LFP and cupula were 50/50 pens with gold on a lot of tanks.

 

Yep, that's when I used it for the dumb missions. The perfect vehicle to block things. But that was the new-ish e5, nto th eold one imo.

 

TBH I still find the cupola a somewhat unreliable pen. Hit it straight on and you'll pen, but the shot doesn't need to veer off by much for it to bounce due to the angles on the cupola.


Edited by HugSeal, 28 November 2017 - 11:07 AM.


japtank #8 Posted 28 November 2017 - 11:19 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27619 battles
  • 1,046
  • Member since:
    04-20-2012

Wrong poll.

 

Many of us want it changed but not the way you suggest, please add an 'Improve E5' option, thank you.



XxKuzkina_MatxX #9 Posted 28 November 2017 - 11:20 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 47558 battles
  • 1,370
  • [RU18] RU18
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016

View Postbrumbarr, on 28 November 2017 - 11:39 AM, said:

No, It needs a buff, but it doesnt need its old armor back ,that old armor was as retarded as the vk1001P cupola.

 

Instead, buff it to enforce its role:

-buff topspeed to 40

-buff DPM to 2600 base

-make cupola the size of M48 cupola, but also make it only 200mm thick.

 

Which cupola? the old huge one or the current almost non existent one?

brumbarr #10 Posted 28 November 2017 - 11:41 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostXxKuzkina_MatxX, on 28 November 2017 - 11:20 AM, said:

 

Which cupola? the old huge one or the current almost non existent one?

 

current one ofcourse, which is about half the size of the old one.

Cobra6 #11 Posted 28 November 2017 - 12:01 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16332 battles
  • 15,505
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010

Hey Steve, didn't know you switched from your IS-7 to the T110E5, must have missed it

 

And no, we don't want the T110E5 armour back, it was broken. Cupola should retain the current armour but be made less prominent, rest should stay the same.

 

The solution to the T110E5 no longer being impenetrable but the competition (Maus/Type5) being, is not to create even more requirement to goldspamming. The solution is to nerf the Maus / Type5 and every other heavy tank that has "weakspots" with more armour than same tier guns have standard penetration.

 

Cobra 6


Edited by Cobra6, 28 November 2017 - 12:02 PM.


_TRT_MRT_SMRT_ #12 Posted 28 November 2017 - 12:10 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 38026 battles
  • 36
  • Member since:
    11-22-2013

View Postbrumbarr, on 28 November 2017 - 10:39 AM, said:

No, It needs a buff, but it doesnt need its old armor back ,that old armor was as retarded as the vk1001P cupola.

 

Instead, buff it to enforce its role:

-buff topspeed to 40

-buff DPM to 2600 base

-make cupola the size of M48 cupola, but also make it only 200mm thick.

 

Agree...until that time so long T110E5 i just sold it and bought a new baby .....M48 Patton

Love at a first game :)



Timewarp76 #13 Posted 28 November 2017 - 12:14 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Clan Commander
  • 19054 battles
  • 577
  • [BBMM] BBMM
  • Member since:
    04-10-2013

The T110E5 has the worst global winrate for a tier X heavy in the game at 46%, yes bring back the old armor before the latest nerf. In the current meta it is drastically needed.



TheWarrener #14 Posted 28 November 2017 - 12:16 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 2244 battles
  • 333
  • Member since:
    10-31-2017

Oh look, a 48%er grinded OP toy hoping it wouldn't get nerfed. How sad.

Also, *you* want. Not *we* want. 


Edited by TheWarrener, 28 November 2017 - 12:31 PM.


Jigabachi #15 Posted 28 November 2017 - 12:17 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17858 battles
  • 18,475
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011
The poll is pointless and the OP uses "we want" when he actually means "I want".


MrEdweird #16 Posted 28 November 2017 - 12:23 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 19348 battles
  • 269
  • [CIRC2] CIRC2
  • Member since:
    08-19-2011

Voted against, you are asking for pandering. The T110E5 used to be considered one of the best tanks in game back when its cupola was like 50mm thick.

Then people started overplaying it when it became ridiculously overpowered and now we have a middle ground. I still bounce the cupola center mass with 250mm pen guns.

 

Perhaps you should look at the brit heaves that now have much thicker side armor and are still trash armor-wise in the same way?



vasilinhorulezz #17 Posted 28 November 2017 - 12:25 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22780 battles
  • 1,092
  • Member since:
    09-26-2014

My E5 isn't stupidly broken anymore, give it again the retardproof armor it had,

and then I'll start a new thread complaining that everyone shoots premium ammo at me.

 

 

 

No, tanks should have weakspots, and those weakspots should be a viable pen (if you mange to hit them with the current accuracy, ofcourse).



Lomion_EU #18 Posted 28 November 2017 - 12:25 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 35415 battles
  • 579
  • [CSW] CSW
  • Member since:
    08-30-2012

Working Ok for me and I bought it post Nerf

 

T110E5 X 188 1762,87 55,85%


Cobra6 #19 Posted 28 November 2017 - 12:35 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16332 battles
  • 15,505
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010

View PostTimewarp76, on 28 November 2017 - 11:14 AM, said:

The T110E5 has the worst global winrate for a tier X heavy in the game at 46%, yes bring back the old armor before the latest nerf. In the current meta it is drastically needed.

 

Just because the current meta is absolutely f@cked and broken doesn't mean we have to add more tanks with unbalanced armour.

It means we have to rebalance the tanks that got over-buffed like the Maus/Type5/Defender which skewed the meta in the wrong direction to begin with.

 

Cobra 6



_TRT_MRT_SMRT_ #20 Posted 28 November 2017 - 12:57 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 38026 battles
  • 36
  • Member since:
    11-22-2013

View PostJigabachi, on 28 November 2017 - 12:17 PM, said:

The poll is pointless and the OP uses "we want" when he actually means "I want".

 

Of course that i want,but i want to know does other players want buff,so your comment is pointless  




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users