Jump to content


This is why the 907 is the CW tank of choice.


  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

brumbarr #1 Posted 28 November 2017 - 09:15 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

Since some people are quite stubborn and insist the 907 armor isnt broken, this is a perfect situation to show whats wrong with the tank:

 

Posted Image

 

DMG bocked by armor: 1950 , 6 shells received, 1 pen.

 

Enemy BC: 

Posted Image

 

If I was in a 140 or t62A here, or any other medium, I would be dead.



Radu_Korne #2 Posted 28 November 2017 - 09:22 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27938 battles
  • 1,403
  • [WEBAN] WEBAN
  • Member since:
    08-16-2013
T22 med flashbacks.... cold chills 

Cobra6 #3 Posted 28 November 2017 - 09:49 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16332 battles
  • 15,513
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010

Should have been me driving the 907, every shot would have penned :teethhappy:

 

Cobra 6



ExclamationMark #4 Posted 28 November 2017 - 10:37 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 16679 battles
  • 3,727
  • Member since:
    04-12-2013

View PostRadu_Korne, on 28 November 2017 - 09:22 PM, said:

T22 med flashbacks.... cold chills 

 

Precisely... at least with the 907 you can't sidescrape better than most heavies in the game. :D

_EXODUZ_ #5 Posted 28 November 2017 - 11:03 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 34617 battles
  • 1,936
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    11-05-2014

Guzman 1430 WN8

brumbarr 2923 WN8

 

Pretty sure that Bc would play differently if he had 3k WN8.



brumbarr #6 Posted 28 November 2017 - 11:16 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View Post_EXODUZ_, on 28 November 2017 - 11:03 PM, said:

Guzman 1430 WN8

brumbarr 2923 WN8

 

Pretty sure that Bc would play differently if he had 3k WN8.

 

so?

Nazgarth #7 Posted 28 November 2017 - 11:16 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 28472 battles
  • 1,135
  • [-TWO-] -TWO-
  • Member since:
    05-07-2011

View Post_EXODUZ_, on 28 November 2017 - 11:03 PM, said:

Guzman 1430 WN8

brumbarr 2923 WN8

 

Pretty sure that Bc would play differently if he had 3k WN8.

 

Yea, he would have Obj. 907 :trollface:

_EXODUZ_ #8 Posted 28 November 2017 - 11:42 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 34617 battles
  • 1,936
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    11-05-2014

View Postbrumbarr, on 28 November 2017 - 11:16 PM, said:

 

so?

 

So it's not a perfect way to show that 907 is OP.

 

View PostNazgarth, on 28 November 2017 - 11:16 PM, said:

 

Yea, he would have Obj. 907 :trollface:

 

Or a HEAT clip pre-loaded.



brumbarr #9 Posted 28 November 2017 - 11:45 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View Post_EXODUZ_, on 28 November 2017 - 11:42 PM, said:

 

So it's not a perfect way to show that 907 is OP.

 

 

Or a HEAT clip pre-loaded.

 

how is it not? Is a tank only OP when good players struggle?

It shows perfecty why the 907 is OP, the armor is retarded.

If  I was in any other tank I would have died.



_EXODUZ_ #10 Posted 28 November 2017 - 11:48 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 34617 battles
  • 1,936
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    11-05-2014

View Postbrumbarr, on 28 November 2017 - 11:45 PM, said:

 

how is it not? Is a tank only OP when good players struggle?

It shows perfecty why the 907 is OP, the armor is retarded.

If  I was in any other tank I would have died.

 

It IS OP and the armor IS retarded. I just don't think the guy handled the engagement well enough.

KillingJoker #11 Posted 29 November 2017 - 12:21 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 32055 battles
  • 1,307
  • [-EXC-] -EXC-
  • Member since:
    09-07-2015

one image doesnt proof anything... 

 

View Postbrumbarr, on 28 November 2017 - 09:15 PM, said:

Since some people are quite stubborn and insist the 907 armor isnt broken, this is a perfect situation to show whats wrong with the tank:

 

Posted Image

 

 

 

so, judging from your perspective of using a single image as an argument... i can say the T10 absolutly wreaks the 907 (at least in my hands lol)

 

 

*isnt amazing the splash damage you get when your not camping? 

 

 


Edited by KillingJoker, 29 November 2017 - 12:22 AM.


brumbarr #12 Posted 29 November 2017 - 12:50 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostKillingJoker, on 29 November 2017 - 12:21 AM, said:

one image doesnt proof anything... 

 

 

so, judging from your perspective of using a single image as an argument... i can say the T10 absolutly wreaks the 907 (at least in my hands lol)

 

 

*isnt amazing the splash damage you get when your not camping? 

 

 

 

It  isnt meant as proof, just serves as an illustration as why the 907 is so good.

brumbarr #13 Posted 29 November 2017 - 12:53 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View Post_EXODUZ_, on 28 November 2017 - 11:48 PM, said:

 

It IS OP and the armor IS retarded. I just don't think the guy handled the engagement well enough.

 

They rushed me with 2 BCs, all their shots bounced and I was able to kill them.

Did they play well, no, would I have done better? I doubt it, BC against 907 is quite hard.

But the strenght of the 907 is exactly that, it doesnt lose much or any HP against bad to avg player and  some  random shots in its direction.



xtrem3x #14 Posted 29 November 2017 - 02:23 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31597 battles
  • 1,353
  • [EFE-X] EFE-X
  • Member since:
    01-03-2013

View Postbrumbarr, on 28 November 2017 - 11:53 PM, said:

 

They rushed me with 2 BCs, all their shots bounced and I was able to kill them.

Did they play well, no, would I have done better? I doubt it, BC against 907 is quite hard.

But the strenght of the 907 is exactly that, it doesnt lose much or any HP against bad to avg player and  some  random shots in its direction.

 

You do realise that when WG nerf tanks they over nerf them right?

If WG chose to nerf the 907 it would get pounded so hard into the ground that it would be pointless having one.

 

As time goes on WG have been buffing tanks, give it a few more months and it'll probably fit right into the meta



RamRaid90 #15 Posted 29 November 2017 - 05:10 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 20549 battles
  • 6,279
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

View Postbrumbarr, on 28 November 2017 - 10:45 PM, said:

 

how is it not? Is a tank only OP when good players struggle?

It shows perfecty why the 907 is OP, the armor is retarded.

If  I was in any other tank I would have died.

 

What he's saying is that it's likely he autoaimed at least a few shots expecting the armour to be weaker.

 

Having said that, I don't think i've had any serious problems facing 907's. The most troublesome thing with them is they tend to be played almost exclusively by excellent players which makes them seem even worse than they are.

 

Sure it's an extremely strong tank, probably a little OP, but stuff it. Why shouldn't good players be rewarded with nice things ;)

 

At least you had to work hard to earn it, you couldn't just buy your way into OPness like the vast majoirty of Defender drivers (most of which still have horrible stats despite it being the best tank in the game...)


Edited by RamRaid90, 29 November 2017 - 05:13 AM.


uglycousin #16 Posted 29 November 2017 - 05:36 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 43179 battles
  • 3,540
  • [TFUK] TFUK
  • Member since:
    09-01-2014

View Postbrumbarr, on 28 November 2017 - 10:15 PM, said:

Since some people are quite stubborn and insist the 907 armor isnt broken, this is a perfect situation to show whats wrong with the tank:

 

Posted Image

 

DMG bocked by armor: 1950 , 6 shells received, 1 pen.

 

Enemy BC: 

Posted Image

 

If I was in a 140 or t62A here, or any other medium, I would be dead.

 

Ok, ok, you convinced me, I will be getting myself one. :great:

xx984 #17 Posted 29 November 2017 - 06:06 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 52971 battles
  • 2,380
  • [GO-IN] GO-IN
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013

I have had a game in the leopard 1 awhile ago where i bounced 2300 damage.

 

907 Is weak. Leopard 1 master race!

 

I shall try to join CW in my leopard 1 from now on! :izmena:



xtrem3x #18 Posted 29 November 2017 - 11:21 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31597 battles
  • 1,353
  • [EFE-X] EFE-X
  • Member since:
    01-03-2013

Bounced over 3.5k in my STB-1 a few months back. It must be OP.

 

I've never had a problem dealing with 907s so don't understand the problem



uglycousin #19 Posted 29 November 2017 - 11:44 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 43179 battles
  • 3,540
  • [TFUK] TFUK
  • Member since:
    09-01-2014

View Postxx984, on 29 November 2017 - 07:06 AM, said:

I have had a game in the leopard 1 awhile ago where i bounced 2300 damage.

 

907 Is weak. Leopard 1 master race!

 

I shall try to join CW in my leopard 1 from now on! :izmena:

 

I once bounced a Jageroo AP shell from my Leo 1 (dunno how, but it happened).

 

Leopard 1 confirmed OP, needs nerf.



LeGod7 #20 Posted 29 November 2017 - 11:58 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 847 battles
  • 162
  • Member since:
    12-24-2014

 

Posted Image

 

A medium tank that can bounce when it's clearly overangling and showing an almost flat side is just stupid. Plus the frontal hull is just as troll as well. 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users