Jump to content


Unofficial EU Server Statistics

Data from 26. November 2012

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
1138 replies to this topic

zmeul #1121 Posted 08 March 2013 - 12:58 AM

    Captain

  • Beta Tester
  • 19547 battles
  • 2,133
  • Member since:
    07-10-2010

View PostLiannaSilverwind, on 07 March 2013 - 10:22 PM, said:

Snib, please come back! ;)
not likely
lately I saw him posting on MechWarrior's forums

sonicology #1122 Posted 08 March 2013 - 01:03 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12717 battles
  • 250
  • Member since:
    04-17-2011

View Postzmeul, on 08 March 2013 - 12:58 AM, said:

lately I saw him posting on MechWarrior's forums

I hope he is enjoying MWO more than I did, I had big hopes for it but currently I feel like my Founders purchase was a massive waste of money  :Smile_sad:

zmeul #1123 Posted 08 March 2013 - 01:23 AM

    Captain

  • Beta Tester
  • 19547 battles
  • 2,133
  • Member since:
    07-10-2010

View Postsonicology, on 08 March 2013 - 01:03 AM, said:

I didn't bought a founder's and I'm glad, also have 0 plans on buying MC; perhaps when they'll open a EU server
they are heading fast towards pay2win on a large scale, via consumables

took a while, but finally, the ELO MM is working

sonicology #1124 Posted 08 March 2013 - 07:43 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12717 battles
  • 250
  • Member since:
    04-17-2011

View Postzmeul, on 08 March 2013 - 01:23 AM, said:

I didn't bought a founder's and I'm glad, also have 0 plans on buying MC; perhaps when they'll open a EU server
they are heading fast towards pay2win on a large scale, via consumables

It has been an expensive lesson for me (bought the top package  :Smile_sad: ) but it has taught me a lesson I will not soon forget, namely not to pre-purchase games (or game credit) on faith and love of the setting alone.

eumir #1125 Posted 08 March 2013 - 09:01 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 11142 battles
  • 78
  • Member since:
    05-12-2011

View PostLiannaSilverwind, on 07 March 2013 - 10:22 PM, said:

Snib, please come back! ;)

I am confident I can most likely provide similar statistics for 0.8.3. Well, tank's stats are almost the same as on blog.noobmeter.com, but it doesn't cover any other data like SniB did.

Anyone interested?

LiannaSilverwind #1126 Posted 08 March 2013 - 10:21 AM

    Veteran

  • Veteran
  • 5460 battles
  • 957
  • [JOKE] JOKE
  • Member since:
    07-12-2010

View Posteumir, on 08 March 2013 - 09:01 AM, said:

I am confident I can most likely provide similar statistics for 0.8.3. Well, tank's stats are almost the same as on blog.noobmeter.com, but it doesn't cover any other data like SniB did.
Anyone interested?

Dear Eumir, I am interested! And I'm sure I'm not alone. :)

Vinth #1127 Posted 08 March 2013 - 12:33 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 24633 battles
  • 19
  • [DALE] DALE
  • Member since:
    10-18-2011

View PostLiannaSilverwind, on 08 March 2013 - 10:21 AM, said:

Dear Eumir, I am interested! And I'm sure I'm not alone. :)
Affirmative!  :Smile_Default:

Silu_0 #1128 Posted 08 March 2013 - 12:40 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 6327 battles
  • 569
  • Member since:
    02-10-2011

View Posteumir, on 08 March 2013 - 09:01 AM, said:

I am confident I can most likely provide similar statistics for 0.8.3. Well, tank's stats are almost the same as on blog.noobmeter.com, but it doesn't cover any other data like SniB did.
Oh, please do :)

eumir #1129 Posted 08 March 2013 - 12:45 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 11142 battles
  • 78
  • Member since:
    05-12-2011
OK, working on it, should be done till the evening.

eumir #1130 Posted 10 March 2013 - 04:33 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 11142 battles
  • 78
  • Member since:
    05-12-2011
Sorry for delay but meanwhile I discovered forums are broken and longer posts are not possible. Had to create own blog. Here's link with some statistics:

http://eumireo.wordp...3-game-version/

TL;DR version:
Amount of players with at least 1 battle: 3 862 230
Average number of battles: 957 (median: 69, standard deviation: 2348.363)
Average winrate: 46.202% (median: 47.422%, standard deviation: 19.426%)
Average damage per battle: 141.397 (median: 64.143, standard deviation: 214.704)
Average efficiency (new XVM formula): 476 (median: 488, standard deviation: 365)
Average efficiency (WN6 formula): 139 (median: 77, standard deviation: 428)

Trent #1131 Posted 10 March 2013 - 04:50 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 10516 battles
  • 2,433
  • Member since:
    07-20-2011
Nice.

You should start your own thread, Eumir, fame and glory awaits you. :Smile_blinky:

Grimdorf #1132 Posted 10 March 2013 - 06:22 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 11658 battles
  • 1,918
  • Member since:
    11-26-2012
Very interesting, thank you.

Ghettoforce #1133 Posted 10 March 2013 - 07:32 PM

    Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 10395 battles
  • 268
  • [BWR] BWR
  • Member since:
    01-19-2011

View Posteumir, on 10 March 2013 - 04:33 PM, said:

Sorry for delay but meanwhile I discovered forums are broken and longer posts are not possible. Had to create own blog. Here's link with some statistics:

http://eumireo.wordp...3-game-version/

TL;DR version:
Amount of players with at least 1 battle: 3 862 230
Average number of battles: 957 (median: 69, standard deviation: 2348.363)
Average winrate: 46.202% (median: 47.422%, standard deviation: 19.426%)
Average damage per battle: 141.397 (median: 64.143, standard deviation: 214.704)
Average efficiency (new XVM formula): 476 (median: 488, standard deviation: 365)
Average efficiency (WN6 formula): 139 (median: 77, standard deviation: 428)
nice work eumir, time for your own thread!!! +1

zmeul #1134 Posted 10 March 2013 - 07:32 PM

    Captain

  • Beta Tester
  • 19547 battles
  • 2,133
  • Member since:
    07-10-2010

View Posteumir, on 10 March 2013 - 04:33 PM, said:

Amount of players with at least 1 battle: 3 862 230
Players over 100 battles; Players: 1 761 353

now the question: should I understand that less than 1/2 of the total players have more than 100 battles ??

snib's stats made this more clearer

Stokkolm #1135 Posted 11 March 2013 - 09:13 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 12422 battles
  • 1,528
  • Member since:
    04-28-2011

View Posteumir, on 10 March 2013 - 04:33 PM, said:


Average efficiency (WN6 formula): 139 (median: 77, standard deviation: 428)

Epic stuff  :Smile_veryhappy:

sword_of_Damocles #1136 Posted 11 March 2013 - 10:52 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 55737 battles
  • 5,279
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    03-26-2011
Very good work man,thank you very much

Lepr0n #1137 Posted 11 March 2013 - 11:00 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 28210 battles
  • 321
  • [V24] V24
  • Member since:
    08-15-2010
Fantastic work! Love stats! Make your own little thread with a link to your blog. Been missing these stats so much.

A big thumbs up sir! And may you be showered with medals and have parades in your honor!

:Smile_great::Smile_great::Smile_great::Smile_great:

Edited by Lepr0n, 11 March 2013 - 11:01 AM.


Trent #1138 Posted 09 April 2013 - 09:17 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 10516 battles
  • 2,433
  • Member since:
    07-20-2011
Posted Image

...because, well, it would be a shame if such a piece of forum history simply went to archive - even if its first page is inaccessible (for now). :blinky:

Edited by Trent, 09 April 2013 - 09:18 AM.


Bobbydancer #1139 Posted 09 April 2013 - 10:06 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 41188 battles
  • 852
  • [GGG] GGG
  • Member since:
    04-05-2011

View Posteumir, on 10 March 2013 - 04:33 PM, said:

Sorry for delay but meanwhile I discovered forums are broken and longer posts are not possible. Had to create own blog. Here's link with some statistics:

http://eumireo.wordp...3-game-version/

TL;DR version:
Amount of players with at least 1 battle: 3 862 230
Average number of battles: 957 (median: 69, standard deviation: 2348.363)
Average winrate: 46.202% (median: 47.422%, standard deviation: 19.426%)
Average damage per battle: 141.397 (median: 64.143, standard deviation: 214.704)
Average efficiency (new XVM formula): 476 (median: 488, standard deviation: 365)
Average efficiency (WN6 formula): 139 (median: 77, standard deviation: 428)

Great stuff, I would give you an B for this presentation (Snib, I gave an C/C-). The Post above me, I give an A, this is stuff that can enlighten my day :)

If you would increasy youre grade you could add 10% and 90% interval for players. Maybe also inclued 99%. Experienced players want to see how uniqe they are :) I would also point out that I had to cut youre grade cause you made conclusions in the end which you have no evidence to back up. It doesn't always have to be an resonable relationship behind every observed correlation.

To aprove you're grade, before next semester, you can try to study the applied formulas (WN and Eff. r) There you should look at assumptions behind models. I think a student like you will be able to see where the correlation with win rate comes from. If not I will advice to you to break up gameplay in smaller fractions and analyse again. Make sure if all explanatory variables are on one side of of the equation and all of the dependend are at the other side. This models, made by soo called statisticians, or whatever, aint neccassairly correct build. Do not take that for granted if you want A+ grades on youre work.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users