Jump to content


March of Nations Draws to a Close


  • Please log in to reply
94 replies to this topic

Xaneleon #21 Posted 29 November 2017 - 10:46 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 24421 battles
  • 1,026
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    01-09-2013

Really liked the format and tournament too. As for the Tier X results, it was fun to flex some muscles and claim top 10 on the arguably hardest leaderboard.:medal:

 

This really felt nice and competitive, though the rewards were a bit ... underwhelming.

Much like the campaign rewards are very underwhelming for the effort needed.



uglycousin #22 Posted 29 November 2017 - 11:00 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 47714 battles
  • 3,954
  • Member since:
    09-01-2014

View PostXaneleon, on 29 November 2017 - 11:46 AM, said:

Really liked the format and tournament too. As for the Tier X results, it was fun to flex some muscles and claim top 10 on the arguably hardest leaderboard.:medal:

 

This really felt nice and competitive, though the rewards were a bit ... underwhelming.

Much like the campaign rewards are very underwhelming for the effort needed.

 

Congrats. :)

CORsicaRED #23 Posted 29 November 2017 - 11:03 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 22996 battles
  • 3
  • [_PA] _PA
  • Member since:
    11-25-2012
fuuuu

taratronic #24 Posted 29 November 2017 - 11:06 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 35445 battles
  • 2
  • [WP-BA] WP-BA
  • Member since:
    09-05-2014

What the heck wargaming i was playing like crazy with tier 8 tanks T26e4 pershing  OHO IS3  and i was top 400 with all of them and i dont get any rewards all that hard work for nothing whatt the heck

 



uglycousin #25 Posted 29 November 2017 - 11:07 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 47714 battles
  • 3,954
  • Member since:
    09-01-2014

View PostCORsicaRED, on 29 November 2017 - 12:03 PM, said:

fuuuu

 

 

You missed the event and you are now upset? :P

 

Trying to help you here buddy, the mods are watching ... you know?

 

 

View Posttaratronic, on 29 November 2017 - 12:06 PM, said:

What the heck wargaming i was playing like crazy with tier 8 tanks T26e4 pershing  OHO IS3  and i was top 400 with all of them and i dont get any rewards all that hard work for nothing whatt the heck

 

 

read this again:

 

Ever bothered to read the rules:)

 

Block Quote

 Results

  1. Rewards for the March of Nations competition will be provided within 14 days after its end, after excluding the players who violated the Game Rules from the final leaderboards.
  2. To receive the rewards, log in to the game client no later than 180 days after the competition ends.
  3.  

Edited by uglycousin, 29 November 2017 - 11:08 AM.


Rem1s #26 Posted 29 November 2017 - 11:11 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 29618 battles
  • 17
  • Member since:
    02-15-2014
Not sure what the point would be to rig this. 5 games of 1,200 base exp is enough to get to top 1000. Easy

MarcoStrapone #27 Posted 29 November 2017 - 11:28 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 43092 battles
  • 924
  • [-BOMB] -BOMB
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013
one week prem not bad,

StinkyStonky #28 Posted 29 November 2017 - 11:29 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 35676 battles
  • 2,828
  • [-SJA-] -SJA-
  • Member since:
    11-02-2015

View Postogremage, on 29 November 2017 - 08:12 AM, said:

 

I think they want to have enough time to cut through support ticket backlog which say "these guys from same clan did count-down to get in same battles, then people helped one person farm damage to get high XP". It's theoretically possible.

 

Are there clans where the players are cooperative like that (even if it's cheating) ?

 

We do countdowns quite often and it's always ruthless and brutal :ohmy:



MarcoStrapone #29 Posted 29 November 2017 - 11:38 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 43092 battles
  • 924
  • [-BOMB] -BOMB
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013

View PostStinkyStonky, on 29 November 2017 - 10:29 AM, said:

 

Are there clans where the players are cooperative like that (even if it's cheating) ?

 

We do countdowns quite often and it's always ruthless and brutal :ohmy:

 

why you think they block both team chat, bcz wg staff dont want you to reveal the position of the enemy? lol think again. it bcz the possibilty to contact the enemy team for  and sync things, special personal missions.

MarcoStrapone #30 Posted 29 November 2017 - 11:39 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 43092 battles
  • 924
  • [-BOMB] -BOMB
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013

View PostMarcoStrapone, on 29 November 2017 - 10:38 AM, said:

 

why you think they block both team chat, bcz wg staff dont want you to reveal the position of the enemy? lol think again. it bcz the possibilty to contact the enemy team for  and sync things, special personal missions.

 

oooops, late night sync are the best.

Iskusan_Tenkista #31 Posted 29 November 2017 - 11:40 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 35951 battles
  • 17
  • [RUL3S] RUL3S
  • Member since:
    01-29-2012
Very nice tournament, it was quite easy to get to the top 1k, especially with tier 7. I got almost 2 months of premium account and nearly 300 booster which is excellent reward, and I played only for a week. Would love to see another tournament like this in near future :)

bambakla1 #32 Posted 29 November 2017 - 11:41 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 26692 battles
  • 47
  • [D-H-K] D-H-K
  • Member since:
    03-24-2013

unfair ? of course unfair, somebody played only on top of the teams, somebody like me, who received the same "condescension" from WG only in 5% - 7%. The players must have the equal chances in the game, but the WG does not give such opportunities to players.

Yes, i got in first 1000 players (VIII), but what it cost me, what nerves and times !!!..  it's just not fair.



Iskusan_Tenkista #33 Posted 29 November 2017 - 11:53 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 35951 battles
  • 17
  • [RUL3S] RUL3S
  • Member since:
    01-29-2012

View PostMarianNicolae, on 29 November 2017 - 09:33 AM, said:

The event was nice, but it rewarded in great numbers people who had a lot of time to play.
It was not uncommon to see in the leaderboards players with 100 to 300 games in one tier, on one nation, and then see the same player with hundreds of games in other nations/tiers leaderboards. If you can play that many games, eventually some are going to be good. For me, having played 1 or 2 hours per day and not everyday, there wasn't really any chance.
 

Man what's the point of rewarding the players who don't put effort in game. Either you put effort by playing 200-300 games so you get lucky to hit high exp or you put high effort as a good gameplay in 30-40 battles and carry the team, both should be rewarded. But playing average and only 1-2 hours per day you actually didn't bring the effort and just wanted the reward for being a player. 



GuliwerReborn #34 Posted 29 November 2017 - 11:56 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 42977 battles
  • 165
  • Member since:
    06-30-2015
Lolz hit ladder in TVP VTU with 50% of results from other nations :) and now I can sell as I finally grinded next Skoda

Furlock #35 Posted 29 November 2017 - 11:59 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 69274 battles
  • 691
  • [EWOKS] EWOKS
  • Member since:
    08-20-2012

You may repeat this event very soon, and exactly as it is. First time I had fun in an event.

 

Thx.



etody77 #36 Posted 29 November 2017 - 12:18 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 77574 battles
  • 1,476
  • [JMA] JMA
  • Member since:
    09-12-2015
Instead of nations it's better 'March of classes'

Rattogigi #37 Posted 29 November 2017 - 12:33 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 60580 battles
  • 99
  • Member since:
    01-27-2011

Just why you deleted the leaderboard of event with all partial result from game? Now i Can't know the last position because i didn't access the game in the last 18h...

(sorry for my english)


Edited by Rattogigi, 29 November 2017 - 01:06 PM.


daiena #38 Posted 29 November 2017 - 12:41 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 13817 battles
  • 9
  • Member since:
    05-16-2011

View PostMarianNicolae, on 29 November 2017 - 09:33 AM, said:

The event was nice, but it rewarded in great numbers people who had a lot of time to play.
It was not uncommon to see in the leaderboards players with 100 to 300 games in one tier, on one nation, and then see the same player with hundreds of games in other nations/tiers leaderboards. If you can play that many games, eventually some are going to be good. For me, having played 1 or 2 hours per day and not everyday, there wasn't really any chance.

So you want to be rewarded just by showing up? The premium time e.t.c is not the main lure - it's the credit boosters that are sought after. And if you can afford to throw at the game 1 or 2 hours a day max, you really shouldn't expect equality.


Edited by daiena, 29 November 2017 - 12:44 PM.


Xaneleon #39 Posted 29 November 2017 - 12:52 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 24421 battles
  • 1,026
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    01-09-2013

View PostRem1s, on 29 November 2017 - 10:11 AM, said:

Not sure what the point would be to rig this. 5 games of 1,200 base exp is enough to get to top 1000. Easy

 

Because you want to be top 10, not top 1000. See that shiny badge it gave? :P Worth rigging for for some people out there!

dix90 #40 Posted 29 November 2017 - 01:06 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 42650 battles
  • 4
  • Member since:
    01-19-2013
this event was a crap. look at the tanks that are in the top: e25, prime viktoria and other premium vehicles. pay to win. shame on you, WG!




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users