Jump to content


how to reduce your account lockout


  • Please log in to reply
20 replies to this topic

ttboki #1 Posted 01 December 2017 - 06:53 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 51220 battles
  • 8
  • [S_G_S] S_G_S
  • Member since:
    12-17-2013
MY SUGESTION, I would be bound to lock up the warrant, I salute the sentences, but only the 7-day penalties, why?

My suggestion would be to not lock up permanently, for a simple reason, because there is huge money in question.
You should do that no one can run the game client if he has mods
In my opinion, it is easier to punish and not allow to play, but something needs to be done and the player is kept at the same time, the money is kept.
It can also lock the order, 1 month, the next sentence is 2 months, the next sentence is 3 months 4-5-6-7 and until the player comes to mind, I think that there would be more honest people, the player was left without a warrant and had invested a lot of money
I would not misunderstand me, I am to respect the rules of the game, but I also have to punish and never end a permanent order to someone.
I would love to be able to all of those who have a locked order, that I will give you another chance until you find another solution
Friend greeting

sgtYester #2 Posted 01 December 2017 - 06:57 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 52222 battles
  • 1,412
  • [RANGF] RANGF
  • Member since:
    04-10-2011
woot?

K_A #3 Posted 01 December 2017 - 06:59 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 13566 battles
  • 4,656
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    04-18-2013
hurr durr mods should be banned and I use google translate hurr durr

ExclamationMark #4 Posted 01 December 2017 - 07:00 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 16679 battles
  • 3,727
  • Member since:
    04-12-2013
Nope, should be permanent after a 1 week ban. You can't wave the "oh I've spent lots of money here so just let me away with it" card with everything.

RamRaid90 #5 Posted 01 December 2017 - 07:05 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 19672 battles
  • 5,847
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

Translation:

 

tl:dr: -  Got perm banned for cheating, it's unfair and I promise to spend lots of parents money if you let me cheat. I'm terrible.

 

In my opinion. All cheaters should, on production of solid evidence, be permanently banned without a 7 day warning first.


Edited by RamRaid90, 01 December 2017 - 07:07 PM.


Richthoffen #6 Posted 01 December 2017 - 07:07 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 26517 battles
  • 2,444
  • Member since:
    12-23-2011
it's the mods.. they make you a 47%er... most mods are cosmetic, some give a unfair advantage and get people banned but without mods the game is less attracting so I prefer mods to give me a nice scope, engine sound and crew voices

etody77 #7 Posted 01 December 2017 - 07:30 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 58408 battles
  • 635
  • [PT-RO] PT-RO
  • Member since:
    09-12-2015
buy the gme and usewhat mods you want :)

Pvt_Duffer #8 Posted 01 December 2017 - 07:45 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 16404 battles
  • 3,012
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-11-2011

Have you met my friend Gary_67?

Or do you have worse friends?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No offence to Gary_067 of course ;)


Edited by Pvt_Duffer, 01 December 2017 - 07:45 PM.


Bordhaw #9 Posted 01 December 2017 - 08:12 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 9559 battles
  • 1,200
  • Member since:
    01-29-2017

View Postttboki, on 01 December 2017 - 05:53 PM, said:

MY SUGESTION, I would be bound to lock up the warrant, I salute the sentences, but only the 7-day penalties, why?

My suggestion would be to not lock up permanently, for a simple reason, because there is huge money in question.
You should do that no one can run the game client if he has mods
In my opinion, it is easier to punish and not allow to play, but something needs to be done and the player is kept at the same time, the money is kept.
It can also lock the order, 1 month, the next sentence is 2 months, the next sentence is 3 months 4-5-6-7 and until the player comes to mind, I think that there would be more honest people, the player was left without a warrant and had invested a lot of money
I would not misunderstand me, I am to respect the rules of the game, but I also have to punish and never end a permanent order to someone.
I would love to be able to all of those who have a locked order, that I will give you another chance until you find another solution
Friend greeting

 

 



Jigabachi #10 Posted 01 December 2017 - 08:24 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17746 battles
  • 17,624
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011
People who use obvious cheatmods should be permabanned right away.
Who the hell cares how much an aimbotter spends on the game. If you spend a lot and then decide to cheat, it's your fault.

Solstad1069 #11 Posted 01 December 2017 - 08:32 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 38854 battles
  • 2,878
  • Member since:
    06-15-2013

Jesus, does google randomly put the words together?

That was a lot more than 25% RNG :)


Edited by Solstad1069, 01 December 2017 - 08:32 PM.


Aikl #12 Posted 01 December 2017 - 08:35 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 25141 battles
  • 4,003
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

It's a pity that you just get banned from WoT (and maybe WoWs/WoWp?). I believe VAC and PunkBuster banned you from all games using them if they caught you. Bit easier when the game doesn't allow mods, of course, but it's not like you'll get banned for using a proper WoT mod pack (and worst-case you get that seven-day ban first).



japtank #13 Posted 01 December 2017 - 10:11 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27611 battles
  • 1,046
  • Member since:
    04-20-2012

View PostRamRaid90, on 01 December 2017 - 07:05 PM, said:

 All cheaters should, on production of solid evidence, be permanently banned without a 7 day warning first.

 

You're way too lenient, offenders should be shot.

That would teach them!

 

Seriously, if people cheat, it's because WG gave them the tools to cheat.

Ban WG :izmena:



Pandabird #14 Posted 01 December 2017 - 10:13 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 33973 battles
  • 4,517
  • [KOFF] KOFF
  • Member since:
    05-19-2013
World's smallest violin

RamRaid90 #15 Posted 01 December 2017 - 10:20 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 19672 battles
  • 5,847
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

View Postjaptank, on 01 December 2017 - 09:11 PM, said:

 

You're way too lenient, offenders should be shot.

That would teach them!

 

Seriously, if people cheat, it's because WG gave them the tools to cheat.

Ban WG :izmena:

 

Even better. Don't ban them, make them turn perma-blue in game (enabling team damage) and every tank they drive has a 6 foot "Dunce" cap on it's turret to show off how stupid they are...

 

:B



AliceUnchained #16 Posted 01 December 2017 - 10:23 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 37820 battles
  • 8,521
  • [322] 322
  • Member since:
    10-18-2011

View PostRamRaid90, on 01 December 2017 - 10:20 PM, said:

 

Even better. Don't ban them, make them turn perma-blue in game (enabling team damage) and every tank they drive has a 6 foot "Dunce" cap on it's turret to show off how stupid they are...

 

:B

 

Actually... That would be a far, far better solution!

RamRaid90 #17 Posted 01 December 2017 - 11:04 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 19672 battles
  • 5,847
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

View PostAliceUnchained, on 01 December 2017 - 09:23 PM, said:

 

Actually... That would be a far, far better solution!

 

I imagine it would be quite popular.

Pvt_Duffer #18 Posted 01 December 2017 - 11:08 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 16404 battles
  • 3,012
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-11-2011

View PostRamRaid90, on 01 December 2017 - 10:04 PM, said:

 

I imagine it would be quite popular.

 

April 1 ban wave.

 

 

Please WG!!

 

 

Please!!!

 

 

You could even rename them to April_Special_nnn and give the a free rename after 2 months.

 

 

Do it!!!

 



Spurtung #19 Posted 01 December 2017 - 11:11 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 60081 battles
  • 5,474
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostRamRaid90, on 01 December 2017 - 11:20 PM, said:

 

Even better. Don't ban them, make them turn perma-blue in game (enabling team damage) and every tank they drive has a 6 foot "Dunce" cap on it's turret to show off how stupid they are...

 

:B

 

Sounds great. And if they mess with their teams at all *bam*, blue's dead.

Balc0ra #20 Posted 01 December 2017 - 11:22 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 62787 battles
  • 14,390
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View Postttboki, on 01 December 2017 - 06:53 PM, said:

My suggestion would be to not lock up permanently, for a simple reason, because there is huge money in question.
 

 

Repeat offenders that don't get it should be perma banned the 2nd time. It's one of the few things I applaud WG for doing. And if they had invested so much money in it. They would think twice about doing it again. But some did not it seems going by the last ban wave. Their loss tbh.

 

View Postttboki, on 01 December 2017 - 06:53 PM, said:

 
You should do that no one can run the game client if he has mods
 

 

And how would you do that? scan Res_mods? disable it? Issue is that the way the core game is built up with mod support. Res_mods is only a fail safe. Back in the day, mods were added directly in to the core files and overwrote them. Some mods even today can be made to do that. Like overwriting the old UI and using the mod one etc.

 

View Postttboki, on 01 December 2017 - 06:53 PM, said:

In my opinion, it is easier to punish and not allow to play, but something needs to be done and the player is kept at the same time, the money is kept.
It can also lock the order, 1 month, the next sentence is 2 months, the next sentence is 3 months 4-5-6-7 and until the player comes to mind, I think that there would be more honest people, the player was left without a 

 

Until the player comes to mind? Repeat offenders should not be given that many chances even. They have one chance to "come to mind" now. And that's more then fair IMO. Most games just outright perma ban you. WOT is one of the few games where you get more then one chance. I don't care if they used €3000 on the game. If they keep cheating, keep getting caught. Do you honestly want them there? If they can't get the big picture after getting banned 7 times for it. Then I suspect they never will. A 2 time limit will make most think twice about it again, and will play vanilla for all time. Not if they know they have more chances, they will just keep doing it. And that's not the goal here.

 

If anything it would be a slap on the wrist and most would not care. It's like "I'll just play something different for 2 months and come back and do it again".






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users